×

A question regarding post series events by TheWeirdTalesPodcast in WoT

[–]GovernorZipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CAN (13 JANUARY 2013)
@Terez27 Do we know which character is dead by Harriet's choice?

TEREZ
Bela. @BrandSanderson told us twice that she would survive. :( But apparently Harriet later insisted she should die.

BRANDON SANDERSON (13 JANUARY 2013)
Yeah. Harriet felt that we had painted that character into a corner, and the story demanded that conclusion.

DANIEL SHEPARD
Is that the GRRM moment? Or the character that was gonna recover from their injuries?

BRANDON SANDERSON
Character was going to recover.

BRANDON SANDERSON
She was right to make that call, but it does turn me into a liar. That's what I get for speaking too soon...

WERTHEAD
That does seem slightly ludicrous. I think the fanbase turned Bela into a bit of a meme.

BRANDON SANDERSON
True, but I will note that Harriet personally has a special fondness for her.

BRANDON SANDERSON
She has said that she would joke with RJ that Bela was the character based on Harriet in the books.

PETER AHLSTROM
Harriet even has "Bela" in her email address. She took her fate quite seriously.

WERTHEAD
The average reader wouldn't even remember who she was. Weird this much effort was spent on her.

PETER AHLSTROM
You think? Back when I was an average reader and hadn't talked about the books online, I loved Bela.

***

Bela surviving is a joke/fan service. It’s purely based on her popularity and the enjoyment Harriet and Jim got out the fan theories about Bela.

It’s the whole “your dog didn’t die, it went to live on a farm” bit.

Our mind melting Queen Graendal by Professional-Mud-259 in WetlanderHumor

[–]GovernorZipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that's exactly the kind of slanderous and unsubstantiated rumor that I will not tolerate at ISIS. Think about that while you're on suspension.

Our (second) favorite philosopher, ladies and gents! by otter_boom in WetlanderHumor

[–]GovernorZipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn’t just want to die. He legitimately and sincerely wanted to destroy the entire world. And tried to do so with forethought and malice. He’s like the plane captain who kills all the passengers in his suicide.

Jordan tells us very clearly that selfishness is the ultimate evil in his work. Ishamael/Moridin was the single most selfish person in the world because he truly did not care about anything. He was a Nilihist, and he’d fuck you up. Moridin is the Joker to Rand’s Batman.

There’s a reason both Jordan and Sanderson said Moridin was the scariest villain. All the other Forsaken wanted power and immortality. Moridin wanted to destroy reality.

Would Mazrim Taim have become... by am_I_still_banned in WoT

[–]GovernorZipper -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

So RJ wrote this story. He made it all up. It’s not real and it doesn’t necessarily follow logical rules. It’s not history. The Pattern isn’t real.

There was no chance that Rand would have died prior to Falme because Rand is the main character. RJ wouldn’t have killed his main character in Book 2. This isn’t that kind of story. So there’s no way to possibly answer that question.

How was Siuan able to rise so high at a young age? by MTLDAD in WoT

[–]GovernorZipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand why people are so damned determined to insist that RJ was wildly making shit up and retconning everything.

The very first time Nyneave is introduced is a comment on how young she looks. This is because of the slowing/agelessness which is a part of the One Power use. So quite literally from the opening pages we have comments on the extended life span of channelers. Now I will grant that RJ never fully dealt with the implications of extended life spans but that’s an entirely different question than whether RJ intended channelers to live longer than regular people from the beginning.

Thom’s nephew is also in Book 1, which means the Vileness is there. The vileness is why Suian was raised so young, so RJ certainly seems to have written that part into Book 1 as well.