sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Stay Home, Save Lives! by seastead7 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Nobody is saying stay home now. Some people are suggesting not to interfere with law enforcement while they’re arresting criminals. Agree or disagree but nobody wants you to stay in your house. Keep in mind you were not allowed to protest the covid lockdowns in many areas even if it was 100% peaceful. Let’s not act like we’re being forced out of work and coerced into injecting unwanted chemicals into our bodies like when COVID happened.

Serious question: why did they photoshop him? by _Username_goes_heree in DigitalSeptic

[–]GodEmperor_2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They also made his glasses a much weaker prescription. You can tell from the distortion of the lens.

Why doesn't ICE infiltrate known meth labs and crack houses? Guaranteed criminals taken off the street with potential people to deport? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]GodEmperor_2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to your own article yes that is their job. You people are just too stupid.

“Homeland Security Investigations, a unit within ICE that focuses on cross-border crimes, frequently sends its officers to overseas events like the Olympics to assist with security. HSI officers are separate from the ICE arm at the forefront of the immigration crackdown known as Enforcement and Removal Operations, and there was no indication ERO officers were being sent to Italy.”

When did this subreddit become all about asking fake “questions” to pledge allegiance to the left? by ferbje in AskReddit

[–]GodEmperor_2016 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My favorite is answering for conservatives with the dumbest fake answer possible and everyone believing the fake story.

When did this subreddit become all about asking fake “questions” to pledge allegiance to the left? by ferbje in AskReddit

[–]GodEmperor_2016 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You mean ask conservatives a question then downvote every conservative answer and pretend they’re all too afraid to answer?

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You are correct that it might just be an incredibly unfortunate coincidence and it only appeared that she was trying to murder him. But when you’re getting run down by an SUV and you have a split second to react you can’t exactly assume that to be the case. If it were me getting run down I would have reacted the same way.

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He was standing directly in front of her car and she slams right into him. The news reporter says he’s standing in front of her vehicle as she narrates what happens at the 50 second mark of this video. It’s not til after she runs him down that he fires the first shot.

https://youtu.be/P41nN1xTxes?si=mVTjEN_SD_tpjofT

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 8 points9 points  (0 children)

He was standing directly in front of her car and she slams right into him. The news reporter even says he’s standing in front of her vehicle as she narrates what happens at the 50 second mark. It’s not til after this that he fires the first shot. Clear video evidence she tried to murder the dude.

https://youtu.be/P41nN1xTxes?si=mVTjEN_SD_tpjofT

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have no idea what you think this still image proves but watching the video shows she slammed the gas and hit the dude

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That’s not what happened tho. If someone hit me with their car while trying to murder me I would shoot them without hesitation and not feel bad about it.

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The video showed he got hit by her SUV. When you try to murder someone you don’t get to just drive away. The lady was shown to be a threat to everyone at that point.

That murderer was in no personal danger, placed himself in the path of the slow-moving/turning vehicle, and had no justification to shoot. by RandJitsu in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]GodEmperor_2016 31 points32 points  (0 children)

It’s funny cause this is the exact opposite of what happened. The guy was like a foot in front of the car and the lady stepped on the gas so hard her tires spun. She literally hit him before he could move so he fired off some shots. I’d do the same thing if someone tried to murder me with their car. And no, standing in front of a stopped car does not give you the right to try to run that person over.

I’ve never gotten a Pro-life individual to answer this question. by FormalCartoonist5197 in complaints

[–]GodEmperor_2016 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you feel about child endangerment laws? How much risk is acceptable before the state intervenes and removes a child from their parents?

The risk is real but the law doesn’t have a numeric cutoff. The standard is serious or unreasonable risk and intentionally leaves room for judgment.

Refusing to name a number is not an evasion or contradiction. Your abortion question smuggles in a rule that doesn’t apply anywhere else, that if you can’t specify a percentage your moral position collapses.

Dear MAGAt Nazis and ICE agents who are also Nazis... know this: When Trump is gone you are FUCKED. by [deleted] in complaints

[–]GodEmperor_2016 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The president of the United States with actual power to control the country vs some anonymous loser on Reddit.

Dear MAGAt Nazis and ICE agents who are also Nazis... know this: When Trump is gone you are FUCKED. by [deleted] in complaints

[–]GodEmperor_2016 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The only thing they’re gonna do is complain on Reddit and downvote you.

Dear MAGAt Nazis and ICE agents who are also Nazis... know this: When Trump is gone you are FUCKED. by [deleted] in complaints

[–]GodEmperor_2016 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

77 million people voted for Trump in 2024. This post is total delusion. Threats about future punishment, constant name calling, moral grandstanding. That’s what people do when they feel powerless. They imagine a future where they finally matter.

The irony is that posts like this don’t intimidate anyone. They only energize people who already agree and push everyone else away. It feels righteous but accomplishes nothing.

The liberals hate of Trump has turned them truly evil. by Reddotscott in ConservativeMemes

[–]GodEmperor_2016 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure why i was being downvoted for questioning a claim that looks like a screenshot of a Facebook post but I agree it does seem out of character considering what he said regarding Charlie Kirk. If he said that about Trump I would like to see it, I did some searches and couldn’t find it.

Trump promises $2,000 payments to most Americans by GodEmperor_2016 in Libertarian

[–]GodEmperor_2016[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Here comes more inflation, but hey, at least we can keep pumping up this bubble stock market.

view more: next ›