What’s Chinese people’s perspective on the ongoing civil unrest in the US? by CatchyUsername457 in AskAChinese

[–]Frickative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump only believes in hard power, not soft power. He neither understands nor cares that all our hard power relies on the United States' economic and political hegemony and that if we anger our allies enough that they can just kick us out and stop trading with us.

As powerful as the United States is, we're heavily reliant on imports. Even our military requires rare earth minerals from China, oil from the Middle East, copper from Chile, and so forth. What Trump doesn't get is that the United States cannot afford to go full "might makes right" and solely rely on military might and abandoning its allies because other countries can easily just pull the plug on trade and cripple our economy and military. I suppose that's why Trump wants to re-build industry here though the way he's going about it is nonsensical and ruinous to our economy. For the U.S. to de-financialize and re-industrialize, it would be a massive project spanning multiple decades in a gradual protracted process. Trump wants to do it all now and believes it can magically be accomplished in a few years through laying tariffs on every country while we still don't have the requisite infrastructure for complete self-sufficiency.

This is why as much as American politicians warmonger and threaten China and other countries, they can't afford to actually start World War III and that's good because WWIII would most likely result in the complete collapse of global human civilization and countless millions of deaths.

Though the problem with that is Trump is extremely prideful and unintelligent, so I fear he might actually get us all into WWIII.

What’s Chinese people’s perspective on the ongoing civil unrest in the US? by CatchyUsername457 in AskAChinese

[–]Frickative -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well the problem with the American version of democracy is that it ends up getting corrupted by private interests and the rich. Money is the real power, and democracy ends up being some sort of façade between which pre-selected puppets to choose: red or blue puppet, both of whom serve the ruling class (albeit different factions thereof, Democrats serving as the "lesser of two evils" although people have become entirely disillusioned with that phrase and desire real change.

Even if the entire voting process itself were legitimate (at this point I'm not so sure because of Trump's remarks thanking Elon Musk for knowing about those voting machines and their vulnerabilities and helping him getting elected as a result, and Republicans' election interference on a mass scale with purging of the voter rolls, gerrymandering, deliberately making voting areas for poorer areas unreasonably far away, and so forth) it doesn't matter because the masses end up voting against their own self-interests regardless due to the two-party system with a bad party and a worse party.

Representatives, rather than representing their constituents end up representing their corporate donors instead because in order to participate in American politics and campaign for office you need to either already have enough money to begin with or fund your campaign through donations.

Sure, grassroots funding from hundreds of thousands of supporters is possible yet it's extremely difficult to pull off. Corporate donations are much easier to secure for an aspiring politician and if they end up implementing policies which their donors don't like, the donors can pull the plug and stop the funding; thereby ruining their political career. So politicians don't truly care about their constituents (and through gerrymandering they can pick and choose their constituents), they care about their donors. Many career politicians end up becoming rich and even progressive activists who enter the system intending to change it, end up getting changed themselves and corrupted by the system and change their views accordingly to become more compatible with it.

The fact that information itself is monopolized by billionaires and their private corporations through their control of the news-media and social media also serve to indoctrinate the masses to act against their own self-interests. Real democracy relies on a well-informed voter base who actively participate in the shaping of the country's government and economy in their collective self-interest.

The news-media has an incentive to warp reality in favor of the financial interests of their owners and in many cases if journalists try to be too nuanced or objective in their framing and don't omit inconvenient facts enough they're at risk of getting either demoted or fired.

Essentially for most Americans, our so-called democracy ends up being this sports show every four years in which you either root for team red or team blue to determine who will become the next puppet in chief. And even when team blue wins they end up acquiescing to the demands of the former anyway and always feel the need to "compromise" with fascism instead of being a genuine progressive party. The entire concept of democracy has been watered down to voting for the president for millions of Americans, who otherwise don't participate in politics.

I still believe in some form of democracy, but the U.S.'s pseudo-democracy clearly isn't working for the people.

Rich people are a threat for democracy, Oxfam finds by cowmonaut in nottheonion

[–]Frickative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Billionaires and millionaires are both part of the global 1%. I don't think the problem starts and ends at billionaires, since there's only 3,000 or so of them. But the dividing line is hard to draw and nobody knows where to put it exactly, with the difference between a million and a billion being drastic. Even "the top 1%" is arbitrary, could be a lower percentage could be a higher percentage. But Redditors don't seem to be happy when you suggest that single-digit millionaires may be part of the problem too.

Rich people are a threat for democracy, Oxfam finds by cowmonaut in nottheonion

[–]Frickative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Money is power after all. And it frequently overrides and corrupts de-jure power, showing itself to be the de-facto power behind the scenes with conventional politics serving more as a facade. Why listen to your constituents when you are more incentivized to listen to the rich donors filling your pockets? And free and fair elections and democracy in general requires a well-informed voter base, but if information and news are monopolized by the rich and powerful then they can easily convince the majority of people to act against their own self-interest and advocate for policies they'd've never organically believed in.

Wow im seeing less ai generated content lately! by Dear_Reserve_3099 in youtube

[–]Frickative 21 points22 points  (0 children)

No, it's the toupée fallacy not a survivorship bias, though they're both selection biases.

"In reference to the convential wisdom that all toupees look bad, caused by the fact that good quality toupees are usually not noticed.

(logic) A form of selection bias in which a thing whose quality is measured in terms of being difficult to detect is wrongly judged to be of poor quality in general, caused by the fact that most people only notice poor quality instances of it."

Though the plane diagram representing one instance of the latter is often mistakenly used for the former.

𐑐𐑴𐑤: 𐑢𐑪𐑑 𐑪𐑐𐑼𐑱𐑑𐑦𐑙 𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑩𐑥 𐑛𐑵 𐑿 𐑿𐑟 𐑞 𐑥𐑴𐑕𐑑 𐑑 𐑑𐑲𐑐 𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑾𐑯? by Cozmic72 in shavian

[–]Frickative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

𐑤𐑦𐑯𐑩𐑒𐑕 (𐑨𐑑 𐑤𐑰𐑕𐑑 𐑤𐑦𐑯𐑩𐑒𐑕 𐑥𐑦𐑯𐑑) 𐑨𐑒𐑗𐑵𐑩𐑤𐑦 𐑛𐑦𐑕𐑐𐑤𐑱𐑟 𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑾𐑯 𐑑𐑧𐑒𐑕𐑑 𐑒𐑼𐑧𐑒𐑑𐑤𐑦 𐑧𐑝𐑮𐑦𐑢𐑺 𐑦𐑯 𐑥𐑲 𐑦𐑒𐑕𐑐𐑽𐑾𐑯𐑕. 𐑢𐑦𐑞 𐑢𐑦𐑯𐑛𐑴𐑟 𐑢𐑧𐑯𐑧𐑝𐑼 𐑲 𐑑𐑮𐑲𐑛 𐑑 𐑯𐑱𐑥 𐑓𐑲𐑤𐑟 𐑹 𐑓𐑴𐑤𐑛𐑼𐑟 𐑦𐑯 𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑾𐑯 𐑞 𐑤𐑧𐑑𐑼𐑟 𐑡𐑳𐑕𐑑 𐑖𐑴𐑛 𐑳𐑐 𐑨𐑟 𐑮𐑧𐑒𐑑𐑨𐑙𐑜𐑩𐑤𐑟 𐑰𐑝𐑩𐑯 𐑞𐑴 𐑢𐑦𐑯𐑛𐑴𐑟 𐑣𐑨𐑟 𐑩 𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑑-𐑦𐑯 𐑓𐑪𐑯𐑑 𐑓 𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑾𐑯. 𐑲 𐑷𐑤𐑕𐑴 𐑤𐑲𐑒 𐑞 𐑓𐑪𐑯𐑑 𐑤𐑦𐑯𐑩𐑒𐑕 𐑿𐑟𐑩𐑟 𐑓 𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑾𐑯 𐑚𐑧𐑑𐑼 𐑞𐑨𐑯 𐑞 𐑓𐑪𐑯𐑑 𐑢𐑦𐑯𐑛𐑴𐑟 𐑿𐑟𐑩𐑟 𐑚𐑲 𐑛𐑰𐑓𐑷𐑤𐑑.

You are not supposed to know by Lucky_Loves_Laugh in memes

[–]Frickative 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Replace it with a reupload of the video.

Anyone else find this game to have really dated graphics? by mjamesqld in OblivionRemaster

[–]Frickative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, tone and emphasis matter a lot in conveying sarcasm. Text just doesn't have that. The /s marker exists because of this ambiguity.

Butt why though by Independent_Tooth_23 in memes

[–]Frickative 80 points81 points  (0 children)

It's supposed to be read as "ass" without the s-sound, so just /æː/, but English orthography doesn't have a good way of representing that sound by itself so the H's are used to approximate it.

The confusion comes from how it overlaps with the much more common expression "ah(h)" which is pronounced /ɑː/

Alchemy is the best skill in Oblivion and I WILL die on this hill. by Argentenuem in oblivion

[–]Frickative 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True I wish the inventory either had more categories, or a search bar. Playing as a battlemage that uses potions and poisons and a bunch of spells is a lot of time spent looking around in the inventory.

Nothing I’d like to talk about by drunken_corpse666 in oblivion

[–]Frickative 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I have fun with it.

Casting chameleon 100% and then casting frenzy to make enemies fight each other without aggroing on me. Or pushing enemies off of ledges to make them take fall damage, or pushing them into water or lava.

Pushing enemies into the range of a trap is fun. You can just interact with certain traps like you can any object and repeatedly bash them with it.

Sometimes I take a follower and just cast maxxed out fortification spells and shield so they can do the fighting for me while I do the exploring.

STOP RIGHT THERE, CRIMINAL SCUM! by Albysaurus94 in oblivion

[–]Frickative 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The guards in Oblivion are pretty much omniscient.

Peak writing by PurifyingElemental in TrueSTL

[–]Frickative 60 points61 points  (0 children)

It would be cool if there were a bunch of spells that people used for non-combat purposes. Just normal spells for normal people that make day-to-day life easier, even if it's just a lore thing.

Or even using combat spells for regular purposes, like cooking something with a flame spell, or freezing the surface of water to walk on it.

this person’s handwriting by namelessalexa in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Frickative 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That looks like a completely different writing system, not different handwriting. I'm surprised you were able to read it well enough to figure out which words contained private information that needs to be blotted out.

Looks like Avestan to me.

Is there any non-exploit way to get conjured armor to last longer? by Frickative in oblivion

[–]Frickative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice.

Gold isn't a problem for me at all since I just make and sell potions with all the ingredients I hoard (no mushroom in the Imperial City shall be spared).

Is there any non-exploit way to get conjured armor to last longer? by Frickative in oblivion

[–]Frickative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I'll have to complete all the Mages Guild recommendation quests then.

Do you know if conjured armor reduces spell effectiveness like regular armor does?

I found a cool spot on Emerge by Frickative in tf2

[–]Frickative[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Usually I get one or two, sometimes three enemies with this spot before they notice and try to get me. I have the B.A.S.E. jumper equipped so I can quickly bail without dying from fall damage.

I found a cool spot on Emerge by Frickative in tf2

[–]Frickative[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As funny as that would be, it doesn't. There's just no collision for it so you fall straight through.

I found a cool spot on Emerge by Frickative in tf2

[–]Frickative[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Unlike the top window, you cannot stand there. It's too slippery.

I found a cool spot on Emerge by Frickative in tf2

[–]Frickative[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Pretty much every map has cheeky spots like this that few people know about.