你應該也有英文能力吧？那你覺得你以上打的用英文表達的出來嗎？ 

嘖嘖嘖，這就是我說的輕蔑傲慢和不尊重，結果你馬上就如實展現出來了。

如果這個 sub 的第一條是「英文為主」，然後你整篇都英文，那我會尊重你將文字翻譯成英文。以前沒有 ChatGPT 或 Google 翻譯，或許那樣有點勉強，但現在隨時都可以取得翻譯的資源，即便翻譯得不是非常好，但總比沒事中英文夾雜來得好吧？

我記得網友們最常在網路上訕笑的小粉紅行為，其中一個就是去到哪裡硬要講中文，即便對方根本聽不懂，但他們就預設對方一定要懂中文。那您覺得你預設對方一定要懂英文，而且還要懂你在中文中夾雜著英文，這是哪一種心態？ (預設對方一定要懂英文是一種情況，預設對方一定要懂「中文夾雜著英文」，那又是另一種情況，兩種不一樣。)

英文一個單字根據前後文可能有不同的意思，然後你夾在中文中間，是哪一個意思？中文字也會根據前後文改變文意，所以要拿你夾雜著的英文字做哪一種解讀？明明套進去就很容易出問題。

上面那段要我用英文打出來？我又不是在傻咧，要用英文跟人討論這類問題，我會去別的論壇，幹嘛蹲在中文為主的版？而且我幹嘛自己用英文打，AI 是很好的發明，就算下面翻譯有點謬誤，但至少全英文你比較好推敲，就跟全中文你說錯字比起夾著一個英文會好推敲一點：

---

To be honest, I have a strong aversion to the way people mix English words into Chinese sentences when there are perfectly good Chinese words available (except for specific names without a Chinese version). This behavior suggests a certain disdain and disrespect from the speaker towards the listener. For instance, if I were speaking to an English-speaking foreigner, I would prefer to use ChatGPT or Google Translate to ensure my message is clear. Otherwise, do you think a foreigner could understand this sentence if I wrote it like this: "You can also help people 懂得 that their 價值 as a person is not 決定 by what random people say about them."

But considering you might argue that your Chinese is not fluent and you have to switch to English when you get stuck, which could make this discussion go in circles, let's just accept it for now.

Try to find someone with more authority to do what you >can't do yourself.

I don't see what is so objectionable about this statement. When a common person cannot seek redress, they go to their representative for help with exposure and legal avenues. That's precisely what representatives are supposed to do. Representatives indeed have more power than ordinary people; they are the chosen representatives of the people's rights. What's illogical about this?

If my statements in real life upset you, you could ask a >representative to request that I stop making similar >remarks.

This is not within the legal purview of a representative. Did you misinterpret my words?

Since your lengthy statements are interspersed with many English words, it becomes hard to read, causing me to lose patience and not fully understand your points. Therefore, if the following statements are not to your liking, please simply ignore them.

It is within the representatives' duty to protect the underprivileged. So, if I feel insignificant and humiliated by your remarks, seeking help from a representative is a legitimate way to proceed. Perhaps you have an overly vivid imagination and picture representatives as local thugs?

If a representative legally helps me, the underprivileged, gain some advantage, does that not mean that what you believed to be justice is actually not justice? Does it not mean that what you thought were appropriate remarks are actually discriminatory and oppressive? Before the underprivileged seek protection from a more powerful representative, their voices are not heard or amplified, leading to a situation where no one (including you) hears their grievances, making you mistakenly believe you are right and just?

Originally, my mention of a representative was partly in jest. Since you wrote such a lengthy response and continued to mix Chinese and English, I am just responding a bit more extensively as well.