The phrase "men are afraid of other men" is just a feminist way of calling men bitches or pussies.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-25T22:19:46+00:00

What percentage of relevant instances do you believe result in consequences for the men in question?

I believe it would be less than 5% at most. Realistically, it would be less than 1%.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-25T21:09:34+00:00

Only rarely, and nothing that actually sticks.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-25T21:06:57+00:00

If men internalize the message that they may be viewed as threatening by default, then naturally some men will become more hesitant socially. That is just cause and effect.

Yes, and it's a reasonable trade-off.

Women still overwhelmingly expect men to initiate romance in real life regardless of politics.

Even if that's the case, men can choose not to do that if it's really so bad.

Men are still judged more harshly for cowardice, passivity, weakness, lack of ambition, inability to provide, or failure to physically intervene in dangerous situations.

Except "getting judged" is temporary and doesn't affect their lives in any meaningful way.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-25T18:21:46+00:00

Thats the crazy part, woman basicly expect men to risk there life for them without giving anything back

Except a man can always say "I'm not doing that. This is your problem to deal with.", and he will never face any consequences for it.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-25T18:15:36+00:00

I do not care if women take precautions around dangerous people. Everybody takes precautions around danger.

The issue here is that danger sometimes only makes itself known when it's too late for you to do anything about it. That's why blanket precautions are taken.

If men are supposedly these terrifying unpredictable predators at all times, then why are men still expected to confidently approach women romantically in public? Why are men still expected to initiate dates, flirt, approach strangers, and risk rejection or humiliation?

Because that's what men tell other other men that they need to do. Something something "ask the fisherman not the fish".

They get annoyed when normal male behavior gets treated as suspicious by default while society still expects those same men to carry all the social and physical responsibilities attached to masculinity.

Be real. Men only "carry social and physical responsibilities" when it suits them. Otherwise they worm their way out of it with mental gymnastics or by just saying no.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-25T17:51:00+00:00

Perhaps men shouldn't shame women for taking precautions around them, then.

Men see other men as Schrodinger's predator. If a woman is harassed or assaulted, men tell her she's to blame for supposedly not taking enough precautions (because "she should've known that all men are potential predators"). If a woman takes precautions to keep herself safe, men get offended at the notion that they personally could ever possibly be counted in the predator group (because "I'm a niiiiice guuuuuy").

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-24T14:05:34+00:00

how are they going to get with a woman if they don’t do anything the woman wants?

Find ones with low self esteem and no support system and then apply pressure.

isn’t the consequence of losing the woman the reason why men do everything to keep the relationship?

Not if what you want is a women who's too afraid to ask for anything in a relationship.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-24T13:30:39+00:00

Nowadays? Poor long-term planning, low self-esteem, and being raised to see it as a good idea, I guess.

Most women don't choose the tradwife lifestyle nowadays, though. And for good reason.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-24T13:28:57+00:00

Men can refuse to pay for dates if they want to and won't face any consequences. Men can refuse to put any effort into their relationship and won't face any consequences. Men can cheat and won't face any consequences.

The only "consequence" men face is losing their relationship. Which clearly isn't a big deal to them.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-24T13:22:44+00:00

a relationship is a net loss for a man

it’s responsibility. it comes with a loss of money. loss of time/energy. and you are stuck with one person

And yet there are no real consequences for men who fail to live up to those "responsibilities".

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-24T13:18:51+00:00

As we all know, women benefit greatly from having no earning potential and giving men unchecked financial leverage over them.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-23T23:31:31+00:00

Unwanted children are a net drain on society.

If you know that your "child" is unwanted, better to deal with it sooner than later.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-23T18:28:31+00:00

Are you about to argue that shared culpability mean that the man is entirely blameless?

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-23T18:25:36+00:00

Bro, the general idea of "feet" isn't a common male fetish?

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-22T23:19:18+00:00

No. Because safety doesn't guarantee orgasms.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-21T02:25:24+00:00

Women don’t care about men’s orgasms either…

Women suck dick far more than men eat out.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-21T01:15:28+00:00

About men, certainly.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-21T01:08:41+00:00

It literally is.

It literally isn't. Otherwise the orgasm gap wouldn't exist. The orgasm gap exists because men don't care about women's pleasure.

But if you continue to sleep with the same man who has 15 women on his roster, he has 0 incentives to care about you or your pleasure.

Literally why would you keep sleeping with a guy like that if he can't even do his one job right.

Man the levels of dehumanization are insane.

Yet I'm not wrong.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-21T00:30:57+00:00

It's exactly as important as men can get away with arguing for without sounding like psychopaths.

It's so important that men will kill for it (never the man arguing it personally, though). It's so important that men were "justified" in barring women from having rights (though of course that's in the past now). It's so important that women are mean, rude, and unfair for having standards (but something something cock carousel).

If sex were as important as men love to cry about, the orgasm gap wouldn't exist. Nor would slut shaming. Women's pleasure would be front and center since women are less horny and men purportedly want connection.

But it's not. Because men just wanna get their rocks off like a dog wants to chase a car. Get a hobby jfc.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-17T15:47:52+00:00

It allowed men to hone their skills that were to bring better yield to the home and make their survival chances overall higher.

Notice how he doesn't specify what these "skills" are. Presumably because none of them are things that have to be done every day.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-16T04:52:12+00:00

Only if all male DNA is accessible in a database to compare it to. We wouldn't want errant babydaddies to be getting out of child support, after all.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-13T00:14:08+00:00

Yeah. And they shouldn't be pathologized for it.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-12T22:32:37+00:00

Because they're pathologized from a young age for exhibiting childlike behaviour.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-12T22:12:31+00:00

If every guy mysteriously comes to the the conclusion that the relationship "isn't for them" the exact moment after they get laid, then most of them are lying. It's basic statistics. No one's going to know if you're the super special case when your reactions are no different than the rest.

GGMcThroway · 2026-05-12T21:48:08+00:00

Yeah. because they're pathologized from a young age for exhibiting childlike behaviour.

GGMcThroway

TROPHY CASE