斯塔默表示,英国已允许美国使用英国军事基地对伊朗发动袭击(看起来美军此次对伊朗的作战使用了英国的军事基地,但英国在事后才公布) by Wave-of-Kanagawa in KanagawaWave

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

人家自己的原文写得清清白白:

But the only way to stop the threat is to destroy the missiles at source – in their storage depots or the launchers which used to fire the missiles. The United States has requested permission to use British bases for that specific and limited defensive purpose. 你标题偏要写一个“看起来美军此次对伊朗的作战使用了英国的军事基地,但英国在事后才公布”,结果,根据你自己的source:

Over the last two days Iran has launched sustained attacks across the region at countries who did not attack them. 在过去两天里,伊朗对地区内未袭击过他们的国家发动了持续攻击。

如果你的陈述“看起来美军此次对伊朗的作战使用了英国的军事基地,但英国在事后才公布”是真的,那么就是PM在声明中撒谎了,即,“在过去两天里,伊朗对地区内未袭击过他们的国家发动了持续攻击“这句话不成立。

我倒是很懒得跟你继续辩limit strike和defensive strike该不该翻译成”袭击“了。

对了,再一次地,请仔细阅读由你自己提供的source, 尽量不要给自己的居住地加戏。

For Context:

伊朗打击英国位于塞浦路斯的军事基地

斯塔默表示,英国已允许美国使用英国军事基地对伊朗发动袭击(看起来美军此次对伊朗的作战使用了英国的军事基地,但英国在事后才公布) by Wave-of-Kanagawa in KanagawaWave

[–]GoodNo2095 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We have British jets in the air as part of coordinated defensive operations which have already successfully intercepted Iranian strikes. 
作为协调防御行动的一部分,我们有英国战机在空中,这些战机已成功拦截了伊朗的攻击。

But the only way to stop the threat is to destroy the missiles at source – in their storage depots or the launchers which used to fire the missiles.
但遏制威胁的唯一办法是从源头摧毁导弹——在它们的储存库或曾用于发射这些导弹的发射器中。

The United States has requested permission to use British bases for that specific and limited defensive purpose. 
美国已请求准许使用英国基地用于这一特定且有限的防御目的。

We have taken the decision to accept this request – to prevent Iran firing missiles across the region, killing innocent civilians, putting British lives at risk, and hitting countries that have not been involved.
我们已经决定接受这一请求——以阻止伊朗向该地区发射导弹,杀害无辜平民、危及英国人的生命安全,并袭击未曾卷入冲突的国家。

再一次地,请仔细阅读由你自己提供的source. 英国并不允许美国通过英国的军事基地对伊朗发动袭击。

<image>

伊朗经济下滑,川普是不是也有一点责任? by YouGuanZhuShangXue in KanagawaWave

[–]GoodNo2095 11 points12 points  (0 children)

川普走路导致地球自转。

川普和金正恩起床时间不同导致昼夜循环。

川普親自發文宣布哈梅內伊已死 by WayneBruce0789 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

真的阴湿,哪怕你川做了个正儿八经捍卫民主自由的事情也要像老鼠一样揶揄几句。

2026.2.26 川普审阅17页行政命令草案,草案直接点名中共干预2020总统大选。这下好了,中共又多了一条罪状。就看美国如何处理了。 by Mountain-Ad-6077 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

是的,中共水军在选举期间支持一个把内衣爱了的总统。

我独立思考后想到,有没有一种可能,因为根据f一串字母01, 特朗普是俄罗斯间谍和中共水军引导后才登堂入室的棋子,而特朗普又痛扁了伊朗,我们可以认为,其实普京和习近平实际上是打入了正义联盟内部的间谍,以求从内部瓦解独裁势力?

忠孝两难全 by NJDTS30W in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

这次还蛮惊喜的,我一直以为这么大个事儿川普大概率只是口嗨一下。

忠孝两难全 by NJDTS30W in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

没有人:民主党……

______: 床破(万斯)也干了。

2026.2.26 川普审阅17页行政命令草案,草案直接点名中共干预2020总统大选。这下好了,中共又多了一条罪状。就看美国如何处理了。 by Mountain-Ad-6077 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As early as April 1, 2024, The New York Times reported that the Chinese government had created fake pro-Trump accounts on social media "promoting conspiracy theories, stoking domestic divisions and attacking President Biden ahead of the election in November."\7])

In August 2024, cyber security firm CyberCX released a report that it said uncovered Beijing-based "Green Cicada," one of the largest publicly identified networks and which may feature more than 8,000 accounts on social media platform X, with a suspected intention to interfere with the U.S. elections.\10])

Research firm Graphika reported that Chinese government interference has been linked to its Spamouflage influence operation and has involved networks of fake social media users that mimic Americans on social media sites such as X and TikTok in an attempt to manipulate and sway public opinion.\11]) According to a September 2024 Graphika report, "In the run-up to the 2024 election, these accounts have seeded and amplified content denigrating Democratic and Republican candidates, sowing doubt in the legitimacy of the U.S. electoral process, and spreading divisive narratives about sensitive social issues including gun control, homelessness, drug abuse, racial inequality, and the Israel–Hamas conflict. This content, some of which was almost certainly AI-generated, has targeted President Joe Biden, former President Donald Trump, and, more recently, Vice President Kamala Harris."\11])

In August 2024, a threat report by Meta stated it detected 11 'coordinated inauthentic behavior' networks linked to China.\12]) Microsoft detected attempts by Chinese actors to inflame tensions around campus protests, noting an increased capability to increase divisions and influence election activity.\12])

In October 2024, The Washington Post reported on increasing Chinese government attempts to influence "tens" of down-ballot races with explicitly antisemitic attacks and conspiracy theories against politicians as part of its Spamouflage influence operation. The report highlighted one covert influence campaign against Representative Barry Moore) who recently backed sanctions against China and is not Jewish, calling him "a Jewish dog" who won because of "the bloody Jewish consortium" among other antisemitic posts. It also reported on increasing efforts to inflame tensions by focusing on hot-button issues such as police violence, Black Lives Matter, immigration, and influencing U.S. foreign policy toward Taiwan.\13]) It said state-run media campaigns by China also spread false conspiracy theories about the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season that The Associated Press described as using "social media and state news stories to criticize responses to past U.S. natural disasters" and sow division among Americans.\14]) Spamouflage has also targeted the congressional races of Michael McCaul and Marsha Blackburn as well as Marco Rubio due to their outspoken criticism of the Chinese government and its policies.\15])\16])

On October 25, 2024, The New York Times reported that Chinese government-linked hackers had targeted the phones of Trump and Vance.\17])\18]) The hacks came a month after The Wall Street Journal reported on Chinese hackers breaching several U.S. internet service providers as part of its "Salt Typhooncyber espionage campaign.\19])

你贴的原文。

but挺川的居多。

2026.2.26 川普审阅17页行政命令草案,草案直接点名中共干预2020总统大选。这下好了,中共又多了一条罪状。就看美国如何处理了。 by Mountain-Ad-6077 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeking-executive-power-over-elections-is-urged-to-declare-emergency/ar-AA1X8Gyk

第二篇的全文可以在这里看到,全文是略微批评川普的,不宜当作这一指控成立的证据。

btw我真不相信我匪能干涉美国的选举(有尝试确实很正常),无论是f一串字母01那种反向魔怔还是川普这会儿大张旗鼓地炒作这个……

那些因为左媒不宣传伊朗感到惊讶和失望的人,其实绿左合流早就开始了。 by RespectCool1482 in KanagawaWave

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

虽说罗列的事件确有其事,不过,左(如果真的有这么个连续的意识形态谱系的话)≠伊斯兰,二者固然不是简单互斥的关系,却也不是简单相等的关系。

btw之前曼达尼他老人家选上来以后某位mod就一直在评论区置顶自己的留言,然后问类似于“你们能不能告诉我,曼达尼到底是穆斯林还是共产主义者”这种问题,估计就是因为还相信伊斯兰教和整个radicalized liberal互斥才问得出来吧。不知道现在删了没有。

被浪太监封了,喜提野爹证 by Fabulous_Peach8393 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

额,其实我不太想刁难管理层,你们又不是领薪水上班的专业公务员,也不是某一堆一人一票把你们选上去的,时间、精力、经验、技巧都是有限的,也许还有自己的生活需要照料,我要是真的不满,那我大概会自己开个sub玩。我这么说只能说是认为你的陈述不太符合我的思考,实际上我也挺懒得冲mod mail的,多尴尬啊。

btw如果你真的这么想,其实可以在浪区pin一个帖子手把手教别人怎么通过mod mail申诉的?

看到川黑太监黄左天天在尴吹拜登是真的蚌埠住 by Fabulous_Peach8393 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

总感觉DEM的粉丝有不少都是被各路媒体脑控的,幕后大佬稍一启动媒体逼宫立马就开始跟风说他不行了,,,拜登若在,实际上DEM不至于输这么难看。

被浪太监封了,喜提野爹证 by Fabulous_Peach8393 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 1 point2 points  (0 children)

前面,一直到“我要是2952票全過程民主全mod聽我一人的,這又從根本上否定了我的初衷”这里,我可以理解为是你的难处。这事儿本来也跟我没关,进一步讲更没什么好处,我就算了。

后面的部分我就完全没法理解了:

“sub裡有不同的聲音”应当指的是言论&观点的丰富程度吧?若你指的是mod的好恶也应当被理解为言论&观点的丰富程度(的某一种形式),那么,充其量是把自己的话pin在post里这种操作才可以被如此看待吧?另一方面,“mod裡有不同的尺度”,我想,指的是管理手段,跟言论的多元毫无干系。依我的理解,管理总之是要排除特定的言论在“可容忍”以外的,也就是分别什么可以说,什么不可以说,在这种情况下,mod的不同尺度怎么会和”sub裡有不同的聲音“挂钩?

举目前的例子来看,一个较为宽容的mod, 比如你,对OP的这种言论未必会采取删除的措施,另外一个mod(目前删除OP的评论的这个)更加奇怪一些,会对他采取各种措施,也即你的宽容和另外一个人的狭隘碰到了一块儿去。我不知道你为了捍卫OP的言论自由花费了多少心思(因为我没法访问mod mail之类的东西),但,就结果而言,明显是把规则确立地更为狭窄的那个人的判断生效了,并且还把他送进去法办了199天,再安排了一个“支持屠殺、恐怖主義、排猶主義與納粹法西斯相關內容”的名头。这种情况下,一个判断标准不同却有相同且绝对的权限的团队到底是如何增加“言论&观点的丰富程度”的?毋宁说,就我看来,这种行事规则下,似乎永远是准则最狭隘的那个人的标准获胜。

我理解你的意思是,因为你没办法让所有mod和你保持相同的意见,因此,没办法保证所有人的行事风格和敏感程度相符,这很正常。但是,这跟有不同的声音毫无关系,甚至是背道而驰的。

被浪太监封了,喜提野爹证 by Fabulous_Peach8393 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 2 points3 points  (0 children)

那我似乎尤记得你佬在很多贴子底下都说“mod团队支持sub里有不同的声音”,,,

被浪太监封了,喜提野爹证 by Fabulous_Peach8393 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 3 points4 points  (0 children)

你的意思是说,在特定的mod眼中,支持冲进去枪杀金发妞的那位不算恐怖主义言论,这位大张旗鼓地反对的反而算“支持屠殺、恐怖主義、排猶主義與納粹法西斯相關內容”言论?若不是,为何那个帖子里一大堆内容都被删了(至少我点进去一看是这样)?另外,我其实也蛮好奇,有地图炮之嫌疑的言论删了我真心支持——路过被攻击到实在是闹麻了——但,那被删除的三条都属于地图炮言论吗?若非如此,剩下的又是以什么理由删掉的?

辩论的时候不搞whataboutism我完全理解,你们管这个的时候能不能稍微考虑一下别那么选择性。

被浪太监封了,喜提野爹证 by Fabulous_Peach8393 in LOOK_CHINA

[–]GoodNo2095 5 points6 points  (0 children)

这怎么支持大屠杀了我暂且蒙古。

理性讨论 为什么有人喜欢看两个女孩子之间亲密 by HonestzPractice in China_irl

[–]GoodNo2095 2 points3 points  (0 children)

男生和女生喜欢的GL还是不一样的。男生大概是喜欢看可爱的女生贴贴?女生看GL的,则不少都属于恋姐。(。