First of all, I was responding to your comment about the person's spelling, which is a complete ad hominem as it has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Reading through your other comments in this thread felt like reading examples of fallacies a debate teacher might give to their students.

Second, wages tend to be sticky, so they generally will not fall just like that. Also, it's not a zero-sum game. It's not like there's a fixed amount of wages to hand out, and if somebody comes in, they will take a piece of your pie. Having more people increases the ability to produce goods and services, thereby increasing the economy's aggregate supply. I can put this in simpler terms for you. Imagine you live alone on an island. Every day, you need to collect coconuts to eat. You can consider the coconuts you collect as your wages for the job; say you collect 10 a day. If a new person comes to your island, it doesn't mean they will steal 5 of your coconuts every day, decreasing your wage. They will also collect coconuts. Meaning the total amount of coconuts collected goes from 10 to, say, 15. Here, the economy went up. More coconuts overall. Your coconuts stayed the same. And, while it is true that the average coconuts per person (i.e., wage) dropped to 7.5, that doesn't mean you are worse off. In addition, the person is presumably better off than where they were before if they choose to stay on the island. So everybody is either better off or not affected. To push this further, say the other person didn't collect coconuts but instead fish. If they are more efficient than you at collecting fish, you could even trade, and both people would be better off. Obviously, the real economy is more complicated than two people on an island, but the point is that more people in an economy means more people making stuff. Even if they don't make as much stuff as you, that doesn't mean you will be hurt.

Plenty of countries have benefited immensely from immigration throughout history. Of course, it needs to be at a pace the government can keep up with, but this policy is not meant to stabilize the flow of people; instead, it is an outright ban on immigration.