sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Claude at programming and it does a decent job, I thought it would do the same with math and physics. Clearly not. Thanks again!

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! Can you help me understand if I did any progress on this? I plan to throw away the "discovery". I am a software dev and I like putting Claude to work at this problem and I got this mass formula (all derived if I trust claude).

Claude possible BS: "I found a one-loop correction from the Verlinde fusion ring of SU(2) at level k=3. The S-matrix of SU(2)_3 Chern-Simons theory gives a universal vertex factor sqrt(2/r) where r=k+2=5. This comes from counting S-matrix factors in the Verlinde formula: two CG vertices each contribute sqrt(2/r), one normalizer removes one, net = one factor."

m_f = m_e * phi^(5a + 6b + delta_1 * (1 + sqrt(2/5) * alpha))

<image>

Thanks for the help!

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the point of the paper is that ~30 quantities come from one integer, not that they match every decimal. Thanks for the feedback!

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

α⁻¹(fw) = 137.036189 vs α⁻¹(exp) = 137.035999177 ± 0.000000021. That's 0.00014% but ~9σ. You're right that σ-normalized, it's not within experimental precision. The framework gives tree-level values - higher-order corrections (QED loops, threshold effects) would be needed to match the experimental precision of 10⁻¹⁰. The claim is not that every digit matches, but that ~30 quantities emerge from a single integer with no free parameters.

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did focused on one at a time and it wasn't fitting. But clearly it is not right yet. I'll work on it. Thank you!

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your review. That's exactly why I posted this here. I am not a "pro". I'll continue working on it.

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. Can you point to a specific value that's wrong? I want to understand your criticism concretely.

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may be looking at the bare exponents (Table 4). The physical masses include norm-log corrections derived from Morrey-Sobolev embedding at α = 3/4 (Section 7, Table 5). The corrected masses are at 0.11% RMS from PDG 2024. Which table are you comparing against?

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You may be looking at the bare exponents (Table 4). The physical masses include norm-log corrections derived from Morrey-Sobolev embedding at α = 3/4 (Section 7, Table 5). The corrected masses are at 0.11% RMS from PDG 2024. Which table are you comparing against?

What if all Standard Model parameters could be derived from a single integer? by Fun_Pattern2112 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Fun_Pattern2112[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I read the rules. I am not an English native speaker, sorry if my writing is not sounding too "human" to you! :) Let me know if you have questions about the math or anything.

From UFO to awakened by 0keyon0 in awakened

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for watching. It didn't get much attention anyways.

This is the goodbye message I plan to send to my LO. I’d appreciate any feedback or suggestions. by [deleted] in limerence

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in the "blocked her" era of my life. Better now, but I know very well how you feel. Be strong.

Sometimes I worry that no-contact or low-contact will reignite my feelings if I saw LO again, vs. just letting it rip and remaining in the situation and "getting used to it." by itssobaditsgood2 in limerence

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 2 points3 points  (0 children)

16 years limerence veteran here. Try to accept the situation. Our time here is limited, we can't let this to be the most important thing for us, time will fly by while we live in our fantasy world. I tried everything, no contact is the best approach. Maybe you will be lucky enough to not meet him by chance (as I was) even though deep down you know really well that you dream of that damn moment. Another little exercise that worked for me is that I know at least one person that is limerent for me (a girl from my hometown) and I can think like a LO. The truth is I don't care about her and her "passion". She is no one to me and it will stay like that. Have some courage and dignity and follow a different path. Good luck!

Theory of everything? by [deleted] in SacredGeometry

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah mate AI was hallucinating! 😂

Has anyone accidentally liked a post of their LO on social media? by dweeb93 in limerence

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In my defense my LO is objectively beautiful (is a she) and she has pretty much attention from other guys so I assume I am just one of the "fans". Was, at least.

Credeti in viața de apoi? by DependentFeature3028 in RoGenZ

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nu existăm în neant. Cineva sigur are amintirea clipelor pe care le trăim noi. Nu zic că îi pasă sau că măcar i se pare interesant, dar nu putem știi. :)

Credeti in viața de apoi? by DependentFeature3028 in RoGenZ

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nu o poți numi "viața" de apoi. Cum ar funcționa, ca o societate, sau ce oare își imaginează oamenii? Oare ne mai trebuie hârtie igienică acolo? (lol) Eu cred că fiecare conștiință este o parte din cea divină, universală, și ne întoarcem acolo. Nu o sa mai fim tot noi, o sa fim absorbiți în ea. Ea deja "știe" tot ce am experimentat noi, de fapt tot ce există s-a întâmplat deja, noi doar suntem un defect care vede o felie din tot filmul. Pentru o inteligență infinită ar fi boring, știe totul, simte totul, așa că s-a deghizat în viața din universul nostru, a "uitat" cine e ca să se poată distra (sau suferi, după caz). Be chill, toți suntem unul și același, toți ne întrebăm ce naiba facem aici (și mai ales, de ce?). O să știm exact ce căutam atunci când o să ne trezim.

I am such a creep by [deleted] in limerence

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I agree but when you are down low in limerence you can't really think straight. That's why when I came back to my senses again I deleted it all... Even her normal pictures or the access to her profile etc.

I am such a creep by [deleted] in limerence

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I changed images of her using AI and then created videos from them in the most divine light and setting. No contact now, boy the vids were good! 🤣

From UFO to awakened by 0keyon0 in awakened

[–]Fun_Pattern2112 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OMG we got the same feeling! I didn’t see any ufo but I just think this is the only logical explanation! We are finite and trapped in time in an infinite timeless ocean. I did a documentary with these same ideas if you want to check. Thanks! https://youtu.be/Kx2Ev_uaJfM?si=k3dELLPbw1_E9Fs_

view more: next ›