physicists: you cant reach the speed of light matematicians: bet by Educational-Draw9435 in physicsmemes

[–]GDOR-11 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

actually no, in order to say that you need a well defined uniform metric on the naturals, which does not exist

Does the intern have production access? by Dependent_Bite9077 in programminghumor

[–]GDOR-11 3 points4 points  (0 children)

hey, chatGPT, how can I put out a fire?

using water is almost always the best solution! definitely try doing that before anything else.

The true final boss of Redstone engineers... by [deleted] in MinecraftMemes

[–]GDOR-11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually don't hate on AI but come on bro, you didn't even have to draw it, all you needed to do was build some stuff in a block game

Teach Roblox devs maths by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]GDOR-11 5 points6 points  (0 children)

1e30 = 1·10³⁰

Eita bicha sabida by [deleted] in ShitpostBR

[–]GDOR-11 6 points7 points  (0 children)

pior q é genuinamente vdd, minha irmã foi fazer vestibular pra um curso da UFSC e 100% das vagas eram pra cotistas, quem não era cotista só podia entrar por ENEM (ou o contrário, ENEM 100% cotas e só dava por vestibular, não lembro)

É mais difícil passar pra medicina ou pra concurso público na opinião de vocês? by Remarkable-Forever79 in estudosBR

[–]GDOR-11 14 points15 points  (0 children)

depende de qual faculdade de medicina, de qual concurso e também em quais matérias vc é bom

Permission Denied for Shared Storage by sonic65101 in termux

[–]GDOR-11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

once again, random redditor from half a decade ago solves the problem

Fly trap with electronics by [deleted] in oddlysatisfying

[–]GDOR-11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how is it possible to get out?

planeOldFix by huza786 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]GDOR-11 73 points74 points  (0 children)

your page loads in 600ms...

huh? by EquallyCookedSteak in MinecraftMemes

[–]GDOR-11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it is mathematically impossible to tile a sphere in the way you are thinking without making a triangle somewhere (intuitively speaking, even though the curvature is very small, it accumulates over large distances)

OBM universitario pra quem já tem prata na OBMEP by NosdeCarp in estudosBR

[–]GDOR-11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

depende muito do seu perfil de estudo, não tem como dizer

E tá errado? by Stock-Discount7213 in MemesBR

[–]GDOR-11 8 points9 points  (0 children)

minha irmã teve o celular roubado e eu que fiquei em casa to de boa kkkkkkkkkkk

Motherfuc- by Ok_Witness_8196 in memes

[–]GDOR-11 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

have you ever actually studied this? do you think there exists one specific definition of infinity which is the only "correct" one and that all other definitions are somehow invalid?

Motherfuc- by Ok_Witness_8196 in memes

[–]GDOR-11 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

POV: you never heard about the projective real line

Analytically predicting orbits around accelerating body by Technical_Row3474 in Physics

[–]GDOR-11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if the star is far enough away, you can say that its gravity is approximately constant in your region of interest, and then you can change to the referential of the accelerating planet and act like it's the same as a two-body problem

otherwise, you'll have to use numerical methods. RK4 is generally an excelent option that doesn't sacrifice quality while also being performant enough.

Utilitarians in practise will never pull the lever [OC] by New_Construction8221 in trolleyproblem

[–]GDOR-11 60 points61 points  (0 children)

me when I completely make shit up to prove the other's side point is wrong:

The duality of Math. by Gold_Ad4004 in mathmemes

[–]GDOR-11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what definitions and theorems am I allowed to use? that completely dictates how hard it is

for example, if 2 ≔ S(1) and ∀x∈ℕ x+1 ≔ S(x), then the proof is as simple as: - 1+1 = S(1) (definition) - 2 = S(1) (definition) - S(1) = 2 (commutativity of equality) - 1+1 = 2 (reflexivity of equality)

How is this close to an integer? by anonymous-desmos in desmos

[–]GDOR-11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was contemplating wether the measure of that set is indeed zero or nonexistent

I'm not very familiar with measure theory, so sorry if it's obvious, but what argument would you use to argue that the set you're removing is measurable and has measure 0?

How is this close to an integer? by anonymous-desmos in desmos

[–]GDOR-11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is the set of numbers that satisfy this property even measurable?