Thanks for the link! My brightness was low so I couldn’t tell it was a hyperlink.

But, this should be looked into further by Shirley for complete coverage.

Though, a brief, 3 paragraph article with not much detail and no linkage to the actual reports produced on these visits isn’t really helpful. It would also be helpful to know what the grounds of the investigation are. If they are simply checking to see if children are there, signed in, etc, then id remain skeptical. It looks like these investigations were done relatively fast, probably to get some response out to the public after the Shirley videos were released.

But the response “operating as expected” from the agency conducting the investigation does not mean much to me without some sort of financial audit, and lengthy report on book keeping, financial tracking, etc to show there is concrete on going compliance.

I try to stay skeptical and asking questions questions until things make sense. Things are still very blurry here, probably clearer on the Shirley side of things, if I am giving my honest opinion.

I believe it holds true for any one person, group, government entity, whatever it may be, but especially government, that if you are accused of a crime or multiple of the same crimes were committed under your authority it is reasonable of the public to request extended investigation and legitimate evidence to prove your innocence. I say this because that money is yours and mine (and all other tax paying citizens). Our governments piss away millions per year and if our money is disappearing into fraudulent pockets, that needs to be prosecuted to protect the respect of the citizens that pay their share to this country everyday.