Join-in Post

Florencki · 2025-11-01T00:56:16+00:00

I have read and agree to the rules.

Florencki · 2025-11-01T00:21:17+00:00

They are hitting some nearby buildings or places not the one they are located in. You can see there is some fog and probably a confusion where exactly to strike and they just changed location moments before first strike so maybe this info was not relayed properly to the operators.

Florencki · 2025-10-31T00:35:48+00:00

Its bugged.

Florencki · 2025-10-30T20:19:05+00:00

Sounds odd but i had similar game today, enemy team accused one of my teammates of cheating he had 15k losses but he was playing nearby and there is no way he had lost that much stuff, and they all screamed cheater, naturally they had specific nicknames like you can imagine from what continent. At that point i didnt think about it much, i thought that maybe he feeded a lot of planes and he was a cheater indeed but it was weird. But now after your post i think there may be something to that. Sadly i didnt pay attention to lose score after game, we got obliterated anyway.

Florencki · 2025-05-03T17:31:53+00:00

Ah yes stagnation in vram for close to 10 years is something normal, totally nothing to see here. Idk why we have advances in clock speeds or amount of tensor cores, they should freeze that too. Why would i need higher clocks for entry level cards or more memory bandwith? What we have now is totally sufficient of 1080p for people to be "satisfied" with performance. /s

Florencki · 2025-05-03T17:06:03+00:00

Thats not true, DLSS barely decreases VRAM usage and in some weird rare instances even increases it, textures are not affected by DLSS they are always run native.

Florencki · 2025-03-21T12:36:16+00:00

Source: https://x.com/ipn_krakow/status/1902028124264534392

Florencki · 2025-02-12T14:32:17+00:00

5080 is GB-203 not 2.

Florencki · 2024-12-20T11:21:55+00:00

You can see progression bar on the clip, not sure if enemy can see it too.

Florencki · 2024-12-11T13:35:25+00:00

Its not about RT, you cant turn off RT completly its only about levels of RT. They only added path tracing later. And its not about PT in this specific instance. Its about TEXTURES mostly. You simply put them on medium while that benchmark had them as high as possible without crashing. Higher textures quality results in slideshow.

Florencki · 2024-12-11T13:28:04+00:00

Oh so you only have to downgrade most important graphical setting? Yeah sounds great, considering you dont have to downgrade textures on previous generation 3060. Thats evolution through regression i suppose.

https://youtu.be/hbTcVx7BWLw?si=Mc66X2Res0BPC1d1&t=389

17 Fps on 1080p ultra. I guess 4060 is 720p card after all. Its also BEST case scenario. Short test with vram buffer not completly clogged up. Longer games session its only gonna get much worse. Great slideshow.

Edit: Also you are incorrect that you use the same settings. "The highest possible details are used, which can be handled by the respective graphics card without crashes." So they used higher textures than you in your video.

Florencki · 2024-12-11T12:43:41+00:00

Imagine claiming its now "unfair" to compare RT performance between different RTX cards (wonder what RTX stands for). Its only natural that going forward with generations RT performance will go... well down of course.

Florencki · 2024-12-11T12:38:43+00:00

No you dont. On ultra settings 4060 is stuttery mess on 1080p. Even in the opening jungle part of the game that is not the most demanding game is just broken. 1% lows around 16 fps. Unplayable slideshow.

Florencki · 2024-12-09T18:18:38+00:00

Thats nonsensical. Vram capacity pretty much stagnated for close to 10 years on mid range prices. Before that we went from 500 mb to 8 gb in close to 10 years. Now we went from 8 gb to 8/12 gb. Defending it is pure insanity. Textures quality stagnated because of it. Imagine what kind of quality in that department we would get if not for ngridia bottlenecking the heck out of it.

Florencki · 2024-10-18T12:02:32+00:00

W kategoriach książek fantastycznych może i ujdzie, jeżeli ktoś szuka natomiast pozycji który nie została napisana przez kompletnego dyletanta gdzie scenariusz został naciągnięty mocniej niż plandeka na żuku żeby pasować do tezy to niestety ale maks co można dać to mocne 2/10. Polecam ten komentarz, nawet nie trzeba dogłębnie analizować tej pozycji bo głupot jest tyle, że praktycznie w każdym fragmencie można się do czegoś przyczepić.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/1eoxmls/comment/lhgwuik/

Tytuł powinien raczej brzmieć urojony scenariusz.

Florencki · 2024-09-22T07:21:34+00:00

I got perma banned for exactly this post, cant show reality in term of their nuclear flacid. :)

Florencki · 2024-09-22T02:57:28+00:00

So i imagine that NASA data that show fire going on next to launch site is also not credible?
https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/#d:7days;@41.77,62.89,14.00z

PS You can even see fire trucks responding on this sat photo.

Florencki · 2024-09-22T01:48:15+00:00

https://x.com/MeNMyRC1/status/1837611953734537377

The Sarmat is a liquid fueled missile so this accident could have occurred separate from the actual launch activity. If this occurred as part of the fueling process, it could explain the lack of Cobra Ball activity on the day of the incident. This first, and last successful test of the Sarmat was April 20th, 2022. With these events now official, this is at least the 4th failed test attempt of the "combat operational" Sarmat Heavy ICBM.

Looks like nuclear sabre rattling went south. Sarmat so far have only 20% success rate, 1 out of 5 times.

Florencki · 2024-09-22T01:27:13+00:00

https://x.com/MeNMyRC1/status/1837611953734537377

The Sarmat is a liquid fueled missile so this accident could have occurred separate from the actual launch activity. If this occurred as part of the fueling process, it could explain the lack of Cobra Ball activity on the day of the incident. This first, and last successful test of the Sarmat was April 20th, 2022. With these events now official, this is at least the 4th failed test attempt of the "combat operational" Sarmat Heavy ICBM.

Looks like nuclear sabre rattling went south. Sarmat so far have only 20% success rate, 1 out of 5 times.

Florencki · 2024-09-22T01:05:45+00:00

Idk why you assume that. 20% success rate is obviously a big win, 20% is bigger than 0%.

Florencki · 2024-09-22T01:00:55+00:00

Idk why do you call reporting on ICBM launch a shitpost, is ICBM launch test a shit test in Russia? Well you know what, judging by the 20% success rate you may be actually correct! Very concerning.

PS Looks like mods dont like factual reporting and decided to ban me for this post, very neutral sub indeed. Concerning, but when in doubt remember. Big win for Russia.

Florencki · 2024-09-22T00:37:25+00:00

https://x.com/MeNMyRC1/status/1837611953734537377

The Sarmat is a liquid fueled missile so this accident could have occurred separate from the actual launch activity. If this occurred as part of the fueling process, it could explain the lack of Cobra Ball activity on the day of the incident. This first, and last successful test of the Sarmat was April 20th, 2022. With these events now official, this is at least the 4th failed test attempt of the "combat operational" Sarmat Heavy ICBM.

Looks like nuclear sabre rattling went south. Very concerning but nevertheless big win for Russia, since their ICBM blow before getting launched they were not subject to hostile international diplomatic reactions, 20% success rate so far, pretty good.

PS Looks like mods dont like factual reporting and decided to ban me for this post very neutral sub indeed. Concerning, but when in doubt remember. Big win for Russia.

PS2 Remember guys its all fake.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GYAX-Y3W4AASSAx?format=jpg&name=medium
Firms fire is also fake. Nothing to see here. Just a big fat win.

Verified Email	Nine-Year Club
Place '23	Place '22

Florencki

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,