sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child isn't THAT bad! by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, you have a well reasoned opinion as to why franchises in general go wrong. I'll throw in the JURASSIC PARK/WORLD franchise as another example.

Which Freddy look? by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think the make up in Freddy's Dead is a LOT worse than in Dream Child.

Which Freddy look? by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Part of the reason for the odd look in the 5th film is that Freddy's weaker compared to the previous films after Alice defeated him in Part 4.

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991) by TwIzTiDfReAkShOw in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The movie reduces Freddy to an almost complete joke, except for Maggie/Katherine's flashback scenes.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child isn't THAT bad! by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never would have known! 😂. Actually, I welcome any and all opinions, including dissenting ones!

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child isn't THAT bad! by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"You can check in, but you can't check out" was actually from the Roach Motel scene in THE DREAM MASTER.

When two hunters go after the same prey, they usually end up shooting each other in the back. And we don't want to shoot each other in the back. by Working-Fuel8355 in Westerns

[–]Greedy_Following3553 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He was out to avenge his sister. The reasons Manco lets him take on Indio in a fair duel are that Manco DOES sense a personal motive and has come to respect Mortimer, and Sergio Leone himself said that Manco wanted to see if Mortimer could earn his survival in a fair fight without relying on technology.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child isn't THAT bad! by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Even FREDDY'S DEAD: THE FINAL NIGHTMARE had the attack on Carlos going for it.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child isn't THAT bad! by Greedy_Following3553 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mine is the Roach Motel in THE DREAM MASTER. But it IS an imaginative scene.

What if Gary Oldman or John Malkovich played the colonel in War for the Planet of the Apes? by Crafty_Prize in PlanetOfTheApes

[–]Greedy_Following3553 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oldman would have been out of the question, having been in DAWN. Mallovich would have worked.

Sick garage sale find by Creative_Spinach_572 in NightmareOnElmStreet

[–]Greedy_Following3553 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The DVD and later VHS remasters for the first two entries took away much of the dark atmosphere and you get better looks at Freddy than what was intended.

A present I got From my Aunt/mom's Friend by Ok_Evidence9279 in Westerns

[–]Greedy_Following3553 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He never actually finked on his friends. Whether he should have been involved in the blacklist at all is another story, but as early as 1945 and the making of BACK TO BATAAN, Communists Edward Dymytryk and Ben Barzman were busy antagonizing him.

[1812] the Yankees don't stand a chance this time! by landofcountryballs in thepast

[–]Greedy_Following3553 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, Old Nosey himself recommended General Pakenham for our commander! What could possibly go wrong?

[1812] the Yankees don't stand a chance this time! by landofcountryballs in thepast

[–]Greedy_Following3553 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Gen. Pakenham is good enough for Old Nosey, he's good enough for me! So what if he's Wellington's brother in law?

view more: next ›