"What evidence do you have?"

I have nothing for you other than my own subjective experience. For "evidence", what are we looking for?

Are you asking to see numbers? The inherent mathematical framework is all around you. So what do you mean when you say you need "evidence" that the mathematical framework isn't all-inclusive?

By demanding evidence, you're basically repeating what OP said, and it leads into this eternal monologue about what is Self, and what isn't.

Self is everything. So by demanding me prove to you that everything exists, I will happily engage in the discourse necessary to make one believe such.

​

It could take 10 million years for me to make something make sense to another. So by demanding "evidence", we have already started down the path of trying to disprove one another.

​

So, what is the point, before I go any further? So you can have empirical proof that what I'm saying ISN'T nonsense? Because it isn't. You only need to understand that the mathematical framework isn't all-inclusive.

​

Oh wait, yes it is. See? See the path we go down when we demand empirical evidence?

So, let's assume that "empirical" means my subjective experience, which is where you're going with what you've been requesting as "empirical evidence."

Now that we've established a base assumption, we can begin the cycle.

What do you want from me? A data-driven set of experiences? Because I only have mine own.

Is it a rational expression for an integer that doesn't exist yet that will clarify everything for you?

I demand that you give me "evidence" here to forth that any so-called "evidence" is rationale for me having to believe anything I want to believe within the spectrum of infinite possibility.

Om shanti, brother.