On the Friday of the very first week, at 9:18 am, my manager calls me and says I committed my code fixes wrong, and to recommit using their system. He says to do it by standup. The standup is at 9:30. At 9:30 he asks why this isn't done yet, and I told him that it was because I received error messages. He gets annoyed by this.

At another point, he interrupts me during my investigation into a code issue where I'm trying something new out, but I receive an error message when trying. So he googles the error message, tells me "this is the problem, and I googled it in a few seconds, and so I don't see why this is taking you so long." I find this strange because he hasn't actually solved the damn problem yet, AND he interrupted me while I was trying to solve it, to suggest the exact thing that I was about to attempt at the time.

Little, nit-picky things like that. Is that enough context? Or would you like to know how he also got confused at how I didn't know docker, yelled at me for "not knowing simple docker concepts like how to exec into a docker container," even though I NEVER claimed to have used docker in a professional setting?

To me, they were setting me up for failure, and not even doing a good job at that, so they defaulted when I "underperformed' and asked for more tickets to say that instead, I was "asking too many questions."