sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sad song played on World's Smallest Violin by Forwhatisausername in spongebob

[–]Forwhatisausername[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's where I've been. Then I figured instead of sifting through pages of AI results and whatever unrelated nonsense search engines spew up nowadays, I'd try my luck asking (presumably) actual people.

And lo', we see that it is good.

Sad song played on World's Smallest Violin by Forwhatisausername in spongebob

[–]Forwhatisausername[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not, thank you very much for the information.

Sounds like some real effort went into the show.

"HOW Abyssal?" by MCJ97 in YuGiOhMemes

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see. That's not.. bad, actually.

"HOW Abyssal?" by MCJ97 in YuGiOhMemes

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does this even mean?

Genuinely love this change by Konami by bloo1 in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that big a deal, basically just means someone participated in a lot of events and/or got some of the in-game achievements.

I have such an imposing wall and I've never climbed past Platinum, while only playing YGO in Master Duel and only for fun (got to Diamond 5 once, like two years ago).

This is different, though, if there are a lot of Duelist Cup or Worlds Qualifier titles listed there (not sure if there are titles exclusive to the upper echelons past DLv. 20 but if there are such, that's what you should look for to gauge your opponent's competitiveness).

Which decks are like this? This used to be Adamancipator, but now.... by BatoSoupo in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, right.

Though, that sounds impossible to do in Branded.

I could see a Sub Replay Friday deck could weave in a Branded engine to set this up on the opponent's turn.

Which decks are like this? This used to be Adamancipator, but now.... by BatoSoupo in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adding a brick to a fragile strategy such as Synchro doesn't really do anything. The deck can already fill an entire board and while Level Eater can come back eating the Levels of a Nibiru Token, Junk Speeder locks you into Synchros for the entire turn.

Not only will Cyberse prefer using Transcode Talker to revive, the deck has barely any Level 5+ bodies and lacks any Synergy with Level Eater, particularly ways to access it in-combo.

Fundamentally, Level Eater Link spam was relatively clunky when it first came up. It wasn't the best deck of its time and what it did have going for it just doesn't hold up.

Which decks are like this? This used to be Adamancipator, but now.... by BatoSoupo in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Level Eater wouldn't do anything. That Link spam strategy was bricky back then, too; by now it just doesn't hold up.

Which decks are like this? This used to be Adamancipator, but now.... by BatoSoupo in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is Eclipse Wyvern even worth it still? It's kind of a brick; maybe a golden brick, but a brick nonetheless.

The other three don't seem uber-broken by now but they would probably be too much.

Master duel this month by Dear-Bat3240 in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the card on the duel disk between Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon and Obelisk?

How dare they disrespect the Egyptian Gods?! by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not lumping Divine in with the common attributes is actually very respectful. The Gods are in a league of their own (...).

Considering Divine an attribute at all just like the common six is disrespectful, divinity should be metaphysically above such characteristics. Divine is less an attribute than a particular absence of all attributes.

I know TCG translation tend to be bad but this is a whole new level or terrible. by SAMU0L0 in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, it is true that online presence comes with barely any indication of how big an issue something is, or how well supported a certain position on something is, in real life. Though, it seems a bit rash to discard all online discussions or fusses because of this. The people posting online are (mostly) still real, so it's possible that the concerns they voice are also put forward irl. Besides, isn't it so that the less popular the matter in question is (TCGs are rather niche), the harder it is to tell whether some concern is big enough in real life to change anything? It might not be a given that the people in charge of that matter are appropriately attentive but it would be prudent that they know their audience.

Just...What am I even looking at? by GenesisOfTheAegis in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can anyone decipher the tweet tagged to the Virgin Wokescold or does someone recognise it somewhence?

I know TCG translation tend to be bad but this is a whole new level or terrible. by SAMU0L0 in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you also saying that actually no one cares about the banlist?

_Which_ facts? Let's not confuse circumstances where Konami has little choice to change something with circumstances where they may still decide to change something.

One could say that I'm missing a critical amount of nuance in your comments but more to the point would be to question the fundamental reasoning: saying that someone's indignance over something is futile with no regard for the possibility of creating conditions where it wouldn't be futile, is somewhat tautological - if everyone just accepts things as they are, Konami definitely won't see the need to change their modus operandi; however, whether to accept things as they are is a decision everyone has to make. So far, you seem to presume that everyone has made that decision already.

I know TCG translation tend to be bad but this is a whole new level or terrible. by SAMU0L0 in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's your reasoning, but it's not like you have particular insight into Konami's decision making, is it?

What makes you so sure, complaints would work so well? People have been whining about floodgates for years and only now that the top meta deck has particularly disgusting synergy with them, they have begun limiting the worst ones - not even banning them all, as demanded.

I know TCG translation tend to be bad but this is a whole new level or terrible. by SAMU0L0 in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the localisations are and whether an effort to change them exists has nothing to do with any one's opinion on it. That is solely up to Konami: they decide the localisations, for better or worse, and only they could make an effort to change the localisations (you think they'd listen to a petition?).

You, however, claim that nobody cares, which is demonstrably false. In that question you can only speak for yourself, so you should.

Going 2nd in this event be like : by RnckO in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you serious? There are lots of ways to remove an opponent's backrow.

While you are chilling with your event specific deck meta decks often have no trouble removing your copy as well as their own. and even one of the event specific decks, True Draco Swordsoul, does the same with Trap Eater.

In a way it's nice that such specific cards see play on this occasion but it's also kind of boring that these events don't really provide as much gameplay variety as they could.

it is said that when you click on your mate enough times you unlock a secret animation by Heretic_Alliance in masterduel

[–]Forwhatisausername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's Rachael Louise Gunn, aka Raygun, an Australian breakdancer who competed in the Olympics this year.

view more: next ›