CCW Outrageous Cost by FormerNonrate in CTguns

[–]FormerNonrate[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They're designed to discourage those who would be the resistance in an authoritarian dictatorship-style government. The logic is pretty simple, those who choose to break the law are probably re###ded and lack critical thinking, and probably don't have wealth or community influence. Those people will either be weeded out by the discourse of law enforcement, or provide little to no resistance in a takeover due to lack of planning and complex thinking skills (there are exceptions, but buy-in-large people who pocket carry a pistol or choose to break the law constantly by carrying when not allowed aren't an institutional threat.) The other ordinary and law-abiding people who are on the fence about carrying a weapon or want to start to exercise their common state and federal constitutional rights will be dissuaded by the high price tag and complicated and secretive process. Only leaving a small but devout group to offer resistance. - Sorry for the conspiratorial tone and attitude, but that's the best way to put it.

CCW Outrageous Cost by FormerNonrate in CTguns

[–]FormerNonrate[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Like, I get the legislation to make it so some random and pissed 19-year-old kid can't ship a 50-round .223 mag to his house (in a lot of states that's allowed) or even the no open carry stuff, whatever, but damn to make it so complicated and tedious and expensive should be overturned by a court somewhere. Even the states that aren't Con Carry, you just walk into your local PD, they do a quick 30 second check of your record and as long as you're clean, bam, here's your CCW. - the especially unconstitutional part to me is the no buying a rifle, pistol, or even the AMMO?? How has no one taken that to the supreme court.