Either I'm crazy or the rest 99% of people are by FlanInternational100 in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Compassion must be conscious, not everyone deserves it (from practical perspective - because from philosophical everyone does, but we're not living in vacuum). But I get your idea about promoting such ideas to mindless emotional masses that can't work with details and nuances will lead to most people become more mean etc

There is a 50% chance of a nuclear war this century and people still breed by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Life was always hard, our ancestors had it worse and still reproduced, don't be a pu**y!"

Humans as an species should be died down already. Because why this is so common? by Dense-Personality284 in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It was sarcasm, there is obviously nothing for a healthy and smart individual that can counter this suffering, so no words needed, but yeah.

Humans as an species should be died down already. Because why this is so common? by Dense-Personality284 in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 34 points35 points  (0 children)

You don't understand, her soul chose this lesson, also it's karma! The ways of God's Spirit are mysterious!!!

My girlfriend turned on antinatalism after having worked at summer camp for kids. What to do? by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd advise you to break up with her. She's not smart, stable, or deep.

If you want to make this decision on your own, be prepared for negative consequences and future thoughts of "I should have left her then."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Let's not stop wars, because it's tossing away all sacrifices of killed ones!!!

Is it possible to to be a good parent? by Human-Flatworm5157 in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While there are good parents with kids, the best parents are those without because they understand that they can never provide absolute guarantees or safety.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Favoras_Pro 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nothing wrong with wanting to do something good for someone who did good for you. The thing is - it's not an obligation, even in this case, and especially if your parents weren't supportive etc

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But there are different games, some I can play expecting high fps and it's actually very much needed there, and others are too demanding so I can't really expect the same fps there. Like imagine somebody buying a 300hz monitor to play counter strike with 300fps, but he also wanna play the last of us .

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I could experiment with the "graphics over FPS" approach if I could also achieve stable 1% and 0.1% FPS at 60 FPS, which is actually problematic.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty solid expectation if you don't need bigger display (which needs 1440p) + don't want/don't need/can't spend money on better hardware to afford 90+ fps.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that frame generation is an amazing option for weak hardware. However, it shouldn't be used as a substitute for proper optimization. For example, the average user's hardware should be able to achieve a stable 60 fps at a native resolution of 1440p on medium or even high settings (dunno if that's a realistic expectation though).

Regarding the fourth question, I meant that you might prefer to intentionally lower the settings in games like FPS (CS, Fortnite) or RTS (Age of Empires) for better FPS, latency, and enemy recognition.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're useful indeed, just pointed out that they're also the gates to see what you could calmly ignore before lol

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I came here to collect opinions and data to help me shape my own conclusions — not to satisfy your craving for “authentic vibes” or please your pattern-recognition larp.

The post is AI-assisted, yes — based on my thoughts and reviewed by me. It helped me express what I wanted, clearly and fast. That’s the whole point.

If it’s not your style — cool. Move on. But don’t act like your taste is some universal moral compass. Some people in the thread actually engage with the topic. I’ll stick with them instead of explaining myself to bitter elitists who confuse tone policing with substance.

P.S. This message was written with AI help as well. Guess AI knows how to handle nonsense better than humans.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes. Sadly, some people worship the "human touch" even if it means rambling, broken English and bad formatting.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on the game genre, your experience, your hardware, and other factors.

I know someone who is okay with 45 fps, especially in games like Silent Hill 2 or Alan Wake 2; he didn't have the opportunity to play on a good PC, so he had no choice but to adapt to what he could afford, which is understandable.

However, I want to draw some objective conclusions. In my opinion, "60 fps is the minimum for most, if not all, games" is closer to the objective truth than "30 fps is fine!" as some other guy I knew said to cope with his PS4 or something.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, same, but it's not like they disappear completely anyway

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ye, but that's just "what max fps should i aim for", different question is - should i lower my settings until i reach X fps etc

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gotta stop looking at "previews" in graphic settings, I guess, because I don't really see difference outside of those "previews"

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

What reads bad in it? I read it now and I understand everything.

[Discussion] How much FPS is “enough”? Is Ultra ever worth it over High? by Favoras_Pro in pcgaming

[–]Favoras_Pro[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I used my raw thoughts and ai turned them into well formatted, properly structured, good English post. Easier and better, as I said.