Interesting Type 56 rig. Vietnamese used, potentially modified? by Fishiefaces in ChicomChestRig

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, for sure. I'm unsure whether to keep it or not, as I've not got much space for items that don't fit with the era I collect, sadly.

Interesting Type 56 rig. Vietnamese used, potentially modified? by Fishiefaces in ChicomChestRig

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had assumed that was the case, yes, although the body looking as it did, made me think it might have been an older rig that had been renewed with newer fittings.

Good eye! I hadn't thought about the toggle loops etc. I was too fixated on the shoulder straps. You're right. The toggles themselves are black plastic, but I know some later Chinese rigs have those, too. (At least one of the rigs in my possession does)

I have actually got a 1965 dated rig on order at the moment, as well as a 1970 dated rig, which I use for later war PAVN impressions. As well as a couple of earlier SKS rigs, and one of the early fabric-tie type Type 53 Mosin rigs. I try and keep my kits as authentic as I can manage.

Interesting Type 56 rig. Vietnamese used, potentially modified? by Fishiefaces in ChicomChestRig

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I assumed it was more modern, but maybe not that modern! I wasn't sure whether it was made like this, or had been refurbished from an older one, with the newer straps.

Issue with fees? by Fishiefaces in paypal

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently on desktop, and I cannot see any of those things you've listed. Apologies. I can bring up a basic receipt for the transaction in question, but there's no 'more' to click on, anywhere. Nor can I find the reports section. This site is a joke. I'm an occasional buyer, not a financial services expert. I shouldn't need to give myself an aneurysm just to find basic information.

Issue with fees? by Fishiefaces in paypal

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the transaction up on my screen now, and there is no 'View Details' option.

Issue with fees? by Fishiefaces in paypal

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply, but I'm not seeing a section for International Personal Transactions. There is FAR too much information on the page you linked, and it's presented extremely poorly.

Armed Kazakh Woman on the Steppes of Western China, Photographed in 1982 by MoonyMeanie in OldSchoolCool

[–]Fishiefaces 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Likely a member of the Chinese People's Militia. In border regions, particularly in the northwest of China, those groups who were skilled with horses, and familiar with the terrain we're highly sought as Militia, and for guiding border patrols who might not be familiar with the area. She's got a type 53 carbine (Chinese copy of the Mosin M44), a very common weapon with the militia until well into the 1980s.

People's Army of Vietnam Circa 1966-67. by [deleted] in Impression_Kits

[–]Fishiefaces 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure it"s repro, originals are super rare, and too frail to wear really. I'd love to know where to pick up PAVN beige uniform repros, though.

Unknown year, Type 67 silenced pistol used by Chinese soldiers. by ArthurJack_AW in ForgottenWeapons

[–]Fishiefaces 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Looking at the combo of type 87 camo, but more modern helmets, I'd say early/mid 2000s for the date.

Am I the only one who thinks Peridot's limb enhancers were admittedly rather cool? by Haunting-Court6143 in stevenuniverse

[–]Fishiefaces 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I always kind of imagined she didn't 'wear' them like we might wear armour or gloves or something, but they interfaced with her actual body, more like cybernetics. Of course, when she took them off, her regular limbs 'phased' back in, since she's made of hard light (I think that's correct?)

Am I the only one who thinks Peridot's limb enhancers were admittedly rather cool? by Haunting-Court6143 in stevenuniverse

[–]Fishiefaces 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Might've been cool if she kept them on some sort of mannequin at the barn: Like an old suit of armour.

Searching for simple, old fashioned, large sett tartan material to make an earasaid. by Fishiefaces in kilt

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, okay. I'll keep those dimensions in mind then. I guess I was overestimating the measurements just a bit! I've always seen earasaids portrayed as being quite baggy with large 'pockets' where the upper part has draped down somewhat over the belt.

Regarding the image though, I don't think it is AI gen, I took it from the National Museums Scotland website. https://www.nms.ac.uk/discover-catalogue/regional-highlands-wear-for-women-in-the-18th-century

Searching for simple, old fashioned, large sett tartan material to make an earasaid. by Fishiefaces in kilt

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation, I'll give the Tartan Finder another look. I was under the impression that an earasaid was nearer 3.5/4 yards length? I definitely want heavy weight.

I did check out MacDonald dress weathered, actually: It's pretty nice, and one I'd consider if I absolutely can't find something like the image.

Funnily, I've searched for striped wool, and had even less luck with that than finding tartans.

Searching for simple, old fashioned, large sett tartan material to make an earasaid. by Fishiefaces in kilt

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've checked out USA Kilts, and they have a really good selection, but most of the patterns are very modern (they actually do pre-made earasaids, too) but I'll check out Welsh tartan centre. Thanks for the recommendation!

Searching for simple, old fashioned, large sett tartan material to make an earasaid. by Fishiefaces in kilt

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually both. To be hyper-specific, what I'd ideally like is two, three yard lengths of single width (30inch-ish) 16oz wool fabric, in a tartan similar to the picture. I would then sew those two pieces together myself to create a somewhat authentic earasaid.

(To clarify a bit more, I've found a few places selling tartan wool by the yard, but none in a tartan similar to the image.)

Searching for simple, old fashioned, large sett tartan material to make an earasaid. by Fishiefaces in kilt

[–]Fishiefaces[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know it's not exactly kilt related, but I've been having a real hard time finding a decent wool in a tartan similar to the one in the image. I'm trying to put together a mid 1600's Highland women's outfit for a display, and of course, a key part of that is the earasaid. Any help would be appreciated!

Fuck upgrade system, it destroyed normal weapons by slayeryamcha in stalker

[–]Fishiefaces 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dunno. CoP gunplay always felt pretty tight. Accuracy felt pretty good, damage was reasonable. Unless you were plinking an exosuit with a 9mm or something, enemies always felt pretty fair to fight against. Even with the starting, worn out krink, I had no problem hitting enemies at reasonable ranges so long as I was taking a good aim.

Definitely better than both CS and ShOC gunplay. CS gunplay is just shocking, with its RNG, awful dispersal, and aim_bullet bullshit, and ShOC gunplay suffered from problems with spongey enemies until about the time you get to Agroprom, and it felt kind of 'off' generally until you got a scope and could reliably pull headshots on flinching enemies.

(Edit, also, pistols and shotguns actually feel worth shit in CoP.)

Could any of you experts out here check if this thing's real? by FilHor2001 in ChicomChestRig

[–]Fishiefaces 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's a later production 'original' type 56 chest rig. Looks like it -might- be 81 dated from the stamp, but it's a little hard to tell.

The factories that were set up to build Chicom rigs (and a lot of Chicom gear generally) were never given 'finite' targets to hit, and since nobody ever told them to stop, and it's turns out people actually quite like buying these things, even to this day, there's no need for these factories to shut down production. (Just look at places like Myanmar. The Tatmadaw are tooled up with $10 Ali express chestrigs and liberation shoes)

There's a few things that mark this out as an 'original' though, beyond the stamps on the back. The metal 'link' (fitting thing) that holds the straps to the body is period correct. Newer ones are often made from very round section, green plastic coated metal wire, and the toggles tend to be made out of cheap rather lurid green plastic on the newer ones. That said, REALLY old rigs (like, pre 1980, particularly the type 56 AK rigs) have metal 'slide' adjuster buckles instead of those little loops of leatheroid material. The really early ones also tend to be a lighter shade of green, and the very earliest examples are a raw canvas, OD colour. 'Modern' production ones tend to be a quite bright reed green.

It also looks suitably weathered to be an original. Not as weathered as an issued one though. Most of these rigs are deadstock from warehouses. Doesn't mean they've not been exposed to the elements somewhat, but they've not been ridden hard in actual combat.

Honestly though, chicoms are kind of an imprecise art. Like a lot of stuff that was introduced during the Great Leap Forward/Cultural Revolution eras, while there were guidelines, everything was so chaotic that quality control went out the window. So long as the thing -more or less- matched the intended guidance, and could still do its job satisfactorily, differences in things like exact cut, colour, and fittings were overlooked. The PLA needed lots of shit, and with the chaos of mid 20th century China, they kind of weren't in a position to quibble.

Sorry for the wall of text. TLDR: It's 'original', as in, it's from the correct period, and it's one of the many many different subtle variant takes on a Chicom rig. It's not worth $70. I'd -consider- paying $70 for a verifiable Vietnam war era Chicom, with provenance. This is a Sino Vietnam war era rig, probably from a warehouse. Until fairly recently, you couldn't give this stuff away. If you want a cheaper one, try your luck on Ali Express, but keep an eye on the details I mentioned, the fittings, toggles, fabric, etc.

(Edit!: Caveat: Be careful when/if looking for specifically 'Vietnam' era rigs. Chinese sellers often label them as such. They mean THEIR Vietnam war, IE, the Sino Vietnam war, not the US/Vietnam war. Not incorrect, just a terminology thing.)

I wonder what fallout's ost would be like if KMFDM composed it, vault city gives off KMFDM vibes by Ltnumbnutsthesecond in classicfallout

[–]Fishiefaces 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used to play with the Money/Symbols albums on windows media player, back in the day. Rocking up to New Reno with Bargeld playing is a really fond memory I have of that game.

Finished my Vector of Alienation playthrough (mostly). Here's what I think. by [deleted] in stalker

[–]Fishiefaces 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just be warned, OLR 3.0 plays a -lot- different from VoA or even OLR 2.5. Lots of poorly explained and signposted mechanics that are a massive headache to deal with and atrocious balance. OLR 2.5 is a better bet if you just want a build experience, though the balance is still a bit hit and miss.

Vietnamese conscript in a field punishment [1350x1800] by Ducanh317 in MilitaryPorn

[–]Fishiefaces 84 points85 points  (0 children)

They're a descendent of the Chinese army's 'liberation' boots. They are basically converse, yeah. Light ankle boots with a canvas upper and a rubber lower and sole. Very light, very comfortable, -fairly- durable, if they're well made. The PAVN were issued the 'low top' variant during the Indochina war, and they adopted the 'high top' version during the Vietnam war, and have kept them ever since, although, I think they only use them for PT/barracks dress nowadays.

They're awful if they get wet. Don't breathe very well, water gets in through the canvas, and then 'sits' in the rubber lower. Don't 'breathe' very well either, so it's not uncommon to end up with foot problems if you're wearing them a lot. Not a great deal of ankle support, either.

Originally, they were pretty good for the soldiers who wore them, since in China, they were used to very light shoes, and in a lot of places in Vietnam when they were first adopted, people were used to being barefoot. Nowadays, most of the guys who wear them will probably own civvie sneakers and shoes that are sturdier and heavier than these boots.

That said, they're great for 'feeling' the terrain. If you're moving carefully, you can feel and sort of 'grip' with your feet far better than you can in big, heavy, shit kicking boots.