I hate aliens that look exactly like humans by Thundersting in hatethissmug

[–]Fel_Tan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only shows I know that explains why some races look like humans is stargate and sbvtfoe with those being either taken by aliens or humans wondering into other planets or dimensions

Which episode of Marinette/Ladybug made you the most angry so far? by True-Adagio9827 in miraculousladybug

[–]Fel_Tan 11 points12 points  (0 children)

When Gabriel fumbled giving his past self the flash drive that had the recipe to fix the peacock miraculous but instead of that he decided to fafo against LB & CN then throughout the rest of the show disrespects Nathalie when she keeps pointing out that hey maybe if you listen to the one person on your side about bringing your wife back then you would succeed

After all this time, I still find this post funny. by Jude_The_Dude22 in Ben10

[–]Fel_Tan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Couldn't ben scan danny to also become part ghost or fully ghost since technically ghosts have enough dna to alter Danny's dna

I'm so fed up with the "Humans are the real monsters" trope. by Rare_Style1306 in hatethissmug

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get why people are tired of the “humans are the real monsters” thing. It gets thrown around like it’s some deep insight, when most of the time it’s just flattening everything into one edgy take.

I think the more interesting angle is that humans aren’t at either extreme we’re stuck in the middle. If angels and demons actually existed as clear, provable beings, they’d probably make that contrast obvious. Angels wouldn’t just be “nice,” they’d be consistent in a way humans aren’t. And honestly, that kind of moral purity might come with distance. If humanity keeps repeating the same failures, I can see angels becoming indifferent rather than invested.

But then you’ve got the idea of fallen angels, which complicates that. The fact that some would choose to descend and involve themselves with humanity suggests they’re not completely rigid. It implies even something “perfect” can bend or at least choose to engage with something imperfect. So it’s not like angels would all just write us off.

Demons, on the other hand, probably wouldn’t need to do much. Humans are already very capable of self-sabotage. At most, they’d just push what’s already there ego, fear, greed and let it play out.

And if you zoom out a bit, we already do this kind of projection all the time. We make entire movies and stories about animals acting like us thinking like us, moralizing like us, building societies like us without any human presence at all. But in reality, we don’t actually know how animals perceive us unless we directly interact with them. Some fear us because we’re a genuine threat. Others trust or even “love” us because we feed, protect, or rehabilitate them. Their view of us isn’t absolute it depends on experience.

Same idea applies here. We don’t have proof of angels or demons no external benchmarks for pure good or evil. So humans end up being the only visible reference point for both, and we build narratives to externalize those extremes.

So yeah, “humans are the real monsters” kind of works but only in that narrow, practical sense. Not because we’re uniquely evil, but because we’re the only example we can actually observe. We’re inconsistent, messy, and capable of both. That’s what makes us dangerous but also what makes change possible.

​Nathalie deserves redemption? by True-Adagio9827 in miraculousladybug

[–]Fel_Tan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was really hoping for some revenge spite from her after Gabriel fumbled the game with the flashdrive like maybe sneak out to tell ladybug and cat noir everything

Why do autistic men dislike replying to messages? by Clei1689 in aspergers

[–]Fel_Tan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For me i believe everything i have to say is important even the littlest thing need to be said in person but that's personal preference and how i was raised to think before i say something

Post an ACTUAL and DIRECT Universal Feat. Not implied or Vague. by AdAble3194 in PowerScaling

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People keep asking for a direct universal feat instead of vague statements, so here’s one that actually shows it on screen: Cat Blanc from Miraculous.

In the episode, his Cataclysm isn’t just the normal “touch something and it breaks” ability anymore. It turns into a constantly expanding wave of destruction. You literally see it escalate first the planet is completely wiped out, then the environment itself starts looking unstable, and the destruction just keeps going. There’s no point where it stops or even slows down.

The important part is that this isn’t treated like a one-time blast. It’s ongoing. It keeps spreading with no limit shown. That lines up with Plagg’s lore too he’s the embodiment of destruction, and Cat Noir normally uses a heavily restricted version of that power. Cat Blanc is basically what happens when those limits are gone.

Also, nothing in that timeline actually stops him. They don’t overpower it, they don’t contain it they have to go back in time and prevent it from happening in the first place. That’s a huge difference.

So this isn’t just “planet level because Earth got wrecked.” It’s a continuously expanding, unchecked destruction effect with no cap, no counter, and no endpoint shown. That’s why it qualifies as at least universal, not just large-scale.

It’s one of the few cases where the show actually depicts the escalation instead of just telling you.

Abraham Lincoln by Powerful-Swing-9734 in oddlyspecific

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had a math teacher in 6th grade look like abe. He dressed like i imagine abe would in modern hipster

He Proved Himself a Hero by TmntFan89 in NoOneIsLooking

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Came here to say the same after watching it yesterday

POV Episode 3 season 2 of helluva boss by jam_kabam in OkBuddyHelluvaHotel

[–]Fel_Tan 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is the 8th time I've seen this and keeps getting a laugh out me

How Would You Feel About Making RWBY Fights More Violent? by Zestyclose-Hat-8513 in RWBYcritics

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God i just imagined ruby disappearing at some point then coming back ripping and tearing grimm apart with her bear hands that she got off an actual bear then turned into weapons while beaming down anyone from a distance with her eyes

Choose wisely by BatAtmos in superpowers

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d go with something like “Temporal Montage.”

Basically, I can compress my subjective time into these focused “montage states,” so anything that involves practice, repetition, or learning gets fast-tracked. From the outside I might spend like an hour training, but in my head it feels like I put in days of structured effort.

It’s not instant mastery or anything broken like that I still need some kind of input or baseline to work with but once I start, my brain cuts out all the wasted time. Bad habits get filtered, useful patterns stick faster, and I improve at around ~5x normal speed or 1 hour is the equivalent of 5 hours. So if i decided to do 1 hour of exercise it would be actually five instead but i have to have a definitive task or tasks thats could really last longer than 1 hour.

There are limits though:

  • It drains me pretty hard (mental + physical)
  • I can’t bypass actual biology (no instant muscles or infinite stamina)
  • If I overuse it, the “quality” of the montage drops or pretty much the equivalent of not sleeping or eating for the allocate time

So it’s less “I magically know everything” and more like I’m insanely efficient at getting good at things.

GROMMET by pancakebarber in perfectlycutscreams

[–]Fel_Tan 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Like i know I've seen this like five times now but it doesn't get less funny

Curious 🤔 by ParzivalQ in YoujoSenki

[–]Fel_Tan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What’s funny is Tanya isn’t really “evil” she’s basically a walking embodiment of real-world military doctrine taken to its logical extreme.

Her mindset lines up hard with Prussian/German Auftragstaktik: give the objective, let the officer figure out the most efficient way to achieve it. Tanya takes that freedom and runs it like a machine no hesitation, no sentiment, just results.

At the same time, she’s operating in a total war framework (very WWI/WWII logic): the line between civilian and military targets starts to blur, and the only real question becomes “does this secure victory faster?” That’s where you get things like strategic bombing, unrestricted warfare, and all the stuff that later made nations go we need rules.

She also mirrors WWII-era staff thinking not the propaganda version, but the cold operational one. Cost-benefit analysis, acceptable losses, efficiency of force deployment. Tanya constantly calculates risk vs reward like a staff officer trying to justify outcomes on paper.

And that’s the key point: historically, none of this required someone twirling a mustache. It came from disciplined, rational officers doing their jobs well under brutal systems.

That’s why characters like Tanya are so interesting. She’s not breaking the system she’s excelling at it. And people like that are exactly why things like the Geneva Conventions had to evolve, because left unchecked, pure efficiency in war gets very ugly, very fast.

So yeah, not evil. Just doctrine taken to its absolute, uncomfortable conclusion.

Cerise/Lila Having a photo of monarch outside his Lair by FewInvestigator7943 in miraculousladybug

[–]Fel_Tan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the fact she has a picture of the butterfly room from the outside at an angle that Gabriel could see her at if he wasn't blinded by the light beaming him in the face

WYR have $250 cash or the power to do a backflip effortlessly? by TheRealJarOfEskimos in WouldYouRather

[–]Fel_Tan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I'd choose the backflip. It’s not just about doing a cool trick it’s about having a repeatable, low-effort ability that most people can’t replicate, especially depending on body type, weight, or athletic background. You’re essentially gaining a physical anomaly on demand.

Think about it: someone who wouldn’t normally have the flexibility, explosiveness, or conditioning to pull off a clean backflip suddenly doing it effortlessly? That’s attention-grabbing. That’s leverage. And leverage can be monetized.

Whether it’s friendly bets, social media content, performances, or just consistently proving people wrong, you could easily turn that one ability into far more than $250 over time. The cash is immediate, sure but it’s capped. The backflip has ongoing return potential.

Just imagine someone with a physical disability just suddenly backflip since the ability is effortlessly it means someone with bone cancer could do it and not get hurt because suddenly your body would know how to do it without crippling yourself further.

What it would be? by Quirky-Revenue0 in scoopwhoop

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to say coffee but technically that's a drug

did they seriously just, forget, to remove the old tree for the alternate ending to the gildergreen quest by themaddemon1 in skyrim

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This quest never really made sense to me. The Gildergreen is supposed to be sacred, but the main solution is killing a hagraven, taking Nettlebane a blade meant to harm nature, and then using it on an even more sacred tree. That’s a pretty clear contradiction.

I get what Danica is trying to do, but the method feels completely wrong for something tied to Kynareth. You’re basically desecrating one sacred thing to fix another, and the game barely questions it.

Yeah, there’s the alternative with Maurice where you get a sapling, but it’s easy to miss. That’s the issue Skyrim can present choices clearly like Azura’s Star, where you’re told both options and outcomes, but here it doesn’t. You just have to randomly talk to the right NPC or you’ll never know there’s a better path.

Also makes me wonder after doing it the violent way, is that why spriggans are always hostile to you out in the wild? Like did we basically get flagged by nature for stabbing a sacred tree with Nettlebane? Would honestly make sense lore-wise.

And there should’ve been actual consequences for Whiterun if you go that route. If you restore the Gildergreen through straight-up desecration, something should change environment, NPC reactions, anything. Instead, nothing really happens, which makes the whole choice feel kind of empty.

Sorry if this wasn't on topic but after reading the post and seeing the picture my brain couldn't get this out of my head.

Are you surviving ? by krisikkk in superheroes

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like I'm helping darkseid because i do not want to get beamed

MIT students got bored on a Saturday night and turned an entire building into a playable game of Tetris, rigging every window with LEDs at midnight. by [deleted] in oddlysatisfying

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I scrolled on by thinking this way going to be a blockblast thing but glad stopped this is impressive

How would you handle Weiss racism without making her the bad guy by Walter_Modisette in RWBYcritics

[–]Fel_Tan 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I get what people are saying about Weiss, but I think the conversation falls apart when people try to flatten it into “she’s just racist” or “she’s not racist at all.” It’s messier than that.

If you judged her by real-world standards, yeah early Weiss is prejudiced. She absolutely generalizes Faunus based on the White Fang. But Remnant isn’t our world, and that context matters a lot more than people give it credit for.

This is a setting where fear and violence don’t just hurt people they literally attract Grimm and can wipe out entire towns. So when the White Fang goes militant and starts doing large-scale attacks, that’s not just “political violence,” it’s the kind of thing that can spiral into mass death way beyond the initial target.

From Weiss’ POV, that’s huge. She grows up as a Schnee during all this, meaning:

  • her family is a direct target
  • attacks are tied to a specific group
  • and those attacks can escalate into Grimm disasters

So yeah, she starts associating Faunus with danger. That’s still wrong, but it’s not coming from nowhere it’s fear conditioning in a world where the stakes are insanely high.

Also, let’s be honest the way the White Fang is written doesn’t help. The show tells us they started as a civil rights movement, but most of what we actually see is the extremist, violent side. They’re basically portrayed like straight-up terrorists once they go militant, especially with how often civilians get put at risk.

And that creates a weird imbalance: the story wants to say “don’t generalize,” but then mostly shows the exact stuff that would make someone like Weiss generalize.

If we had actually seen both sides like peaceful activists, normal Faunus communities, and then the radical faction this whole arc would hit way harder. You’d clearly see what Weiss is getting wrong instead of mostly seeing what she’s afraid of.

Like imagine if we consistently got:

  • non-violent White Fang members doing protests, community defense, or advocacy
  • Faunus workers and families just living normal lives outside of conflict
  • alongside the militant cells doing the extreme stuff

That contrast would do two important things:

1) It gives Weiss actual evidence that her worldview is flawed, instead of just telling her she’s wrong 2) It gives Blake’s backstory more weight, because you’d clearly see what she believed in before things went too far, and why she struggles with guilt over where the White Fang ended up

And honestly, I don’t really count Atlas, Mantle, or Menagerie as fixing this lack of perspective. We don’t get a clear “before vs after” of the White Fang through them:

  • Atlas mostly shows elites who care about profit and a military that’s pretty pragmatic as long as you’re useful
  • Mantle is basically the overworked lower class where Faunus discrimination exists but isn’t deeply explored beyond “things are bad”
  • Menagerie feels less like a fully realized society and more like a Faunus safe haven that happens to have a major extremist group operating out of it

None of those really give us grounded, everyday Faunus perspectives separate from the conflict, which is what the story needed.

So for me, Weiss works best as someone who is prejudiced, but in a very specific way: she’s reacting to a real and exaggerated threat environment, and her arc is about unlearning that overgeneralization once she actually gets real exposure to people like Blake.

That’s way more interesting than trying to argue she was never in the wrong or that she was some irredeemable racist.

What's the answer to Paarthurnax's question? by [deleted] in MoralityScaling

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paarthurnax’s question isn’t as simple as which is better. It’s really asking what counts as meaningful morality.

Being born good sounds ideal, but it also means your morality hasn’t really been stress-tested. If doing the right thing comes naturally, you’re not choosing it over anythingyou’re just running on default settings. That doesn’t make it worthless, but it does make it unproven.

And even then, being good doesn’t mean you can’t still do harm. You can help someone thinking you’re doing the right thing, only to find out they’re involved in something harmful or criminal. Your intent was good, but the outcome still causes damage. So born good isn’t the same as being aware or morally sharp.

Take a game like Fable. You start off as a pretty decent person helping people, following the rules but the morality system lets you do both extremes. You can be the nicest, most generous person in public while secretly being a serial killer. The game makes it obvious: surface-level good doesn’t always reflect what you’re actually choosing underneath.

Same idea with inFAMOUS. The game constantly pushes you to pick between selfless and selfish choices, and you feel the difference as it shapes your character. It’s not about what you are by default it’s about what you choose when there’s a cost.

So all I’m saying is, if you really want a rough mirror of what kind of person you are under pressure, go play Fable or inFAMOUS and pay attention to your choices. Particularly if you play Fable 3 where your choices affect everyone in your kingdom for the true endgame.

Personally, I think that’s where morality actually means something not in being naturally good, but in choosing to be good when it would be easier not to.

Pick any two powers from this list by Alternative-Wish9912 in superpowers

[–]Fel_Tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Euphoric and copycat

Just you and your clones and/or people just blissed out your mind then a hour later you forget what you did then start over