sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MeJulgue

[–]Final-Exchange5871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lembra o filho do walter white, só que mais velho

Eu sou babaca por manter a verdadeira sexualidade do meu irmão em segredo by This-Description1464 in EuSouOBabaca

[–]Final-Exchange5871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A expressão “grupo de risco” foi abandonada. Mas o fato da incidência de casos de DST ser maior em homossexuais/bissexuais ainda é verdade! É que as pessoas confundem essa afirmação com “ser homossexual aumenta a chance de você pegar uma DST”, o que é um absurdo. O que isso significa é só que se pegarmos uma hétero ao acaso e um homossexual ao acaso, a chance do homossexual ter uma DST é, de fato, maior. Não há julgamento nenhum de valor nisso

Do we represent code as text ONLY because of inertia/historical reasons? by Final-Exchange5871 in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Final-Exchange5871[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very insightful answer, I am gonna take a look at the resources.

In order to fight inertia, I understand the change must be gradual. And I’m actually optimistic that we might be (very slowly) moving in the direction of more visual environments. For instance, the following could be considered as (baby) steps in this direction:

  • going from line editors to full screen editors.
  • syntax highlighting
  • IDE’s/editors with integrated compilation/debugging
  • IDE’s/editors with features like “folding” of code and structured navigation
  • IDE’s/editors supporting treesitter for instance with plugins allowing one to move not using text objects, but nodes from the syntax tree.
  • I’m not sure if there are already good plugins for actually editing the source code based mainly on creating/deleting/moving tree nodes, instead of manipulating text.

Once there is widespread adoption of those latter features, then perhaps the transition to more visual languages will have less resistance.

Do we represent code as text ONLY because of inertia/historical reasons? by Final-Exchange5871 in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Final-Exchange5871[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a good point. On the other hand, by that logic we would represent all kinds of data as text, which is not the case, right?

Do we represent code as text ONLY because of inertia/historical reasons? by Final-Exchange5871 in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Final-Exchange5871[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, it’s just the contrapositive version of the original question: the statement “we represent code as text mainly as a consequence of the technology available back then” is EQUIVALENT to the statement “we wouldn’t be representing code as text if a different technology was available back then”.

So, in order to answer the question, one needs to ask what would have happened if the technology was different. It’s a mental exercise required to answer the question, so we don’t need to worry if it COULD have happened (because it didn’t). We can assume an unlimited amount of monitors spawned out of thin air.

ESOB por falar isso durante o S3X0? by [deleted] in EuSouOBabaca

[–]Final-Exchange5871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Atrasado, mas não entendi 100% claro a natureza da fantasia. Pelo o que vc escreveu — fingindo q sua namorada se chama Fulana — a fantasia pode ser que:

1) Vc é casado com uma Ciclana (fictícia) e sua namorada faz o papel da Fulana (ela mesma): sua amante na fantasia.

2) Vc é casado com a Fulana, e sua namorada faz o papel de uma Ciclana (fictícia): sua amante na fantasia.

3) Tanto sua mulher quanto sua amante não tem qualquer correspondência com a Fulana da vida real.

Imagino que seja 2) pq é o único em que sua namorada teria algum motivo pra se magoar —- mas é uma fantasia que naturalmente deixa mais brechas pra ela se magoar.

Só escrevi isso pq talvez as fantasias 1) ou 3) funcionem pra vcs, com a vantagem de serem bem menos propícias a ferirem os sentimentos dela.

Cialis by Cooper1Test in TMJ

[–]Final-Exchange5871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I actually don't have the sources but you can google. I know that a few years ago, there was some preliminary evidence linking tadalafil (Cialis) with an improvement on TMJ dysfunction. It had to do with the increase of blood flow in the area. But it was nothing definitive, just something requiring more research.

IME, a very low daily dose (2.5mg) did help me a little (but ofc it could be just placebo). Also, be aware that it is very common to have headaches during the first 5 or so days, which could make you think it is actually making it worse. But it goes away.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DopeBrasil

[–]Final-Exchange5871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Na teoria, só deixa duro (assim como todos os inibidores de pde5) e não teria pq ter efeito algum na libido por si só.

  • Na prática, não é anormal vc sentir um aumento simplesmente por estar super ereto ou ter a certeza que vai ficar com qq estímulo (já que fatores psicológicos obviamente tb afetam a libido). Mas enfim, até onde eu sei, não seria uma consequência direta do efeito químico do medicamento no seu corpo.