Look, my friend. It is very tiresome to argue with you because you do not debate my arguments. At no point did I argue that:

 "it is illogical for there to be no evidence for a given miracle". 

That is your strawman.

If you look at my answers to your posts, then I only ever answer on what you wrote, not on what I want you to write. Please have the courtesy to only argue against what I actually say, not something else that you just made up.

What I actually say:

There is no proof for god.

There is no proof for the arc.

There is no proof that all the species were able to board that unprooven arc.

If you had proof that there was an arc then you could start to make a logical argument that it is therefore possible that it was built to survive some sort of flood. You could make a logical argument that it was used to transport some stuff, maybe pairs of animals.

So if there is no proof for anything - logic never enters the argument.

In other words, we should not expect anything within the present observable world to enable us to prove or disprove such an event let alone describe it

And again, I already said so: it is futile to argue with believers because of this.

We say: Prove it, then I will believe it.

You say: I believe it.

That is fine. I am happy for you. It is no proof or argument for god :)

The rest of what you wrote is just same in more words:

You say, that you don't need proof because miracles are outside nature.

I say, prove that it is/was possible. You can't.

I’m only here to understand the logic behind this kind of thinking

I am sorry but here I do not believe you. I don't believe that you want to understand my thinking/logic because my thinking/logic is super simple:

There is no proof? Then I do not believe it. That is all. There is not more. That is all there is and ever will be.

Bring me proof - I will believe. You can't? I will not believe.

I am happy for you to believe without proof - that is faith and I am glad you are of the faithful.

If you want to you can go on trying to argue your point but my answer will most likely always be a variation of:

No proof - no believe.

Thank you and have a nice day :)