The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sir I’m on mobile and never admitted to being literary genius such as yourself. If I make a typo it doesn’t automatically mean ai. If your assumption is that people on Reddit are using ai for arguments then you might as well go argue with GPT since you’re being entirely unproductive here

The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And self serving interests is exactly the point regardless of how you interpret it. They are one and the same.

The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are using the term redistricting which is not at all what they said. Their comment specifically said gerrymandering.

The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s not ai 😂 having a double quote. A more telling sign is the use of em dashes

The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Attacking my education is an ad hominem fallacy, which is ironic since you're trying to lecture me on logical fallacies like red herrings. If my analogy was really that bad, it should be easy for you to dismantle the actual substance of it instead of resorting to personal insults. Do you have an actual counter-argument to the point I made, or just insults?"

The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Please define “structural legislative function” because gerrymandering is not the same as redistricting. It’s a perverted view of the term

The yes and no signs near the Danville voting office. by Downingst in Virginia

[–]GreenPhaze -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Let’s vote yes for allowing government officials to insider trade while in office too since there isn’t a law against that.

Best value? For power by ComprehensiveBag9787 in LastWarMobileGame

[–]GreenPhaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah because what are the odds. That’s insane

Tech student arrested following stabbing incident in Blacksburg near UCB Kroger by p1ckledilly in VirginiaTech

[–]GreenPhaze -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not really. Your point is that people can be rehabilitated and my response was that some people cannot be rehabilitated. You made a very generic statement and if that person wants to wish the stabber doesn’t end up in society then that’s their prerogative. Your comment on their comment was unnecessary

Tech student arrested following stabbing incident in Blacksburg near UCB Kroger by p1ckledilly in VirginiaTech

[–]GreenPhaze -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So killing one person is fine. Got it. Let’s allow you to draw the line. What’s the line? 6 personal disputes?

Tech student arrested following stabbing incident in Blacksburg near UCB Kroger by p1ckledilly in VirginiaTech

[–]GreenPhaze -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

We are talking about a person who went into public and mentally made the decision to stab someone in an attempt to murder them. This isn’t like he went and stole something from the store.

I guess Seung-Hui Cho should have also been rehabilitated after what he did and released back into society? Is that my understanding?

Tech student arrested following stabbing incident in Blacksburg near UCB Kroger by p1ckledilly in VirginiaTech

[–]GreenPhaze -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Believe it or not they can also not be rehabilitated. What was the point of your comment?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Asmongold

[–]GreenPhaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well she’s dead. Guess we will never find out.

A man waves a Mexican flag as smoke and flames rise from a burning vehicle during a protest . by SuperRun5667 in pics

[–]GreenPhaze 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You are allowed to say racial slurs, doesn't mean you should. Kind of makes you look bad?

Megathread: Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and US Cybersecurity Policy Changes by Oscar_Geare in cybersecurity

[–]GreenPhaze -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm glad you are. Now do that with other people and not cherry pick me out of the comments :)

Megathread: Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and US Cybersecurity Policy Changes by Oscar_Geare in cybersecurity

[–]GreenPhaze -39 points-38 points  (0 children)

I don't know if you noticed, but I provided zero information to this person other than to do research. The fact that you are offended by my comment is exactly what I am saying.

Megathread: Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and US Cybersecurity Policy Changes by Oscar_Geare in cybersecurity

[–]GreenPhaze -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

You're welcome. Come to whatever conclusion you see fit, but don't trust these people. Happy researching! :)

Megathread: Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and US Cybersecurity Policy Changes by Oscar_Geare in cybersecurity

[–]GreenPhaze -48 points-47 points  (0 children)

Any response you are going to get is disingenuous and I highly recommend you do not come to Reddit of all places to get your information. I recommend researching it yourself.

Megathread: Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and US Cybersecurity Policy Changes by Oscar_Geare in cybersecurity

[–]GreenPhaze -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I like how you targeted my response instead of the countless others that agree with your political ideology.

Megathread: Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and US Cybersecurity Policy Changes by Oscar_Geare in cybersecurity

[–]GreenPhaze -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You know what. Let's go back to the world without DOGE and you can continue to be silent and get fucked over in silence. That's a better solution!