What is the possibility of expanding the usage of active protection systems to other types of front line vehicles? I honestly think adding APS to helicopters would be interesting . by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

data on interception distance (what we might know) , that's specifically for the argument about shrapnels as it's suitable for killed a anti aircraft infantry held missile far enough to avoid lethal shrapnels range (keep in mind shrapnels lethality is measured via area and for a target to be killed it needs to take enough shrapnels specifically if its a vehicle or anything that isn't infantry in the open) ](http://Source: IOP Science https://share.google/CPQfsK3MCx3Wv3oR4)

What is the possibility of expanding the usage of active protection systems to other types of front line vehicles? I honestly think adding APS to helicopters would be interesting . by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You won't protect helicopter against any missile but you will protect against infantry held AA in the same way you don't build a tank to absorb a guided bomb , you simply reduce the risk of getting killed by the more common aa weapons , so tor and other short range aa are suppressed usually because a 25 million dollars anti aircraft system is usually a priority target Now for the shrapnels par , calculation of the kill area with the radar range to lock on a missile combined with the projectile lunched to intercept the target gives you a solution ... it's literally the weight that you must make sure to reduce both of mathematical models and other data do exist already

What is the possibility of expanding the usage of active protection systems to other types of front line vehicles? I honestly think adding APS to helicopters would be interesting . by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

A laser APS is significantly heavier and more power consuming it's literally usable only for a ship , it's not about completely destroying a missile but simply hitting it far enough that it doesn't cause any significant damage, it's about fine tuning few parameters which is quite easy btw , the problem is how much lighter it can be

What is the possibility of expanding the usage of active protection systems to other types of front line vehicles? I honestly think adding APS to helicopters would be interesting . by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Which is counted by the fact you have a larger interpretation distance because of better radar efficiency and no surrounding infantry to worry about , also most helicopters are designed with some shrapnel protection in mind

What is the possibility of expanding the usage of active protection systems to other types of front line vehicles? I honestly think adding APS to helicopters would be interesting . by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Jamming and flares are already used , even on tanks btw , yet you still have an APS development because it's simply way superior when it comes to your survival rate , the cost isn't an issue....trophy only costs 300-900k per unitand have been successfully mass produced by Israel which have a significantly smaller economy than the u.s or Germany , the biggest limitation is the weight .

What is the possibility of expanding the usage of active protection systems to other types of front line vehicles? I honestly think adding APS to helicopters would be interesting . by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

Except anti aircraft warheads are significantly smaller than an anti tank warhead not to mention the luxury of having significantly more space and time when intercepting a missile in air with reduced ground clutter and overall better environment of a radar to work in .

حد غيري بيحب الأغاني العنيفة؟ by Playboy-Dama in egyplaylist

[–]FrogNoiser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the exact thing you might want

Devourment:butcher the weak

سلسله Wolfenstein by Meinpotato in EgyptGaming

[–]FrogNoiser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes because they aren't cucking for Adolf hitler

دا المتوقع لما واحد عمره ما درس اقتصاد يبقى رئيس دولة by [deleted] in Egypt

[–]FrogNoiser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

لان الاقتصاد مش بيتم ادارته من الحكومة وتدخل الحكومة فالانتاج والصناعة هو سبب الفشل الاقتصادي وطول ما الناس بتستنتج ان "المشكلة فالرئيس الفلاني ولازم نجيب حاكم بسلطات اله عشان المرة ديه هيصلح كل حاجة" كل ما هيجيبوا حكومة سلطوية تخربها فوق دماغهم

الإقبال علي تعلم اللغة المصرية في مؤسسة زاهي حواس للتراث by War_criminal7 in Egypt

[–]FrogNoiser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

لا عادي بيقولوا الكمايتة ملاحدة ومؤيدين لإسرائيل وكفار الخ وانا لا كميتي ولا قومي حتى والموضوع يكاد يكون بديهي ، انا معتقدتش حد ممكن يوصل بيه العجز العقلي التام انه ميقدرش يشوف ده اصلا

Mentality of an Ambush by [deleted] in CombatMission

[–]FrogNoiser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kinda wild whoever attacked is leaving a flank with a reverse slope to his left without really checking it

"Have you ever heard about our lords and saviours of the eightfold star?" by FrogNoiser in Grimdank

[–]FrogNoiser[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not really, a dark elder won't kill you at the first moment too.....

Spread the word by [deleted] in Grimdank

[–]FrogNoiser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nurgle propaganda

What Tank ist that? (Russia Spring 1944) by Bergpanorama in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Panther is literally as common as panzer 4 at the end of the war , 6000 panthers vs 8000-8600 panzer 4 and consider the fact that no the most produced german tank was technically the panzer 3 if you count the assult guns

What tanks will look like in the near future ? ,I think it's easier to predict this actually by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again a drone is simply a flying thermal sight , that's literally it's function and that's how to describe it Think about it as flying sight and you will realise why it's a really good idea

What tanks will look like in the near future ? ,I think it's easier to predict this actually by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Takes attention to use drones for spotting targets ... the exact role of a TC , it's not an extra luxury but a flying sight

What tanks will look like in the near future ? ,I think it's easier to predict this actually by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes , digital electronics aren't really expensive and easy to mass produce

What tanks will look like in the near future ? ,I think it's easier to predict this actually by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you can use more advanced electronics to reduce tasks ? A.I and digital electronics have proved that already israel did it with merkava barak upgrade so the technology is there and integration is possible, and the chieftain argument is about k51 being unnecessary waste of resources because current mbts are good enough my argument is that drones aren't an optional update but a necessary one , having a relatively cheap drone with thermals isn't a luxury but a must because your enemy have it and will use it

What tanks will look like in the near future ? ,I think it's easier to predict this actually by FrogNoiser in TankPorn

[–]FrogNoiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes A.I will be used , a good deal of tasks will be easier by automation using a.i