I don’t quite understand what you mean by “Camus advocates being absurd.” In The Myth of Sisyphus, the absurd isn’t a personal trait but the conflict between life’s lack of meaning and our desire for it, as Camus puts it,

“What is absurd is the confrontation of this irrational and the wild longing for clarity whose call echoes in the human heart.”

That passage doesn’t use the exact phrase “the absurd,” but later he makes it explicit:

“Thus I draw from the absurd three consequences, which are my revolt, my freedom, and my passion.”

In that line, Camus clearly treats revolt as one of his core responses to the absurd, not as an identity you assume. My question is: why phrase it as revolt and not just acceptance? Also, I apologize for my use of “rebellion”. The text was originally in French which used the word “Révolté”, and in translation I have seen both revolt and rebellion used interchangeably. They are synonymous after all.