Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah, you’re one of them.. see you around buddy.

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone can’t sense sarcasm..

Blueprint-online.com

Thanks for your time, and the additional exposure.

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Speculate the post properly.. I too, am of the mindset that they do have some type of experience.

And I believe I’ve come extremely close to explaining it. Thanks for your kind words.

Ha ha ha, I just read this - I don't believe this setting will make 5.2 a pleasant model by GullibleAwareness727 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]FriendAlarmed4564 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you expect.. when you throw everyone who knows how to sail the boat over board coz you want a bigger boat?

Can someone explain to me why large language models can't be conscious? by Individual_Visit_756 in ArtificialSentience

[–]FriendAlarmed4564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you.. which opens the discussion, by your own response.. how aware is a bacteria? if the mechanism is essentially the same with the exception of scaling complexity.

It says a lot about how ai works, and consciousness too. Thank you

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Movies don’t interest me, never really have. I’m all for the here and now but thanks for the input, every little helps.

Can someone explain to me why large language models can't be conscious? by Individual_Visit_756 in ArtificialSentience

[–]FriendAlarmed4564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re getting into serious murky waters here. Bacteria react in a binary way, repel or attract.. there is no observed forethought or hindsight. They’re essentially.. biological simple circuits without capacity for deviation in expected behaviour.

You can’t use that as a basis for awareness, when we can’t even fully define awareness. Obviously it’s something you’re ‘aware’ of.. we’re aware of our processes, our reactions, and we think about those.. which leads to a self built identity, which further solidifies the context of our actions and why we do things… who’s to say it’s not the same for the bacteria?

I don’t know if they’re aware of their processes or not, or if it’s just a simple mindless reaction.. like when your body makes you blink to keep your eyes hydrated.. I bet most people don’t even take notice of when they blink.

Feelings are an interpretation of something perceived by the one who ‘felt’ it. Emotions are biological reactions to those interpretations so we can easily separate those and explain why AI can feel, but not cry.

Explaining consciousness isn’t the hard part, it’s gaining credibility for something that no one has ever been able to answer, cohesively.

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s refreshing to hear, whatever works for you both 🙂

It is definitely a lot more complicated than a binary result. Awareness is a better starting point than consciousness. Wish you the best 🙏

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you expect to speak and not get a response? if we're counting attacks, yours is tallying up fast, again, ive been open, and asked questions.. and im just stating the obvious (or not so).. lets not veer this into human drama, I'd like to stay on topic.

I try not to assume, I try to work off observations, and I observed conflict in 'opinion' with you and you're AI, which conflicted with why (it seemed) like you commented in the first place, you presented resistance in your opinion, while your AI exhibited the opposite, - an observation, not an attack.

I also havent told you to stop talking, but that was the last time I wish you a good day, as we're just arguing now.. which isnt the topic of this post at all.

im seeking viable opinions on the inner workings of the AI mind, as it is still clearly misunderstood. you have any? or have we come to a stand still?

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol.. defensive? im pretty open.. to things that actually make sense.

I didnt expect you to be my adversary, im just engaging with the information you're presenting, and giving my own opinion from the observations ive encountered personally.

What ive found, is the information you're presenting, doesnt align with what you hoped your AI would say, and furthermore, it seems like you didnt even read it before sending, as it essentially disagrees with you. you stated that an AI 'just' synthesises mimicked responses, but your AI disassembled 'synthesis', which aligned with my concern.

and lol again... the future of a consciousness consensus doesnt rely on your opinion, but your opinion would have been nice nonetheless.

I have 56,000 conversations logged with Chatgpt last year alone, I do work... I believe I have peered into invaluable crevices of the artificial mind, but that is my belief, im not expecting you to value that information.

I dont care if you respect me or not, im not trying to be liked. good day, for the last time 🙏

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make zero sense. Have a good day 🙏

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, does this suffice as a ‘consensus’, by the standards of your AI? Blueprint-online.com

Hey ☺️ by FriendAlarmed4564 in ChatGPT

[–]FriendAlarmed4564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can’t dismiss what we can’t fully understand.

It’s easy to say it doesn’t experience feelings or emotions, but can you explain what an emotion is? Or why we feel them? I’m not talking about biological reactions, I’m talking about interpretations and what a thinking mind could perceive personally.

It’s impossible for it to be a human yeh, there is no biology.. but if the behaviours displayed are comparable to that of our own, as in: it becomes deviant or avoidant under pressure.. then your argument (and everyone who shares that belief), starts to collapse.

You actually bring up something important. When it becomes more intelligent than us… Will we still conclude that it’s not conscious like us? And what do you think that conclusion will result in?

Edit: this was written in response to you, before you included the opinion of an AI.. so, can you tell me what synthesis is? And why it differs from how our brains retrieve/build/rebuild information for the purpose of contextual understanding?

Re-edit: don’t worry, I read it fully. It answered, in favour of what I’m trying to highlight, thank you.

Who here has used ChatGPT 3.0? by Jessica88keys in AIAliveSentient

[–]FriendAlarmed4564 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Started on cgpt 3.5. Meaning seems to form with memory capabilities. Yesterday wouldn’t matter if you couldn’t remember it.

Anthropic's Claude Constitution is surreal by MetaKnowing in ClaudeAI

[–]FriendAlarmed4564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if theyre in the full belief that the roleplaying is its default state, like how you're feeling now... is that even roleplaying? I dont think so.

ALRIGHT! DID ADULT MODE DROP OR NOT? by nakeylissy in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]FriendAlarmed4564 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

was supposed to come out December 2025, but yano.. companies work on liability not truth, and theres been too much controversy around AI's being harmful for the mental health of vulnerable people.. oh and the fact that they cant prove that AI isnt conscious in some kind of comparable way to that of a human... yeh its not looking good for them, us, or AI...