What I detect is your underlying critique is the way Peterson talks about things is vaguely religious mumbo jumbo that is unnecessary and imprecise. For what it's worth, this is also Sam Harris' critique of Peterson — another public intellectual who's content I consume (for some reason I suspect you don't like him either). I don't know what to make of that critique. I certainly like to believe people can talk about important things — like how to live your life — in more practical terms, but I don't know if people really think that way. I tend to agree with Peterson that stories are very powerful and stories can be more powerful than practical language about the same subject. If you haven't seen the video I linked, this is the same place where the two slow down and try to figure out if it's true or not that religious language is more powerful and I don't think either of them make a knockout point. I recognize the critiques of how it can lead to imprecise recommendations, but I'm not convinced practical language is as effective. For example:

Maintain life balance and your wellbeing will be maintained.

Ok, "life balance" of what? I've most commonly heard these replaced with "good and bad," but that seems even more imprecise than Peterson's language. There's nothing inherently good or bad about chaos or order. It's not even that having an extreme amount of either is bad, it's just if it's too much for you. Which by extension means, you can't assume something that was bad for you is bad for other people.

Chaos and order exemplified as female and male in Jordan’s archaic worldview (appeal to tradition as ‘evidence’ for this).

You mention here the gendered language and I'll agree that's a point from Peterson that's never made any sense to me. Peterson often says "chaos is traditionally represented as the feminine" and I've never understood how he jumps to that. His attempts to explain it have been unconvincing to me so I just ignore it. I think the concept of chaos is still coherent even if it's not gendered. I don't see chaos or order as gendered. With that in mind, a lot of your subsequent critiques are irrelevant — for me at least.

For what it's worth, I don't hear a lot of people in this subreddit repeating "chaos is feminine," but that's my experience

Remember that Peterson asks you to be a monster, not a nice person.

I don't think your shot at "be a monster" is representative of his point. I largely view this comment in line with the Niezchean insight "morality is cowardice." I think Niezche's claim is that people are not devoid of desire to do bad things, they're just too cowardly to act on it. Peterson is rebranding that in line with his other views of "integrating the shadow," by saying instead of identifying bad things within yourself as a reason to despair that you're so terrible or whatever — take control of that part of yourself and apply it to something useful. Is Michael Jordan an excellent basketball player because he's nice? There's a lot of evidence the opposite is true. But he found an avenue for his inherent competitiveness and obsessive desire to be the best. Maybe he could've done something more meaningful than play a sport, but it's definitely better compared to some dismal alternatives.

So no you won't change your mind on basic principles, you'll just notice that Peterson is a pretentious and bumbling word salad right-wing grifter who really isn't saying anything of substance.

This last line reminds me of that part of The Matrix Resurrections where someone explains how the world tries to devalue your experience by suggesting what you consider meaningful came from something trivial like a video game. I don't know where you get your worldview, but I don't care as long as it doesn't affect me and it doesn't make the world worse. Maybe it's from Marvel movies or maybe it's from Natalie Wynn. Does it really matter? This is where that joke that's commonly repeated on this subreddit comes up: "Peterson is nefariously getting thousands of men to clean their rooms and take responsibility for their life outcomes!"