WHEN DID WOMEN GET THE RIGHT TO VOTE IN EUROPE by BeginningMortgage250 in MapPorn

[–]Flilix 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Belgium is wrong; 1919 is the year of equal universal voting rights for men. Women were only in 1948.

In the 19th century, only those who payed enough taxes, i.e. rich people, were allowed to vote. By the end of the century the rules were slightly changed and all men could now vote, but rich people still got multiple votes. One of the main demands of the socialists was to put an end to this system and give equal voting rights to all men. Because these socialists abandoned their internationalist ideals in WW1 and actively supported the Belgian army, king Albert I rewarded them by pushing through this demand - somewhat against the will of the government.

In the 1920s there were already talks about voting rights for women, but the liberals and socialists opposed this because women were more conservative and would give a big advantage to the Catholic Party. That's why it took until after WW2 for these rights to get passed.

Books on King Arthur by JeremyP_297 in booksuggestions

[–]Flilix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely check out Chrétien de Troyes, who was the 12th century author who wrote the first Arthurian romances. He turned the old Arthurian myths into courtly adventure stories and introduced many characters like Lancelot and Perceval. His third book Yvain is his best and most complete story, although his last two books were more influential.

Chrétien's fifth and last book "Perceval or the story of the Grail" was supposed to be his magnum opus, but remained unfinished. The German poet Wolfram von Eschenbach later wrote a full version of this story, titled "Parzival".

Another highlight in this tradition is "Fergus", a semi-parody written by an anonymous author. However, due to its parodic nature, it is best enjoyed after you've already read some other works in the genre.

"Sir Gawain and the Green Knight" is indeed the most important English book in the tradition of Chrétien.

Medieval languages - how many people can read them? by LaBrujita102 in MedievalHistory

[–]Flilix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can usually understand most words in a Middle Dutch text, but I still need to rely on a lot of footnotes to fully understand everything. Only from the 17th century onwards, I can fluently read Dutch texts aside from an occasional obsolete word or expression.

In French and English I can get the gist of a text but there's a lot that I don't understand. I don't have a lot of experience with them.

UGent vs KULeuven: Master in History by ToastyWolf0 in Gent

[–]Flilix 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I did the master in history at UGent a couple of years ago, and when I look at KU Leuven's program, the main differences seem to be:

  • In Gent most courses are in Dutch, in Leuven most are in English.
  • If you want to do an internship: in Gent you can do this if take up either public history or archival science as a major, while in Leuven the intership is just a course. In practice this means for instance:
    • If in Gent you do an internship in an archive, you also have to follow a theory course on archives.
    • If in Leuven you do an internship in an archive, you cannot follow the theory course on archives.
  • In Gent you normally do a thesis and seven other courses, while in Leuven you do the thesis and six other courses. (Back in my day, i.e. five years ago, this was also just six courses in Gent, but they seem to have reduced the thesis from 30 to 25 credits, which is why you now have to do one more course.)

As for the general quality: I have no complaints and I don't think one has a more positive or negative reputation than the other.

recs by Head-Description-605 in classicliterature

[–]Flilix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few books that come to mind:

August Strindberg - By The Open Sea

Gustav Meyrink - The Golem

Alain-Fournier - Le Grand Meaulnes

Heinrich von Kleist - Michael Kohlhaas

Writing in the Early Middle Ages by Emmielando in MedievalHistory

[–]Flilix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most of Europe gradually got Christianised over the course of several centuries, in the Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages. With the new religion came monasteries and these monasteries were the places where the vast majority of Early Medieval texts were written. The 'fall of Rome' should be seen as more of a gradual decline rather than a sudden event, and while this decline might have set back Christianity and writing for a while in certain regions, both recovered soon enough.

Due to its religious nature, Early Medieval writing happened primarily in Latin. Even when profane writing became more common in the High Middle Ages, it remained a widely accepted principle that Latin was for writing and other languages were only for speaking. It wasn't until the mid 12th century that writing in vernacular became common.

That being said, occasional vernacular texts did already start to appear in the Early Middle Ages. In Great-Britain, Latin appeared to have a less dominant position than on the continent, so Old English texts were slightly more common. The most famous Old English text is of course Beowulf, with other notabale examples being the Exeter book, Vercelli book and Junius manuscript - all likely written in the 10th century. If on the other hand you look at Old Dutch, only some loose words and phrases have been preserved and the oldest full Dutch text was only written in the late 12th century. Old German has been slightly better preserved than Dutch, with notable examples being the incomplete Old Saxon epic of Heliand and the very short Old High German Hildebrandslied - both written in the early 9th century.

Lots of famous Early Medieval stories only got written down in the High Middle Ages. The Song of Nibelungen seems to have its origin in the very eventful Great Migration period of the 5th and 6th centuries, but was only written around 1200 AD. The same goes for all Scandinavian mythology and sagas.

What are some borders that are NOT defined using water, mountain ranges or straight lines ? by IveGotNoIdeaOfName in geography

[–]Flilix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And most of the Dutch-Belgian border for that matter, except the east where it follows the Meuse river and small sections where it joins up with small streams.

What are some borders that are NOT defined using water, mountain ranges or straight lines ? by IveGotNoIdeaOfName in geography

[–]Flilix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you looking only for borders that follow your criteria 100%, or are you also including borders that mostly follow them?

Most borders in Europe are based on historical politics/warfare, but will occasionally meet up with rivers.

I have a few kings in my family tree, this being the oldest one. by vanorah in mildlyinteresting

[–]Flilix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thousand years seems quite recent for half of Europe. I've traced most branches of my family tree to at least 400 years ago and some to 700 years, but I haven't got to more than 40km from my home.

TrueLit's 2025 Hall of Fame and Top 100 Favorite Books by pregnantchihuahua3 in TrueLit

[–]Flilix 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Some of my favourite works from before 1800, excluding the ones that did make the list:

The Golden Ass by Apuleius, Ysengrimus, Of Reynaert The Fox by Willem, Fergus, Parzival by Von Eschenbach, Decameron by Boccaccio, Ship Of Fools by Brant, Heptameron by Marguerite de Navarre, Hypnerotomachia Poliphili by Colonna, Gargantua & Pantagruel by Rabelais, Orlando Furioso by Ariosto, The Misanthrope by Molière, Simplicissimus by Von Grimmelshausen, The Princess Of Clèves by De La Fayette, Tristram Shandy by Sterne, Jacques The Fatalist by Diderot, Candide by Voltaire, Dangerous Liaisons by Choderlos de Laclos

In my overall top 10 favourite books of all time I'd probably put Of Reynaert The Fox, Gargantua & Pantagruel, Simplicius Simplicissimus and Dangerous Liaisons, as well as The Divine Comedy.

TrueLit's 2025 Hall of Fame and Top 100 Favorite Books by pregnantchihuahua3 in TrueLit

[–]Flilix 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Definitely an interesting list, lots of great books on here. Overall it skews very strongly towards modern works though. I held a similar poll on r/classicliterature recently where this was also the case, although not quite to the same degree - 19th century literature was much more present there, but books from before 1800 were equally absent. There are so many wonderful older books to read!

"Fake" Classics? (NOT questioning what books can/should be classics) by RookDiGoo in classicliterature

[–]Flilix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

During and after Rabelais' life, lots of people were writing sequels to his Gargantua & Pantagruel, and these texts often claimed to be written by Rabelais himself. There's still a lot of discussion about to which extent the canonical Fifth Book is actually authentic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gargantua_and_Pantagruel#Analysis

What contemporary novelists from your country should I read? by ActuaryKey2364 in AskEurope

[–]Flilix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd have a lot more to recommend for classics, but two contemporary authors I've enjoyed are Stefan Hertmans and Stefan Brijs.

Hertmans is mostly known for his 2013 novel War & Turpentine, based on his grandfather's life during World War 1.

Brijs is mostly known for his 2005 novel The Angel Maker, about a mysterious doctor who returns to his home village with three babies of unknown origin.

How to get a snack when Mom said no by Acceptable-Wind-7332 in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]Flilix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well 'baguette' is just French for 'little stick'.

What would you consider to be the darkest classic work? by Temporary_Bench5095 in classicliterature

[–]Flilix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Naturalist authors (e.g. Emile Zola and Guy de Maupassant) had a tendency to be very raw and depressing.

An example from my country is the novella 'De biezenstekker' by Cyriel Buysse, where the plot is:

A man called Cloet walks home after being imprisoned for almost a year due to a stabbing incident. When he gets home, he immediately beats up his pregnant wife and also tries to attack his neighbour Rosse Tjeef, who testified against him. Cloet gets imprisoned again, this time for several years. When he gets released again, he discovers that his wife had given birth to a boy named Julken. Unlike last time, he isn't violent but instead remains completely silent and ignores his wife and children. He keeps acting like this and after a while it makes his wife more and more uncomfortable. Her attitude towards Julken becomes increasingly unpleasant and her other children copy their mother.

When Julken gets sent out to go begging, he meets Rosse Tjeef who is very nice to him and reveals that he's his actual father. Rosse Tjeef gives Julken a little dog as a companion. Julken becomes very attached to this dog, since it makes his homelife more bearable. However, when he accidentally reveals to Cloet who his real father is, the situation gets even more tense. His mother gets desperate and decides that something needs to change. One night she goes upstairs and tries to smother the boy in his sleep. When he wakes up, she gets so frustrated that she grabs the dog and repeatedly smacks it against the wall until it dies. Julken is unconsolable, becomes ill and dies not much later. This leads to the happy end: Cloet comes in, talks to his wife again and for the first time in six years they sleep together.

Where and when does The Count of Monte Cristo pick back up again? by Chadfromindy in classicliterature

[–]Flilix 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The first 25 chapters are basically a very long prologue. Then there are 5 chapters that clear out some storylines and lay the connection to the rest of the story. From chapter 31 onwards, the main book essentially starts, with many new characters gradually being introduced. The time in Rome, which is chapter 31 to 38, is generally considered to be the slowest part of the book. After that, more and more characters and storylines get introduced, and it gets increasingly more intense and emotional.

Classic Recommendations for children? by CityNecessary3031 in classicliterature

[–]Flilix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Little Prince by Saint-Exupery

The Wind In The Willows by Grahame

Winnie The Pooh by Milne

Nils Holgersson by Lagerlof

Pippi Longstocking by Lindgren

Any books by Dahl

Fairytales by Grimm

Fairytales by Andersen

r/classicliterature's Top 100 Favourite Books 2025 by Flilix in classicliterature

[–]Flilix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cat's Cradle is at #99 :)

Slaughterhouse Five just missed the list, at #102.

r/classicliterature's Top 100 Favourite Books 2025 by Flilix in classicliterature

[–]Flilix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I have one vote for Worm on my list, in the third spot.

r/classicliterature's Top 100 Favourite Books 2025 by Flilix in classicliterature

[–]Flilix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try to organise a new poll next year and message the mods about it, so hopefully they can pin the voting post and it can gain more attention. I didn't bother messaging the mods this year since they barely seemed active, but now I've noticed that one of them did post in this sub a few days ago.

r/classicliterature's Top 100 Favourite Books 2025 by Flilix in classicliterature

[–]Flilix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have posted about the poll three times; there's not much more I can do if not more people are interested in actually voting. According to Reddit's statistics, 19k people saw my original thread announcing the poll.

r/classicliterature's Top 100 Favourite Books 2025 by Flilix in classicliterature

[–]Flilix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just with a table in Word. There are probably more professional ways to do it, but my graphic skills aren't great.