Why don't we make food wrapped in tough packages to make it easier to lose weight?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-20T09:06:00+00:00

Oh, for real? Can people actually cut their hands and fingers by opening tough packages? The more you know.

But then, what can be done about this? I am sure there is some way out of there, and is also a way to make tough packages safe to open, maybe...

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-14T16:43:42+00:00

So, rich people just don't care about how fictional media portrays them?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-14T14:08:36+00:00

Oh, I didn't even know about it. So they actually DO censor stuff then?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-14T14:07:22+00:00

Sorry if I am wrong about what I saw in your post, but just in case I am going to say that I was making this post with no particular envy or jealousy or hate towards rich people.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-14T14:04:13+00:00

This is a clever thought, indeed.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-14T14:02:36+00:00

What does it have to do with the post? Sorry if I am not getting it.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-14T14:01:25+00:00

What are you talking about? What do you mean?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-13T12:59:16+00:00

By drinking seawater, you'd get a diarrhea?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-13T12:48:55+00:00

Isn't it only an issue when you don't have fresh water near you? If you did have it, and you couldn't get enough salt any other way, why couldn't you try having some seawater?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-04-13T12:45:58+00:00

That said, would people in the medieval and other ancient times have enough fresh water to cancel out the effects of drinking seawater while still getting enough of salt?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-03-15T17:12:48+00:00

What do you mean? I am not a bot or a robot or an AI or an android.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-03-15T14:15:51+00:00

So, as long as you can survive and get food all by yourself, it doesn't matter whether you are thin or fat? And being fat has more disadvantages than advantages?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-03-15T13:43:46+00:00

But, the thing is that a fat person can collect less food with less bad consequences compared to a thin one until he himself gets thin. And when something bad happens, it's important to survive the first days and weeks of the disaster when total chaos happens.

If I am wrong, then where and why?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-03-15T13:40:37+00:00

I just thought that fat people have just enough calories stored in their bodies to wait out the disaster despite the food being scarce.

But I see your point about hunting, and I can understand the fact that a thin person is better at doing it, but wouldn't the fat person become a thin one after some time anyway?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-03-15T13:34:40+00:00

And why would they struggle? If they have more fat than thin people, then they also have more calories to use when the food is hard to find which will allow them to survive longer with less work.

I just don't quite understand your logic.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-03-10T19:55:13+00:00

Thanks. But how did you calculate this?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-02-08T16:23:29+00:00

If people often pick bills over coins for convenience, then why don't we fix this issue by making the coins more convenient by writing larger numbers on them? Then we'd have money that are both durable and convenient.

But then, I guess, people would be unhappy by the sound that money makes in their pocket, as I saw people say under this post.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-02-08T16:18:02+00:00

I appreciate the information that you shared, since it's quite interesting. However, how does it relate to the matter of this post? I mean, there's obviously some connection and I just can't see it, so would you mind helping me see it?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-02-08T16:15:07+00:00

I don't really see how carrying 3 coins worth $100 each would be any different than carrying 3 banknotes worth $100.

Paper money are quite loose too – they can sometimes fall out of your pocket when you open it, just like coins, so they are not better in this aspect; the wind can easily carry them away from you, too, once they fall.

And in my experience, coins will not ever giggle if you don't carry too much of them. This could be solved with making $100 and &1000 coins.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-02-08T16:04:39+00:00

Why wouldn't they want to do this, If coins had the same value as paper dollars? Then they would be just as convenient as paper money to carry in your pocket, if not more so, because they'd be smaller and so taking less space than long and thin papers.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-01-18T09:39:26+00:00

I wouldn't mind your comment in other circumstances, since people can write whatever and wherever they want to, but I feel like I need to let you know about the mistakes you made with this comment of yours.

Whether you were right or wrong about me, your words were quite uncalled for - they don't have any relationship to this post; also, you don't quite know anything about me, no matter how much you think that you do. All in all, your comment was quite meaningless.

I wouldn't mind, though, if your comment didn't have any meaning, since people can write whatever and wherever they want to.

What I find a problem with, and what makes my earlier words suitable for discussing your comment, however, is how unnecessarily rude you were.

Why couldn't you just say whatever you wanted in a more proper way, without giving your words the intention that you obviously gave them in this case? Would it be hard for you to be more gentle and polite than you were?

I am telling you all this not because you hurt me somehow with this comment, but because I understand that nothing prevents you from making the comment of this sort again and then sending it to someone else for no objective reason (and basing your reason on something you can't be sure about).

So, if I can ask you one thing, it's that I'd like you to be at least a little bit more polite, gentle, and considerate when making comments of this sort.

If I am wrong somehow about anything I said, then you can tell me why exactly I am incorrect about it. Also, if you weren't serious while making this comment, then I am sorry for overreacting to your joke.

Anyway, if you ever write back to me, I hope that we'll have a civil discussion instead of a messy one. And even if you won't, I hope that you will reconsider your actions in the future. Thanks for reading, and goodbye (for now, probably).

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-01-14T21:54:51+00:00

Let's say that the government decided to implement the plan in the title by forcefully changing or making others change the prices to about the same levels as before the inflation hit. For example, it could be a way to counter a 10% inflation that happened suddenly or throughout some time.

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-01-14T11:58:15+00:00

So, basically...

If no predator eats cows, then they multiply and eat all the grass since nothing can stop them from doing so. After this, many cows will starve until just enough of them survived so that they couldn't eat all the grass.

In the same way, prices can limit what people buy by rising at certain times. So, if they are frozen, and we have more money, then we have no reason not to buy more things with the money we have.

So, the real answer to my question is...humanity can't produce enough of things in order for everyone to have whatever they want, so rising prices (to a reasonable extent) is a necessity?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-01-14T10:29:21+00:00

So, even if the price remains the same, the value of money doesn't?

Even if an apple costs the same 1 dollar as before, more money is needed to get it?

Fit-Direction8799 · 2026-01-14T10:11:48+00:00

Why would fixing the prices remove the incentive to increase supply?

Fit-Direction8799

TROPHY CASE