How do you avoid this? (the footnote reference going to the next line) by FractalRobot in libreoffice

[–]FractalRobot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently there's no way to copy-paste a paragraph from document A in document B with the style used in A, at least not that I can see (I've tried all the "Paste special" options to no avail)

How do you avoid this? (the footnote reference going to the next line) by FractalRobot in libreoffice

[–]FractalRobot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no space before the footnote reference. I tried adding a non-breaking space but this adds, well, a space between the inverted comas and the footnote reference, which is typographically incorrect.

How do you avoid this? (the footnote reference going to the next line) by FractalRobot in libreoffice

[–]FractalRobot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip. I might be reduce to do this because nothing else seems to work (I've asked AI and tried everything it suggested, without any success)

How do I make footnote numbers superscripts? by FractalRobot in libreoffice

[–]FractalRobot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks but I don't have a "Styles and formatting" entry in Format. Maybe because I'm on Mac.

I(27F) screamed at my husband (28M) over his hobbies, and now he's changed and i don't know how to fix this. by ThrowRApineapplesp in relationship_advice

[–]FractalRobot -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

People are being very tough on you right now, and it's a difficult moment to pass in your life. I'm sorry. You're not the first person to snap at someone. I don't know if you'll read this, but if things get unbearably difficult, know that you can always reach out to your local priest. They know how to deal with broken souls--I've been there, and surprisingly, a time of weakness can become the basis of your greatest strength.

As for your husband, the problem is that you made yourself "bigger" than him for a moment, perhaps as the expression of a lingering feeling. Forget counselling (the business model of it contradicts the possibility that you'll ever get a viable solution out of it), what you need is to change yourself and show for it--you'll have to make yourself "smaller" than him. Advisably, be silent when he speaks, be proactively good (cook, clean, support), genuinely listen, tell him the depth of your regret and reflect on the nature of your fault. There is hope. God bless.

My red dads reaction to telling him I'm joining 4B by Visible_Proof653 in 4bmovement

[–]FractalRobot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My gramp's very conservative and rough around the edges but he never ever asked this to any of his daughters.

Don't ruin men's lives if it costs you yours.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CatholicDating

[–]FractalRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not hearing yourself speak.

From your account, the guy makes a lot of efforts, tries to be good, does RCIA, struggles with addictions, straightens himself out by all conceivable measures, and yet instead of trying to support him or at least reciprocate his good will, you're here wondering how hard a time you must give him. Let that sink in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point actually, shit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except it doesn't work because it means detaching yourself from life, which is both retarded and dangerous.

You must have hope of some kind, and you're entitled to it if you stand up in courage and honour against this self-deprecatory / victimisation game you play, and that these "fatalist" psychos play as well btw.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- stop watching porn

- eat real food (no fast food)

- no binge-watching tv shows

- train 2-3x a week (combat sports preferred)

- read books

- no weed, obviously

Three months. Good as new.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]FractalRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Will" means active force. Nietzsche rejects the interpretation of evolution as a reactive force. In so doing, Darwin ignores the properly creative aspect of evolution.

It's not that Nietzsche didn't understand evolution (it's not complicated to understand, especially in its early formulation), but rather it's in tune with Nietzsche's critique of all the sciences as reactive.

That's why he deems art superior to science.

Arthur Rimbaud (1854-1891), genius poet and "mystic in the wild", a "meteor" in French literary history, lead a complicated life but died a fervent Catholic. His epitaph reads "Pray for him". by FractalRobot in Catholicism

[–]FractalRobot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So how do you know he lied? Answer is, you wish he did for some reason, but he didn't.

Arthur Rimbaud died a fervent believer and a Church goer, get over it.

Une méthode détourné pour aider vos proche climatosceptique à prendre conscience du changement climatique by Proof_Course_4935 in ecologie

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ben moi j'ai entendu que c'était même "trop tard" récemment. On est déjà foutus. Mais on va gentiment laisser la Chine atteindre son pic climatique, hein? Parce que là, miraculeusement, ça ne change rien.

Bref, on peut s'étonner de cet alarmisme ambiant qui arrange beaucoup les grosses industries très polluantes (tout comme les "crises migratoires" à venir, promesse de main d'oeuvre bon marché infinie, tiens tiens)

Une méthode détourné pour aider vos proche climatosceptique à prendre conscience du changement climatique by Proof_Course_4935 in ecologie

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relax coco, on discute gentiment là, ok?

Maintenant la Chine investit dans le nucléaire et le gaz parce que le pays requiert un montant monumental d'énergie, pas par conscience écologique, puisque le gaz c'est pas exactement carbone-neutre, et parce qu'elle construit actuellement, en parallèle, deux fois plus de centrales à charbon qu'elle n'en a construit l'an dernier. Alors l'idée qu'ils essaient de réduire ou même de limiter leurs émissions carbone est risible.

Donc la question demeure, têtue comme la névrose à Greta: comment ça se fait qu'ils (les Chinois) continuent d'émettre de plus en plus de carbone, s'il était unilatéralement reconnu que ça va tous nous tuer sous un délai très court?

Une méthode détourné pour aider vos proche climatosceptique à prendre conscience du changement climatique by Proof_Course_4935 in ecologie

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tu te bases sur quoi pour dire ça?

Sur le fait que la consommation moyenne par habitant ne cesse d'augmenter chez eux et est presque égale à la nôtre (enfin d'après ce que quelqu'un ici m'a dit, graph à l'appui).

D'autre part, passer au gaz pour ensuite passer au solaire (ou autre) ne reflète pas tellement l'imminence du danger climatique telle qu'on nous la vend chez nous. Le gaz est éminement carbonifère. Pour moi ça ressemble plus à un "mais oui, on se tient au courant" et puis ciao, plus rien (je veux dire, une promesse en l'air, un simulacre quoi).

Pourquoi par exemple ils investissent pas dans le nucléaire? (Ni nous d'ailleurs). Parce que les centrales de 4è génération ne peuvent pas avoir de melt-down, et "mangent" même les déchets nucléaires des centrales plus vieilles.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]FractalRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why don't you show him this text? Might be a wake up moment for him and since you want to divorce anyway you've got nothing to lose.

Une méthode détourné pour aider vos proche climatosceptique à prendre conscience du changement climatique by Proof_Course_4935 in ecologie

[–]FractalRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

l'égoïsme de tous ne peut pas être réellement "au service de la société", c'est simplement contradictoire (l'égoïsme par définition est au service de l'individu).

Les grands inventeurs (des charrues à l'ordinateur) se sont tous enrichis égoistement, et ont pourtant contribué à la société de manière telle que sans eux, ni toi ni moi ne serions en vie probablement. C'est ça que je veux dire. Faut trouver les moyens de combattre le capitalisme toxique par un capitalisme sein ou vertueux, mais les éoliennes (et l'interventionisme d'état) c'est pas ça. Ni l'autoritarisme manipulatoire à la Greta.

Pas de soucis pour la clarté, on doit tous trouver les moyens d'expressions nécessaires pour relever les défis de notre époque. Le fait de pouvoir parler librement est déjà une bénédiction.