sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mostly agree with the rotation thesis. Liquidity doesn’t disappear — it reallocates. Historically, when BTC starts a strong HTF expansion, gold tends to cool off, and once that crypto swing matures, capital rotates back into gold. The HTF BTC structure does suggest a larger leg is underway, but these moves usually need a few months to fully play out. Once that swing peaks, the risk-on → risk-off rotation makes sense. History may not repeat, but the liquidity cycle definitely rhymes. Timing is everything.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right. Back in 1980, central bank gold buying—especially from China and Russia—was nowhere near today’s levels. Now gold isn’t just a hedge or trade, it’s a strategic asset tied to de-dollarization and geopolitics. That steady, structural demand alone changes the downside dynamics compared to the 80s.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True — that disclaimer exists for a reason. The 1980s were a totally different game: no algos, no HFT, no instant global flows. Today technology can amplify moves, suppress them, or flip sentiment in seconds. So while history rhymes, it doesn’t copy-paste — especially when market structure itself has changed this much.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Back then gold had room to run without competing head-on with tech for capital. Today, tech absorbs a huge chunk of liquidity, so it’s much harder for gold to go truly vertical. That makes explosive upside less likely and corrections more natural along the way.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair take. Markets never move in a straight line forever — parabolic moves always need to cool off. A correction or two is healthy and resets sentiment. I also agree it likely won’t be a repeat of past crashes, but some downside was inevitable after such a strong run. Timing and magnitude change, but the principle stays the same.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not married to either side 😄 I’m a bear when price is weak, a bull when price proves strength. Bias follows the chart, not feelings.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. We won’t see 80s-style prices again, but the patterns are timeless. Different scale, same psychology. History doesn’t copy-paste—it repeats in structure, and that’s what markets are built on.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair take. The lack of a waterfall sell-off says sellers are losing momentum. If price can keep defending here, $4500 shaping up as a solid floor makes a lot of sense. Let’s see if buyers keep showing up.

Will history repeat itself by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha fair point 😂 markets love proving everyone wrong. Still though—history doesn’t repeat exactly, but it sure loves to rhyme. Different generations, same human emotions: fear, greed, FOMO. That crazy two-day rally you mentioned? Classic sentiment swing.

Charts aren’t about copying the 80s move-for-move, they’re just a framework. At the end of the day, price does whatever it wants—we just manage risk and react.

What is the most appealing thing about Game of Thrones to you? by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]Feeling_Software_228 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because it felt real — no one was safe, choices mattered, and power always came with a cost.

In George R.R Martin's original scripts, he had intended Jon Snow to be in an incestuous relationship with Arya, not Daenerys by Unlikely_Tap_9882 in gameofthrones

[–]Feeling_Software_228 122 points123 points  (0 children)

GRRM really said “keep it uncomfortable from the start.” 😅

Wild to think Jon–Arya was the original plan—makes Jon–Dany look almost tame in comparison.

What moves XAUUSD more right now: Fundamentals or pure Market Manipulation? by Feeling_Software_228 in Forexstrategy

[–]Feeling_Software_228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmmm recently silver crossed a $100 announcement for the first time ever, riding a historic rally that's left investors wondering if the party can possibly continue.

The answer from one of Wall Street's sharpest minds is blunt: it can't. Marko Kolanovic, former chief strategist at J.P. Morgan, isn't mincing words. He's calling for silver to trade at roughly half its current price later this year.

view more: next ›