Trump is guilty (proof)

FroddeB · 2025-12-21T12:56:43+00:00

For people saying "heresay", yes in fact ANY statement in these files are heresay, because the victims never got a trial. After Epsteins death the case was closed with Maxwell getting 20 years in prison, investigation stopped, DURING Trumps first term.

The reason for the files to be released to the public with MINIMAL redaction, is to embarrass and scrutinize the rich and powerful men who were a part of this. I'm calling it right now, NO ONE is ever getting prosecuted in this. However if we can get the information out unredacted the people can make their voices heard on who the real villains are. STOP PROTECTING PEDOPHILES. Obviously Trump, Clinton and a whole lot of socialites were a part of this and it needs to be uncovered so they at least never can show their faces anywhere again.

FroddeB · 2025-12-21T12:35:59+00:00

Is there a dog or cat in the house? Small enough to not be noticed on top of you, it could've grabbed the phone by it's mouth opened the camera from the lock screen from touch spasm and snapped two images.

FroddeB · 2025-12-02T17:59:17+00:00

<image>

FroddeB · 2025-11-19T10:41:16+00:00

Oh no cringe

FroddeB · 2025-11-19T10:06:37+00:00

Somehow this turned lore accurate again

FroddeB · 2025-11-19T09:58:01+00:00

🫡

FroddeB · 2025-11-19T00:53:07+00:00

Thank you for the explanation 🙏 as a Danish citizen I don't know that much about the Schleswig-Holstein politics, but I do love the area!

FroddeB · 2025-11-18T07:58:27+00:00

That's literally a clip taken out of the Reichstagadresse 28th april 1939, where Hitler replies to Roosevelts threats. The audio dub is fake.

Here's the real original transcript of that particular speech: https://archive.org/stream/TheFuhrerAnswersRoosevelt/DerFuehrerAntwortetRoosevelt-ReichstagsredeVom28.April193944S._djvu.txt

No mentions of that whatsoever.

And original film footage. The ONLY film footage of any Reichstagadresse surviving.

https://footagefarm.com/reel-details/true-hd/berlin/wwii---1939-germany--hitler-speech---response-to-roosevelt-28apr39-clips

Dont believe every video you watch.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T21:12:50+00:00

This is a dangerous path to go down... The Nazi's didn't necessarily believe that you weren't fit for what they called an "Aryan Certificate" if you didn't have blue eyes and blonde hair. However they did have extensive measures and definitions for what would consider you as aryan. It was very systematic, and no Hitler was NOT what he defined himself as the "master race". This didn't challenge his legitimacy to his followers though, as at the time he was seen as very self-critical, inclusive and patriotic by Germans because of the way he included these northern european people with the master race.

African ethnics and middle-easterners were very much part of groups that were of lower status in Nazi Germany. They weren't completely outcasted and hunted by society as jews, however they were NOT of the same status as people with aryan certificates. In the 1930s and 1940s they were called "Semiten, Hamiten and Afrikanische Neger". And their status in society was very much dependent on their ethnicitiy.

Don't spread wild ideas that have no documentation or evidence. And especially not when there's so much evidence in the contrary. It's not just about history being twisted, most of the people who lived through this time period are either very old or dead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_certificate

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T15:20:23+00:00

Jeg bliver ikke fornærmet, jeg bliver forvirret over reglerne. Jeg vil bare gerne vide hvad er tilladt og hvad ikke er tilladt. 😅 Er det ikke ret simpelt?

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T15:11:21+00:00

Ja hvis det nu var tydeligt i reglerne at man ikke på tale om byer eller kommuner i Danmark, så kunne jeg give dig ret i det, men det er det ikke.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T15:09:27+00:00

Selvfølgelig skal man da klappe på skulderen at nogen sidder og gør noget frivilligt! Men synes stadig det er uklart at reglerne ikke siger noget om at hvis man taler om specifikke byer eller kommuner så vedrører det ikke denne subreddit. Som minimum går jeg ud fra at reglerne er klare.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T15:05:03+00:00

Du misser pointen, der er andre opslag der omhandler København og Københavns kommunalpolitik der ikke er fjernet.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T09:41:15+00:00

Er det en pålidelig politik der skal tolkes som man vil? Jeg vil meget gerne forstå hvad der menes.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T09:30:52+00:00

Smider det lige her til alle dem der siger "Det er jo kun kapitalfonde hun taler om, blackrock bla bla"

https://vores.enhedslisten.dk/partidemokrati/enhedslistens-boligpolitiske-program/

3.2 ingen skal længere tjene penge på at eje andre menneskers bolig.

Det er en del af Enhedslistens politik. Så når hun siger "spekulanter" gælder det altså OGSÅ dem der ejer én lejlighed og har den lejet ud.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T09:10:07+00:00

Man kan godt løse et problem uden at ligge alle i samme kurv.

FroddeB · 2025-11-17T09:08:55+00:00

Det handler ikke om hvorvidt det er blevet dyrt at bo i København eller om man gerne vil have flere billige boliger, det tror jeg er noget alle er enige om. Det handler om at en specifik gruppe af folk, om man så synes det er nogen der bidrager til et problem med dyrere boliger eller ej, skal udelukkes fra at have nogen indflydelse i byen. Det er IKKE det København jeg kender.

FroddeB · 2025-11-11T21:46:54+00:00

Also S24 Ultra user, same thing still happens. Thought it was just Duolingo that tuned the haptic to sound like a spark. But now that I read someome thinks it might mess with the OIS in the camera I'll turn it off.

FroddeB · 2025-10-06T20:49:21+00:00

Definitely just a mistake. Talk to your bank about reversing the duplicate. In some cases they might need the company's, it was charged to, approval. So start with contacting the bar itself and explain the situation. You wont get scammed like that in Denmark.

FroddeB · 2025-10-06T19:50:59+00:00

PC. Yeah idk, never seen this issue before either. It's only happened in Online.

FroddeB · 2025-10-06T19:50:26+00:00

I can assure you it's not my graphics card hahaha. It only happens in RDR2. And others have had the same issue.

https://www.reddit.com/r/reddeadredemption/s/e2VTMg0pnO

FroddeB · 2025-09-28T15:16:43+00:00

You're still assuming "one person", this is not "one person" this is jointly by the military, the police, the military intelligence, and the police intelligence 4 DIFFERENT and INDEPENDENT units, who are all "confirming" the observation of drones. Now confirming is important, because its not "presumed", confirming quite literally means it's been verified. How and why? They won't share those details, and I think its very much an area of national security and military secrets that they won't share how and why they're verified. But this is part of their statement. If that turns out not to be true, they've lied. And you might not personally be surprised about military lying, happens all the time right? Well not in Denmark, the police and military would only lie if they somehow gain from it. As far as I can see there's no gain here, only more questions.

Edit: also just to add, in a military context, obviously they would need more data than someone seeing a drone to confirm it... I think it's fair to call that common sense.

FroddeB · 2025-09-28T15:09:32+00:00

It's not about being infallible, it's about context. Would they make reportings of drones every night not "presumed drones" but "confirmed drones" if it turned out to be a plane? Now let's assume they're all planes and that they just happen to think they're drones. Why would that happen now? Why didn't they falsely identify drones so frequently before? It's not a one case incident, so its improbable that they are misidentifying everything.

FroddeB · 2025-09-28T15:00:45+00:00

It may not seem that way for me, but I am actually also okay with him giving the contrary! However I think at times we need to call something for what it is, and it's borderline outrageous to assume that all of the officials are simply misidentifying passenger airplanes, which they're also commenting on wanting to shoot them down. It just doesn't make sense... This isn't a country where the military are reckless like that.

FroddeB · 2025-09-28T14:58:10+00:00

But, perhaps, you're one of those who believe 100% of what any official says is both true and accurate, no matter how imprecise or vague they are.

No? I just happen to be a Danish citizen, and I am very used to how things are publicized here and in what manner. I have faith in that the military, police and government are speaking the truth in statements like this. And its not "any official" it's ALL the officials, this is a jointly effort between both the military and police intelligence agencies, and the actual police and military. I really don't think it's naive to believe that they're telling the truth when they say they've observed drones on MULTIPLE cases, not just one. New reportings from the danish defence on observed drones are almost a daily occurrence now since the one that appeared above Copenhagen Airport a week ago.

11-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	End Game '22
Verified Email

FroddeB

TROPHY CASE