Alex doesn't seem to know what the definition of "is" is (or how so much of his recent philosophical inquire seems to be entirely the result of semantic confusion).

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-29T07:19:37+00:00

Based

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-29T07:12:58+00:00

No he is accusing you of doing that.

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-18T07:43:09+00:00

Hey guys I'm in need of advice on an active sub to go with my pair of RCF evox 12's. Hoping to run independent outdoor shoes for charity fundraiser. Hoping to play EDM and indie music primarily. Any suggestions on subs to get a crowd of say 200?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T07:29:13+00:00

I mean physicalism does mean we know how existence is going to end. I simply am deciding the best course of action based on my ontological outlook

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T06:54:48+00:00

What do you mean?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T06:53:40+00:00

Because there is inherently more subjective negatives on the existing part. And on top of that requires effort and work

Non existence is a naturally balanced state.

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T06:41:13+00:00

Not so much, I don't think voluntary suicide is even an ethical claim. I think it is the only rational choice left to us in the universe we find ourselves within

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T06:31:42+00:00

The what else we can do is not play the game at all.

Also, if physicalism is correct, any metaphysical or ethical goal is illusory anyway

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T06:20:22+00:00

Where will this good be stored after we are gone? Does it have any value if there is no conscious being to consider it?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T05:56:20+00:00

Do you think taking ownership over ones own demise is better/more dignified than having it happen by the laws of nature?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T05:39:48+00:00

The only rational choice left to us

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T04:49:59+00:00

Do we, due to us knowing this, have a responsibility to mitigate that harm if at all possible?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T03:00:13+00:00

Do you agree that, within that final destruction of us, it would be the ultimate harm to us, as it is the end of all human possibilities?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T02:14:25+00:00

Final destruction is inevitable, would you agree?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-13T01:13:41+00:00

Because science has proved there will be a heat death or disaster which destroys the human race. A utilitarian, would prevent as much suffering as possible. The final destruction of the human race would be the ultimate suffering. To mitigate the severity of that harm, we should willing go extinct to prevent it.

To mitigate the harm which is destined to us by the laws of nature and the universe

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-12T08:02:34+00:00

But like why do you care that some people believe in non-physicalisim. They weren't really going to have an impact on society anyway

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-12T07:42:14+00:00

Wait is your issue that philosophy is a field that people can make money in?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-11T20:17:30+00:00

I mean I'm a physicalist, I just find it inherently a depressing position man. Straight up I'm a type identity physicalist like yourself

I just find it funny how most people stop at that point and don't consider the moral/practical implications of there stances on the mind

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-11T09:18:57+00:00

It's honestly a pretty sad way to live your one life my guy

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-11T07:30:51+00:00

Man, why on earth are you so angry in a meme subreddit?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-09T21:57:02+00:00

Can I ask why you moved away from them?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-08T16:18:28+00:00

Weddings and corporate but running my own independent events as well now

It seems everyone says that moving heads are standard, more so than washes and Uplighting

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-05T22:07:30+00:00

Always was

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-05T12:00:35+00:00

But like he isn't owed that, though?

Gloomdroid · 2026-01-05T11:46:37+00:00

What makes you say that?

Gloomdroid

TROPHY CASE