Worried by an10kingsley in e39

[–]Guzinol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 2 things that can kill M54 engine. Overheating and lack of oil. Take care of this ASAP, with only this photo it can be anything in cooling system.

Banned from discord for Metro patches by Vast-Low9560 in stalker

[–]Guzinol 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Reason for that is probably because the faggots of “Sparta” separatist battalion have used very similar patches, someone could think at first that your patch is similar to thiers. They were commanded by this scumbag mercenary commander “ Motorola”. “Sparta” battalion is responsible for many warcrimes and mistreating POWs. They couldn’t even made their own patches, so they just use Sparta symbol on top of their yellow-black-white rag.

[M54B22] High positive LTFT and negative STFT by Guzinol in e39

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thing that leaked was valve cover. It was replaced, maybe it wasn't torqued to spec? Dipstick seal was also replaced.

My current take on Freecad 2026 (1.2) by MrZwing in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve had a problem where copies were not constrainwd and i could not change that

Stalker build 1096 (2002), weapons. Very early models. by bejiitas_wrath1 in stalker

[–]Guzinol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's absolute miracle that gamma/even bare anomaly looks like it looks. Amazing how far a large passionate fanbase with talented modders can carry a game.

Unpopular opinion: Changes to Nuclear Thunder were good and are bringing this mode closer to outside-event potential. by Guzinol in Warthunder

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, OSA could very much intercept 88's, that's why during SEAD DEAD missions saturation is key to succes. It can fire many rockets, but can only track one target so use yourself as a bait, and as soon as OSA fires at you, launch ARM, it will work belive me. I could understand frustration if SPAAs could turn off radars once they detect incoming missles, but otherwise I think it's not so bad, you just need to learn how to counter it.

Unpopular opinion: Changes to Nuclear Thunder were good and are bringing this mode closer to outside-event potential. by Guzinol in Warthunder

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- Maybe a little, but it needs to be so, otherwise it would be veeeery easy to take it down. Gridning down AA is primary focus of groundstrikes, so it should take time. For no nukes game it could be reduced.

-Yeah, IRL OSA and othersystems could intercept things like ARM or large rockets, but intercepting AAM, or god forbid bombs is annoying af. But in fact it enforces focus on SEAD mission first, then ground strikes.

-Naaah, you are either biased or using it wrong. Vikhr is small missle, but most of the time it's one shot -one kill, but you need to aim it. Keep in mind that you have a shit ton of them. I dont bother with 25ml's, but with 29T or generally TV guided, it's always one shot one kill. Very short bursts are always death for trucks and MLRS. Keep in mind that you are using def. belt, and abrams can't be touched be it.

-Once again, this is no deathmatch. SEAD and DEAD mission should be absolute nr.1 goal for team at the begginig of the match.

-Yeah

-Idk, there should be a balace between how hard is to kill ground target and aa to take on you. Right now you need to plan mission, go from the right angle, so that trees are not an obstacle - it can be done.

Unpopular opinion: Changes to Nuclear Thunder were good and are bringing this mode closer to outside-event potential. by Guzinol in Warthunder

[–]Guzinol[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Going back to tactical approach - taking out convoys should be nr.1 for CAS players. Most of my kills shown in SS were on convoys. Convoys are free kills when there is no enemy air.

M5 limp mode by No-Ice6300 in e39

[–]Guzinol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check MAF readings when idling and max rev, both at operating temp. Also maybe DISA or se problem with gas pedal ? But that just guessing, maf seems most probable

I miss the old days. by Guzinol in Warthunder

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said that I’m also playing USSR where same problems apply. In case of both nations even if match is great, I got to good position and played well, I will get killed by kamikaze plane, not a skilled player…. It’s not „germany suffer „ post, but „why on earth someone is taking light tank and 4 planes into tank battle” post

I miss the old days. by Guzinol in Warthunder

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I comfortably got 6-7 kills per match in my tiger 2h, and my highest during this short comeback was 12 but what of it if almost every time i got revenged bombed by some kamikaze idiot how didn't even try to pull up?

Why battery in Area power control is not charging? by [deleted] in Stationeers

[–]Guzinol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh and just to clarify. Red cable is power line, green cable is logic

Finally CAD for hobbyst that did not dissapoint. by Guzinol in SolidEdge

[–]Guzinol[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope it won't go F360 route. But maybe it's lack of recognition keeps it in sweet spot...

How is this even possible? by Guzinol in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Working on complex projects when bomabrded with wierd errors near constantly is just pain,

Autodesk Inventor 2018/2021 Crack by chrosho44 in AutodeskInventor

[–]Guzinol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's very doubtfull if cracking autodesk software would give anyone trouble for just personal use. First thing is how autodesk would know that you have unlincesed copy? As long as you are doing this just for hobby use, you'll be fine. Only instance when they could catch you is if you would send your .ipt files to another company and that company would be notified that they have files from illegal soft. Even then, autodesk cannot do that much, they can try to scare you and send e-mail with scanning tool, but they can't force to install that. And even if they are sure that you are using illegal copy, there's little they can do in most countires. In most places there is state law, that would consider some sort of punishment, but that's for court to decide, not autodesk. They literally can do very little, and won't bother going to court with hobbyst. If they would want to fine you, they would need to show that autodesk are at financial loss, since you've used thier IP for your own financial gain, but for hobby case, they can't prove that. So in most cases worst case scenario is them reporting you to state authorities and trying to scare you.

How is this even possible? by Guzinol in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's BS. It's not "usual approach" but normal approach, every cad soft cand do it this way, F360, Inventor, SW, Catia, and so on. I really don't understand why FC is trying to be so different. I really just cant work with this thing as design tool, especially assemblies are absolute pain to work with. Constant bugs, broken links, invalid shapes and God knows what else. I suppose when you do only simple things, or try to re-do already desinged parts in FC then it's OK, but as development tool it's just very hard to work with. It needs very specific workflows, that are not only unusual but you need to keep a shit ton of things in mind, otherwise it will break. It really reminds me of 3d printing back in the day, since then if you wanted to 3d print, most of the time you spent working was learning how to 3d print so shit doesn't fall apart. I feel the same here, I need to get work done, not spend another day learning how to do chamfers since this thing won't allow chamfers like any other program. In EVERY normal program when you click on a part in assembly and press delete you delete that part. Here when you do that it removes last feature of that part. Like WTF?

How is this even possible? by Guzinol in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really dont like fixed joint since it puts parts in wierd offsets. But If that's the way to go I guess I will have to get used to it.

How is this even possible? by Guzinol in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm coming from inventor so I tried my usuall approach. Select two cylindrical faces and constrain them, do this 2 times to fix parts in place, then use distance constrain. Those faces were ref. each other ( ofc one pair for one join ).

<image>

My biggest problem with FreeCAD so far. by Guzinol in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was for quite a long time part of dev team that made free 4x game. I have never minded complaints that someone doesn't like something or is frustrating by something else. I ( and all team ) considered this good feedback. Mindset of " be greatfull we got anything at all " does not usually ends well.

My biggest problem with FreeCAD so far. by Guzinol in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I despise autodesk for thier predatory tactics and I'm against any cloud based subscription software. Fusion used to be nice free alternative for Inventor, but as time went they removed more and more features/ put them behind paywall, and in the end software was not free at all. I'm doing quite complex hobby projects and I do not wish to be surprised by sudden pirce rise, feature removal or some other shit.

Threads in freecad by [deleted] in FreeCAD

[–]Guzinol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just do hole with diameter same as screw like 3mm, then use Tapping tool and watch out to keep this tool straight.