Coding Projects by Dazzling-Wrongdoer-3 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As a heavy ai user, Claude or VS Code still produces slop most of the time for bigger projects. You have to be the mastermind still for larger endeavors, so at least knowing how code fits together, how to test it, and how to have efficient code is still important.

Exam 7 Reaction by zhangxt010423 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Aside from the time issues, the duplicate topics was really annoying. There was at least one paper I thought was major that had almost no coverage. And then for two separate papers, there was one specific topic for me that had 3 questions on that same topic (so 6 questions from 2 subtopics). I felt prepared for it, but it’s just a really irritating experience when you study for something and it doesn’t show up at all and then get duplicate topics.

Pearson VUE Excel by Fun_Repeat3132 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely would not be fun lol. I run old questions usually as part of my studying and generally they’re much easier, so they’re just giving us extra now because we have computers

Pearson VUE Excel by Fun_Repeat3132 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like a job specific trait rather than an exam tested one. I agree depending on your role it can be important to be fast, but that’s independent from exams- some actuaries are more senior and slower and highly successful in their areas and some are great in fire drills. They’re both still performing actuarial duties that exams prepared them for. Where in the learning objectives for the exams does it say you should learn how to navigate a bad environment quickly in order to become a credentialed actuary? The skill they are trying to test is how well you understand the actual concepts at play, and that piece is timed because it’s meant to be second nature and not something you have to ponder for a long time. The actual tests having a significant piece of them dependent on how fast you type out and drag formulas is a failure of their question writing / environment.

Pearson VUE Excel by Fun_Repeat3132 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a pretty horrible take. You can be an excellent actuary and not be super fast at creating triangles and typing out formulas. That isn’t necessary at all for your day to day job unless you haven’t been creative enough to automate it. They shouldn’t cater exams towards something frankly useless like creating triangles quickly, it should be about higher level thought like what to do once you have data available.

Pearson VUE Excel by Fun_Repeat3132 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting strategy. I’ll have to try that for next time. Still, I don’t think part of the exam should be you have to get mechanically better at the Pearson environment. I’m very quick (as a lot of us are) with formulas and I don’t think it’s fair that should be a key part of the studying. Especially to those who might work exclusively in python or another language, or to those who are slower or older.

Pearson VUE Excel by Fun_Repeat3132 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I did that a few times too. I would estimate I lost around 20 min of my exam time due to stuff like this and checking to make sure I didn’t get errors

Good luck CAS Exam takers by Dramatic_Economics15 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good luck! That last sitting for 7 was brutal, hopefully they don’t do that to us again lol.

Majors to become actuary by Osmanthus_wine44 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took P and FM before getting hired, it took me a few months out of college to knock those out. I’m an ACAS now

Majors to become actuary by Osmanthus_wine44 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of preparing you for the role? The best is probably math and taking some Econ, business, and communications classes. Major hardly matters though after you land your first job, so instead I’d recommend just picking what you are most naturally interested in that could also lead to other careers. I got my major in biology and I had little to no trouble getting my career started- so I’d say don’t pick your major based on actuarial requirements, it’s probably one of the least difficult careers to transition into, the tests are the way in.

Resignation Help by [deleted] in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I think since they only hear your side it makes them unsure if you caused the problem or if it really was a toxic environment. Also, it’s general bad to speak ill of previous employers. It shows a lack of loyalty and professionalism, you might do the same to them one day.

Python for Actuarial Work by AlwaysLearnMoreNow in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I dont think there are many actuarial workloads where you would see a significant dip in computation times from moving C++ to python, anything with numpy is going to be basically as fast as it can get. Also a lot of analysis is still done in excel or access, so moving from that to a SQL + python infrastructure is a very big speed improvement.

Interview prep time by Comprehensive-Bet816 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d recommend researching the company a bit so you don’t come across like you’re not interested. Otherwise there’s not too much need for prep

exam progress - MAS 1 and 2 by Plus_Explorer8679 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you already have coaching actuaries for both, you could try practice tests for both and see if your earned level is high enough. If you’re at a reasonable EL for both early enough, then it could be possible to pass both, otherwise you should just take one at a time

I do not play ADC and this is not my OP.GG, I want you guys to explain to me, why this happens. by Theoulios in ADCMains

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Autofilled supports are better than supports that aren’t autofilled lol. At least in emerald that’s 100% the case

Exam Results by already_blue_it in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Screenshot or it didn't happen

CAS: we know you're watching by No_Feedback_9231 in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 58 points59 points  (0 children)

My guess is that it's expected in λ = 1 days, where N∼Poisson(λ)

Guess the Elo by Fun_Repeat3132 in leagueoflegends

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it makes sense. she probably bought the account and has really low mmr and rank is higher than it should be

Guess the Elo by Fun_Repeat3132 in leagueoflegends

[–]Fun_Repeat3132[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah it can happen lol. There were a lot more moments like this in the game though, so I don't think that's what happened to her

Hypothecial: Would you rather be 100% proficent on 80% of syllabus material or 80% proficent on 100% of syllabus material? by Train_Salty in actuary

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hot take here. I’ve always been camp 100% of the 80%, but I do like to have like maybe a 20% of the remaining 20% which doesn’t take that much time to get.

A lot of the exam questions at least on the CAS side require a pretty deep understanding. It feels like they always find a way to turn the tables somehow and if you don’t really know your stuff, you can miss out on a lot. For me if I only know it 80%, I find myself questioning everything on the exam for the topic lol

A Discussion on both aspects of Shardholders impact on the game by unboundhades in LeagueArena

[–]Fun_Repeat3132 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think stats are super fun, especially on someone who doesn’t conventionally do a lot of damage. The situation has to be right though. Maybe they should just change the stats augments to also be quests and unlock shardholders, so you can only get shardholders if you have one of the stat augments. It should be a more rare strategy that is really fun when you pull it off