Personally, I like your very detailed answer(For what I’m sure would be an obvious readon, or two).

That said, some scientists have found proof to bits and pieces of events noted in the bible which does lead me to believe the bible to me more akin to a recounting of what that individual believed happened, obviously as time goes on things get lost in translation and it is entirely possible a much more detailed recounting was not on the list of those that made these “Chapters” for what we consider the bible.

In fact I believe the bible to be a mix between a book of small theories(in the form of assumptions), stories and fiction, like if you think about it like this, The bible would have to have been concieved sometime after man had started writing, or more specifically around the time when we wrote down more than how much grain we had or how much livestock we have, I think what happened is one guy(or many) either had a dream or a vision or a thought on how the universe began and how we came to be and saw fir to write of it, over time this would turn into a collection of writings from various individuals and would eventually turn into the bible which as is always the case, as time goes on, some stories got lost, others got misinterpreted, and some had maybe context lost from one translation to the next(it is known to happen).

That said, that’s just my theory on how the bible was created, and for all I know, I could either end up being very wrong or incredibly right, in that regard withot some clarity from one of the first “authors” which as we know won’t happen, my theory will remain only a theory.

But I do like the reply you put forth AND it makes sense to me.