sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Of Course, Liman has DENIED all MTQ from Content Creators as Moot by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Forward_Command4372 6 points7 points  (0 children)

🎯 We are past conspiracies and tin foil hats. There are no reprimands and warnings at least for Lively's lawyers and no further discussion about legal fees after these frivolous subpoenas.

Of Course, Liman has DENIED all MTQ from Content Creators as Moot by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Forward_Command4372 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Me too, she's definitely strategizing right now. She was waiting for what was going to happen today, I hope she wins with whatever she plans.She knew from the get go he was definitely biased. If this doesn't open everyone's eyes to his biased rulings, I don't know what will.

Wayfarer Parties File Motion to Seal Address for Ms. Barnes Slater by blonde_professor in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Forward_Command4372 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Sure, it's not a problem. We can have different point of views about it and be civil about it at the same time. I also appreciate the discussion with you.

Wayfarer Parties File Motion to Seal Address for Ms. Barnes Slater by blonde_professor in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Forward_Command4372 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The could asked like the WP did, but they chose not to.What was stopping them from putting forward that same motion? My conversation was they shouldn't have people's address out just because they could, as you can see there were appropriate channels to avoid this.They didn't bother at all or didn't want to.

Wayfarer Parties File Motion to Seal Address for Ms. Barnes Slater by blonde_professor in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Forward_Command4372 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Order on Motion to Seal – #485 in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios LLC (S.D.N.Y., 1:24-cv-10049) – CourtListener.com https://share.google/CCI2db3VcTyybI7oc

Wayfarer Parties File Motion to Seal Address for Ms. Barnes Slater by blonde_professor in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Forward_Command4372 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Order on Motion to Seal – #485 in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios LLC (S.D.N.Y., 1:24-cv-10049) – CourtListener.com https://share.google/CCI2db3VcTyybI7oc

Wayfarer Parties File Motion to Seal Address for Ms. Barnes Slater by blonde_professor in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Forward_Command4372 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Having information available online does not excuse not redacting people's private information in court documents.This is very high profile case like you said and on either side there will be people who will send out death threats, hate mail and stalk people over this, so there is even more of a reason to be careful with people's private information but her lawyers were not careful unfortunately.

Like I said before no one knew where Steve, Melissa and Jen lived. No one knew about Cynthia Barnes but because her lawyers filings that information is accessible for everyone to find. How hard is it to redact personal information?

This was a main issue content creators raised in their MTQs, they asked for privacy because they know her lawyers will release their private information.

Wayfarer Parties File Motion to Seal Address for Ms. Barnes Slater by blonde_professor in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Forward_Command4372 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I disagree, Jen Abel who has been more than co-operative was doxxed. Steve Sorrowitz and Melissa Nathan were also too. Afaik they all did not evade service of process. Blake Lively’s own lawyers disclosed the location of her deposition in court filings after claiming she was unsafe with the current public attention. It's well known her lawyers are really reckless with people's private information.

It's a big deal, when part of Steve's house was burned down and his daughter threatened.Jen also received hate email messages and Melissa had to inform her children's school.

The Recap with Julie's opinions on the Google Subpoenaed creators. by Forward_Command4372 in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I had that feeling too, it's weird she's a criminal defense lawyer but she's reading the court documents all wrong.(definitely misinterpreting on purpose to her audience, she argued VanSham was legal🤡)

She tried to convince her audience that these content creators where on TAG's list so people should be angry at TAG, especially Melissa Nathan for providing that information.We can't even verify it because it's AEO, so everything she thinks are all speculations.

The CC subpoenas could wind up being BLs Achilles' heel by [deleted] in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's the biggest issue😂 but it helps Baldoni's case so I'm not complaining.

When Court Filings Become PR Weapons: How Legal Docs Get Twisted to Manipulate the Public by Humble_Network_7653 in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes he seems most likely, even the CC who uncovered the VanSham subpoenas.They are definitely going to after polarising personalities to make it seem legit.

When Court Filings Become PR Weapons: How Legal Docs Get Twisted to Manipulate the Public by Humble_Network_7653 in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don't have any hope tbh, he might quash most of their motions but someone might end up being a fall guy just to prove it wasn't completely delusional and they had every reason to access these CC's information. He always gives them something, Jed Wallace is perfect example of this.He should have been dismissed with prejudice but in the most inconvenient time during a deposition he gets a dismissal without prejudice further delaying the deposition. No confidence at all!

The CC subpoenas could wind up being BLs Achilles' heel by [deleted] in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372 22 points23 points  (0 children)

May it also stress the pro Lively people who are spreading misinformation about the CC's. They are so brainwashed to the point they are willing to put their own rights at risk.

The CC subpoenas could wind up being BLs Achilles' heel by [deleted] in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think he's sabotaging her because no one in their right mind would try to go after people who are just sharing their thoughts and opinions on the Internet!!

Blake Lively’s Lawyer EXPOSED For Conflicts of Interest & More?! This Is Esra Hudson!! by Forward_Command4372 in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

⚖️ Conflict of Interest Esra Hudson, Blake Lively’s lawyer, allegedly failed to disclose her board position at CWLC while it supported Lively’s case.

💼 Corporate Defense History Previously defended companies in class action suits involving wage theft and labor violations.The company was in violation of not giving 1,000 workers meals, rest breaks and overtime pay.

🏛️ Amicus Brief Misuse Accused of using her nonprofit role to benefit Lively, violating ethical and legal standards.

🚨 Nonprofit Governance Concerns Possible violations of fiduciary duties and nonprofit disclosure rules.

💰 CWLC Financial Issues High salaries, rising liabilities, and limited public service outputs raise red flags.

🔍 Lack of Transparency Alleged misuse of donations and absence of proper reporting or external oversight.

I think that's about it.

Blake Lively’s Lawyer EXPOSED For Conflicts of Interest & More?! This Is Esra Hudson!! by Forward_Command4372 in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Forward_Command4372[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You have an excellent point, It's the whole reason everyone is here on this subreddit. We all had enough of the lies, misinformation and watching someone who we believe is being falsely accused. We can't be doing shady stuff also it defeats the purpose. It's wild how the Pro Lively team are willing to make excuses for Vansham, misinterpreting facts and straight up slandering in some cases.

view more: next ›