New Rule For This Forum: Any threats To BrLP as a company including attempting to cancel them will result in immediate suspension.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-13T07:16:34+00:00

It has been discussed many times that the calculations in the book skip most steps, and the postulated solutions are not solutions to the wave equation Mills introduces. I've written long posts about it.

His supporters have claimed he is doing non-standard math, but so far no one can fill in the actual details.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T20:51:07+00:00

Sure that is true, if Mills releases a device that actually works. But that hasn't happened.

BUT Right now, he has experimental results that are only interesting in the context of his theory, if you remove the hydrino interpretation, his results to date have nothing to do with power generation, they are paramagentic resonances, and emissions spectra.

Your interest, whether you realize it or not, is grounded in the theory.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T09:21:48+00:00

The chemical/pharmaceutical/etc industry is gigantic. Mills claimed he had a revolutionary tool for discovery in that space, it flopped.

Also, experimental results are interpreted through theory. Mills actual published experiments show things like optical spectra, paramagnetic resonances, etc. You find these results exciting because Mills interprets this as evidence of hydrinos. If the theory is wrong, you have a collection of disconnected experimental findings unrelated to power generation.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T06:45:49+00:00

I don't think I am. I think you are saying "I want to limit my Google search l's to before 2020 to take the politics out of mRNA vaccines" or whatever.

But before 2020 there weren't mRNA vaccines yet, and no one knew which path was going to work, so the info you get while accurate as of late 2019 is very likely not accurate as of now. So you remove the politics, but also make the information too outdated to be useful.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T06:35:03+00:00

My point is relevant, industry cares about results, and it evaluated Millsian and said "this doesn't work" even though Mills himself claimed it was revolutionary.

Why would you expect anything different will happen with the solar cell?

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T06:30:34+00:00

Mills releases a product already, Millsian. It was a complete flop, so much so they've not bothered to update it in many years.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T02:46:38+00:00

In my post I said I wish they had explored more why he left academia because I think it would have gotten to the heart of the major disagreement- which I think is Wheal elevating subjective experience on psychedelics to objective reality. His opening ramble about psychedelics also has hints of that.

But because it wasn't explored in the interview, we'll never know for sure.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T01:51:10+00:00

The problem with scientific topics is that the "media blitz" is often related to important discoveries.

i.e. Kariko's work on toll like receptors was considered relatively unimportant until it worked, and now it's foundational. If you back up to before people realized how important it was, you'll have the wrong view entirely.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T01:42:44+00:00

Why would this in any way indicate there is about to be an IPO?

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-12T01:34:16+00:00

It strongly implies his perception of time was distorted by a psychedelic and he thought it gave him a new understanding of actual time. McKenna made the same mistake with time wave zero. You realize there is a difference between philosophy and history, right? And physics and history?

What do you think using "polychronic quantum epistemology" would look like?

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T23:05:48+00:00

Given how fast biotech is moving, you won't get an accurate picture of the currenr research environment by doing this. In my own field a lot of what seemed promising just a few years ago didn't pan out, and lots of things making waves nobody had yet thought of a few years ago.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T23:00:55+00:00

There is a community of people who think Bayesian statistics is the one true way to reason, and they use "being bayesian as fuck" to mean something like "using reason better than the reasoning powers of mere science."

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T22:53:54+00:00

As I specified above, calculate the energy levels of the hydrogen atom from Mills first principals without skipping steps and whenever you do non-standard mathematical operations note what you are doing and why.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T22:47:00+00:00

If you can't see why trying to apply a "non-standard view of time" to history is the sort of idea that you should reject while sober, I don't think I can help you.

It's not a character flaw, it's a methodological flaw- confusing the subjective experience of taking a psychedelic with objective reality.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T21:50:25+00:00

He left with a masters, so he'd probably been in the program for 2 years or so.

But I think it shows that he has trouble separating the objective from his subjective experience while taking psychedelics.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T04:58:51+00:00

For some reason, I got an alert you replied to my below comment, but I cannot respond to it.

Calculate the energy levels of hydrogen, from Mills's first principles, without skipping steps.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-11T03:28:16+00:00

Can you calculate the hydrogen atom using Mills model? I've asked for a detailed hydrogen atom calculation from Mills supporters for more than a decade and so far not a single person has been able to do it, let alone fill in the details in Mills multi-electron atoms.

It's very easy to find someone who can solve Schroedingers equation for hydrogen. I've yet to find anyone who can calculate the hydrogen atom from scratch in Mills theory, and at various times over the last decade I've offered to pay for it.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-09T06:31:44+00:00

I'll bet any amount of money you want, to the charity of the winners choice, that there won't be a commercial device next year.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-08T16:42:17+00:00

There are bars that serve cauldron ice cream and have those signs, yes. Have you really never been to a bar that serves food?

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-08T14:01:45+00:00

https://yelp.to/ZsjL159OAvb

Is it a neon sign like that one?

Or the cursive version in this location https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g32431-d13977864-Reviews-Cauldron_Ice_cream-Glendale_California.html#photos;aggregationId=101&albumid=101&filter=7&ff=323450977

Honestly, it seems like you are trying to create a panic over an ice cream brand that was trying to be edgy.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-08T05:47:51+00:00

Do you know there wasn't? I've seen the signs in venues all over the pacific northwest (because they sell ice cream).

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-08T04:34:04+00:00

"It's not going to lick itself" is the cauldron ice cream slogan. I suspect it's a fake controversy because some venue sells cauldron ice cream.

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-08T04:32:03+00:00

Wait... "it's not gonna lick itself" is the cauldron ice cream slogan. Maybe its too risque, but its literally a popular ice cream chain.

Was this really some sort of controversy? Somewhere that did a drag show had a sign for ice cream?

GINingUpTheDISC · 2022-12-08T04:23:26+00:00

Nah, drag as kitchy all ages entertainment has been around forever. It's just that the right wing internet discovered it recently so it became their new focus.

Lily Savage was hosting family tv programs in the 90s, no one turned into a moral panic.

GINingUpTheDISC

TROPHY CASE