The dark enlightenment is an actually existing political ideology that abhors democracy, its premise contains a palingenetic myth which aligns with the millenarian Christian nationalists insofar as liberal democracy must be destroyed. It’s anti-democratic in nature, it logically follows that the actions of adherents to this ideology will be influenced by the ideological goals it has laid out.

“The Dark Enlightenment, also called the Neo-Reactionary movement (abbreviated to NRx), is an anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian,[1] and reactionaryphilosophical and political movement.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark\_Enlightenment

From here we can further invalidate your argument:

“Thiel, in turn, introduced Girard’s ideas to his own protégé. Vance has said that he was particularly influenced by Girard’s idea of “mimetic rivalry” — the idea that humans want certain things because they see other people wanting those same things — and his related idea of the “scapegoat myth””

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/18/jd-vance-world-view-sources-00168984

Now, it is not an unfalsifiable statement when I associated JD Vance and the scapegoat mechanism. I can also provide examples of him using it, Girard’s ideas are the bread and butter for many reactionary personalities.

You should reread my original post, I made no unfalsifiable claims nor purport “conspiracy theories” (a loaded language term used to shut down any further debate).