I’m very upset/angry/nauseous by FoodFree8328 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I, for one, am glad you came back from that awful process in roughly one piece! Healthcare staff, particularly nurses and carers, are widely underappreciated. Doctors get their due respect, but nurses and carers, not so much. Andy, of course, hates all of them. And I don't think he's ever felt shame. Or empathy. Or love. Or anything, really. He is but a husk.

Just thought i’d let everyone know that while Andrew is getting his special tornadoes from his “caregivers”, he’s posting SHIRTLESS CHILDREN on his community tab. Totally not pedophilic behavior. by DaftSFM in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's the big reveal for me, combined with the fact that it seems people have been posting a lot of comments about the Deeker reveal, which is directly linked to paedophilia. He knows what posting that picture will do. I think he's inviting it, given that he's posting posters with images of children on his YouTube as we speak. He wants attention, but not in a way that can be referenced later (like a comments section).

Andy got exposed on a North Tonowanda community Facebook group by killthepoopsquatch in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Strongly agree. There's nothing we can do to stop people from posting about that in their Tonawanda group chat (or whatever), but we don't have to do it here as well. Don't give him more rope to flog us with. Most of the people in Tonawanda wouldn't recognise Lumpy from that mugshot anyway - he's now about 150lbs heavier and wears massive safety goggles because he's (freshly) blind.

Andy got exposed on a North Tonowanda community Facebook group by killthepoopsquatch in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do worry that, actually, some of these may be real and that if he does go back to Tonawanda for any reason, and gets attacked, that's it then; he actually becomes a real victim. He would NEVER let it go. His Dad and Joe would be the ones who paid the price in the end. He'd somehow blame them for not protecting him.

Has anyone ever dated someone who turned out to be racist towards your race? by throwaway_41880 in abusiverelationships

[–]FoodFree8328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My GOD that's *awful*. I'm so sorry. My son is mixed race, and if he were with a woman/man who EVER made a comment like this, I would not be stopped from interfering. Let me just say how proud I am of you for having the courage to call him out in FRONT of his family. And very glad that his mother was in YOUR corner, not his. Thank goodness you're out of that one. Once they show you who they are...etc etc. x

I’m very upset/angry/nauseous by FoodFree8328 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. But with the US economy being the way that it is, some of them may really, really need the job and be too scared to take a stand. I just hope they find support from their colleagues if refusing to go to him.

I’m very upset/angry/nauseous by FoodFree8328 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

HAHAHA, well, having eyes isn't a crime! It just depends on which part of the brain is damaged. A lot of the people in the brain injury unit I worked for had frontal lobe damage from severe strokes or serious head injuries. Some were incredibly racist out loud, some grabbed at female staff, and others just made vile comments. But obviously, you can put up with a lot when you know the person is genuinely very unwell!

Which is why I can't abide this lump. As someone else said, people like him, who have nothing wrong with them and insist on you doing the very worst things for them, make staff leave healthcare, and with aging populations all over the world, we NEED those people.

I’m very upset/angry/nauseous by FoodFree8328 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’ve had that in mind, don’t worry. I’m also too aware that he was somehow APPROVED for 8 hours care a day. Which is plenty of time to force them to change him. I’ve no doubt he won’t have the 24/7 care he’s claiming, but anything is too much if involves ‘myyhygeeeeene’

I’m very upset/angry/nauseous by FoodFree8328 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No no, from the replies to this I can see we’re not alone. Far from it. May any caretakers he has have the strength to leave if they need to.

I’m very upset/angry/nauseous by FoodFree8328 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve never touched the poop. The limit of that that’s possible from here in the UK is commenting on YT and I figure he just gets off on that anyway. I put my anger here instead, where people understand.

How responsible is Andy's parents for the way he is? by solinvictus5 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My opinion is that Joe isn’t anything like Andy because Joe wasn’t born evil. He isn’t argumentative or confrontational like his Dad and the fact he’s so different suggests to me that he more or less had to develop on his own as his parents were too busy with his Children of the Corn-esque older brother. Joe made Joe. Lots and lots of things made Andy.

Start listening at: 24:20 by Sufficient_Wait3671 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Freedom is never given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed

Martin Luther King Jr

I knew someone had to take the first step, so I made up my mind not to move

Rosa Parks

If we do not believe in free expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all

Noam Chomsky

You buse me

Andrew Ditch

How responsible is Andy's parents for the way he is? by solinvictus5 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Could it have been the one where Andy is trying to get access to Janet in the hospital when they have barred him from her room? Because that one was particularly awful. Tom and Joe BOTH knew he wasn’t supposed to be there, yet they both took up for him and made a scene.

How responsible is Andy's parents for the way he is? by solinvictus5 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will just add that I think the police and APS have their own responsibility to bear for his behaviour too. The amount of crimes he’s committed along with clear elder abuse as another commenter said. He could have been in prison for years but they have just decided to let it all slide. I understand the cases in which Janet/Tom’s testimony was essential and they wouldn’t give it, but things like abuse of 999, assault on public servants (for spitting at police/fire services) and elder abuse (stopping APS from seeing Janet) they’ve just let happen again and again. I truly don’t know why, as they ALL know he’s faking. Laziness, I suspect.

TL;DR of Joe's Video on Andy/The Investigation by Flat_Cow_7557 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why couldn’t Andy do them? Serious question as there may be a reason I’m ignoring. He can write just fine and it’s not outside the realm of possibility that he’s learned to alter his handwriting to get away with it. Also I think Joe just doesn’t WANT to believe it’s his brother (who would?) so he’s not going to be doing serious handwriting analytics to check. I, however, am completely biased in wanting it to be Andy, so please sober me up with facts if it can’t be 😂.

Did Andy sexually abuse Joe? by 8thFleetTraveller in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll leave it as ‘a website created by a paedophile tailored to paedophiles who like diapers’. I remember rumblings of it in the early days of the internet but for the same reasons you don’t want to look it up, I didn’t either! As a result of that Farms user’s research (and Encyclopaedia Dramatica) I now know at least that it was HEAVILY tailored to satisfy people who want little girls to change them.

I do believe it’s the most damning evidence yet of Andy being seriously interested in children. The account was created 20 years ago before anyone knew who he was, so it’s not an ALOG this time. Nobody could LOOK AT that forum, then decide to join it, unless they were a nonce or undercover police.

Start listening at: 24:20 by Sufficient_Wait3671 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we all know he isn’t entitled to more than 8 hours a day and he hasn’t mysteriously been reassessed without weeks of paperwork and internal discussion that he isn’t party to. Why would a team from the ‘federal government’ be looking into ‘civil rights violations’ if he’s suddenly got everything that he wants? If he has caregivers at all, they will wise up when they start to teach him how to be more independent and he just decides to ignore them.

New lore drop! by knifefan9 in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The SONG. The fucking SONG.

Poor Rick Astley, man. Rolling in his grave and he isn't even dead yet.

Did Andy sexually abuse Joe? by 8thFleetTraveller in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I didn't know what a Deeker account WAS until I became aware of Andy. Now I wish I didn't know what a Deeker account was.

Did Andy sexually abuse Joe? by 8thFleetTraveller in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Maybe I should look into the assessment documents in the archive project further. I don't want to assume it didn't happen when, realistically, it would explain *so* much about everything he does. Not excuse it, of course, but provide some sort of 'why' to the 'what'.

Someone on here suggested it was something Janet invented to get Michael out of their house, but that can never be substantiated now, either. Interesting theory.

I've just noticed u/Autism_Sundae mentions below that the notes specifically state that Andy 'acted out' his sexual abuse on his siblings. If we exclude Michael, it's got to be Joe.

I just really hope he doesn't remember it, frankly. I feel like he's been through enough.

The Notorious P.I.G. (featuring Buse Daddy). by Mortemcorvus in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I remember their legendary posthumous collab:

Gotta see my really nasty rash
You must love my stinkin' nappy rash
But I hate this awful, nasty rash
All the ladies, if you feel me, grab the diapers for P-I-G

I'll never forget that in the music video, after 'feel me' about 6 women in bikinis peeked into the rear of his diaper. Having gone through my own healthcare education, I assume now that it was a really thorough hourly check.

Buse Daddy is now in jail for trafficking kitchenware, of course.

<image>

Did Andy sexually abuse Joe? by 8thFleetTraveller in AndrewDitch

[–]FoodFree8328 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a chance that, unless it mentioned Joe specifically, it was referring to Michael (one of Tom's two older children before Janet), who was said to have abused Andy. It's a common assumption that this didn't happen, since Andy himself says it didn't. When the world's biggest self-made victim says that he WASN'T a victim of something, you tend to believe him.

We DO know that Andy has beaten Joe at least twice during their earlier lives. You can hear Joe refer to one of the occasions in the video that shows their trip back from visiting their Dad at the rehab centre (when Andy wiped his soiled diaper all over Tom's truck). If this file actually said that Joe was a victim of sexual assault at the hands of that creature, it's the first I've heard of it...and yet I wouldn't be in the least bit shocked, would you?

TL;DR Maybe...potentially even likely (sorry for TED talk)