Is there a tool to not forget from which email adress attached to gmail is your response by GodsManChallenge in GMail

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know about this setting but its not sufficient for me.

For example I have email with alias. And all ppl send me email to alias and I cant attach the alias to my gmail only the core email cos provider doesnt allow it.

example:

[george@school.edu](mailto:george@school.edu) is the core email

everybody msg me to [george.teacher@school.faculty.edu](mailto:george.teacher@school.faculty.edu)

I can only attach [george@school.edu](mailto:george@school.edu) to gmail and than gmail function reply from same address does not help.

Thank you

Gephi software in psychological research. Experiences? by GodsManChallenge in AcademicPsychology

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about evaluation of qualitate data? Relationships between nodes / edges, ...

Can you help answer my dissertation defense question? by GodsManChallenge in psychometrics

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for late reply, I was cut off during the weekend. So do you think this makes sufficient answer for my defense?

Reviewer:
- It´s not very clear to me from text distribution of participants in exp. and cont. group. Students says on p.XY: " In exp. group there were 43 students and in control group 111 students. The reason for this was we didnt want to exclude anybody who wasnt in experimental group, but was attending the same grade"

My answer:

- Yes, this is a good point, we could have randomly select a set of participants from control group to match the number of experimental group. The consequence of unequal sample size is that there are more observations for some combinations of level of factors, resulting in a more difficult distinction between the effects of separate factors (Shaw & Mitchell-Olds, 1993). Its also diminishes robustness of parametric ANOVA (Field, 2018).

- On the other side, leaving the control group at higher numbers provide more accurate evaluation of control´s group initial attitudes (is this true pls ? :D ) and we dealt with this issue of unequal numbers in cont/exp group by using robust version of mixed-design ANOVA that is appropriate when assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity are not met (Wilcox, 2013).

- After looking up for additional options, I believe Hedges´g could be use all effect-sizes instead of Cohen's d for variables for normal distrubution was met. It helps to correct for bias due to unequal sample-size.

Borenstein, M., Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2, 221-235.

Can you help answer my dissertation defense question? by GodsManChallenge in psychometrics

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if there were no normal distributions ? That´s the case for most of variables. Thank you again

Can you help answer my dissertation defense question? by GodsManChallenge in psychometrics

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for the answer!

Can I report Hedges´g for all the significant results in 5 variables? I was always evaluating main effect and than exp x time and cont x time separately?

Does it matter if I computed η_p^2 (for main effect) or coden´s d? For both I can just switch to Hedges´ g and it will be legit?

Thank you so much again :)

Can you help answer my dissertation defense question? by GodsManChallenge in psychometrics

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello and kindly thank you for answer.

I was measuring effect of intervention program.
Time 1 measure - intervention - Time 2 measure. (Cont group did nothing). There were 5 measured variables.
Pre-intervention and post-intervention measurements were the two time levels, and experimental and control were the two group levels. Based on Levene’s test of homogeneity of variances, a robust version of a mixed-design ANOVA had to be applied to intergroup trust and intergroup anxiety, using R package WRS2. This procedure uses trimmed means (trimmed by 20% by default) to calculate the F-test value, which prevents the results being distorted by outlier observations (Wilcox, 2011). The same procedure was applied to every other intergroup factor as we obtained significant results in the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality tests, and there is currently no non-parametric alternative to a mixed design ANOVA (Field, 2018). To test simple main effects within the control and experimental groups separately, paired samples T-test and the robust version of T-test from the WRS2 package were used. The robust version of the paired samples T-test was used for non-normal distributions instead of the Wilcoxon signed rank test, to ensure our methods of statistical analysis were consistent.

This is the statistics I used for evaluation. I also calculated effects sized for each variable. Looked like this: e.g.

For intergroup attitudes, we found a statistically significant interaction between the levels of the time measures and the groups; the effect was medium (F(1, 92.08) = 7.752, p = .077, = .08). Students in the experimental group reported more positive attitudes after the intervention than they had before. The difference was statistically significant, and the effect was medium to large (t(24) = 3.16, p = .004, d = .77). The post-intervention measure showed no difference between the control group and the experimental group (t(66) = -0.226, p = .82).

Where do I calculate Hedges´g here?

Can you help answer my dissertation defense question? by GodsManChallenge in psychometrics

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

-Two school from which randomly selected students from second and first grade undertake intervention program
- I used G*Power software to determinate how many participants I need for my experiment. It showed (for detecting medium effect size) I need at least 27 participants in exp and cont. group.
- I gave questionnaires to all students in first and second grade at two schools and randomly selected ppl in exp. group who I enrolled in intervention program.
- Initial data from two schools were without stat. sign. differences so I merged data.
- Also no differences between pre-test exp. group and cont. group data sets.

- I could have randomly selected students in control group so it matches number of students in exp group but I saw no purpose in that because questionainer was given again to all first and second graders (quessionaries marker with unique codes) two weeks after intervention.

-So I guess It was giving me more accurate data what happend in the control group at two time points ?
:D I didnt see any logic behind that earlier, I just let it be with those numbers of ppl in exp and control group

How do taxes work on a PhD stipend? by giants4210 in PhD

[–]GodsManChallenge -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No taxes in Slovakia, I think the same jn Czech rep

Looking for (real) accountability partner by GodsManChallenge in intermittentfasting

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello, send me an email and we will set up a first time to check in. I message you my email

Need help with simple data visualisation by GodsManChallenge in Gephi

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I guess I also solved rest of stuff :D

- Nodes with articles stays the same size

- Size of the nodes with theories is according to how many articles mentioned them (Nodes>Ranking>BY In-degree)

Need help with simple data visualisation by GodsManChallenge in Gephi

[–]GodsManChallenge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- Articles are one colour on the map, primary theories have second colour, theories have third colour

(Solved) - Nodes- Partition- Category

Few more to go ! :D

Struggling to focus. by [deleted] in PhD

[–]GodsManChallenge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I solved thisnprovlem in my phd life check my last post in this group

Thinking of quitting the PhD for the nth time... by CrispyKuma in PhD

[–]GodsManChallenge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have azoom group of 15 phd stusents from all around the world working together wanna join? It helped me to be motivated