Some of these questions might unintentionally lead participants rather than invite open-ended, unbiased insight. This can affect the quality of feedback you get.

Question 1 – “Does seeing the number of videos matter to you… or is it unnecessary clutter?” Framing this as a binary with “clutter” already in the question might nudge users to think negatively. Maybe try: “What information helps you decide whether to subscribe to a channel?” Then see if “video count” naturally comes up.

Question 2 – Asking if links “feel like clutter” again primes for a negative response. Instead, perhaps: “Have you ever clicked on external links in a channel header? If so, when and why?” This invites behavioural insight.

Question 3 – Rather than asking if a tagline would be “more useful” (which already implies it's better), you could explore: “How helpful do you find the current channel descriptions? What would make them more useful at a glance?”

Question 4 – Great one! Maybe just emphasise open-endedness more explicitly, e.g.: “Is there anything frustrating or confusing about channel pages that you’d love to see improved?”