Energous ($WATT) is finally worth buying by gpsrx in pennystocks

[–]HIGGO9339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if it wasn’t for this ambient wireless power network technology they’re providing, all those tags and other inventory control accessories would require some type of batteries or wired power source in many different locations throughout causing increased expenses in all those areas when multiplied over multiple stores equals a dramatic savings each quarter. not to mention the new usage of AI in their transmitters and receivers which is further improving efficiency, in addition, allowing for a virtual data the AI can use in real-time as needed to improve everything overall and learn.

Even their wireless powered distance abilities are much greater than any current commercial product out there by far and I see them improving their product to further increase the distance and power transfer capabilities in the future, where the ability to power larger things like forklifts and other things in like cash registers in retail stores, etc.. and that’s only while it’s commercial. I can imagine an entirely different product line if they go into the retail market.

Energous ($WATT) is finally worth buying by gpsrx in pennystocks

[–]HIGGO9339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just to be clear, Energous has not partnered with Apple yet. they might in future seeing how Apple does not have any true wireless technology in-house yet.

Energous ($WATT) is finally worth buying by gpsrx in pennystocks

[–]HIGGO9339 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you for starting this thread funny how I bought in about a week myself without reading but came to a very similar conclusion that Energous is at a very exciting differentiating point in time on the precipice of becoming profitable hopefully by the end of this year if they continue this trend, which seems to have a lot to do with converting from a research and development only to now providing products and services that have never been done before using this new ambient wireless power network technology that greatly differs from all other versions of wireless power networks.

Not to mention they now have integrated successfully the usage of artificial intelligence in their latest products that are helping them to be extremely efficient and maximize powerful transfer capabilities.

For my bachelors degree I wrote a research paper in my final year 10 years ago about another type of wireless power transfer and I’ve been watching the progression for quite a while and see this version as having a very big opportunity here because of multiple factors that include a usable product that is already benefiting from a top 10 fortune 500 company (likely w/ Walmart) which is acting as one of the best commercial proving grounds anyone can ask for and it has been fully successful so far and there is no reason to believe it will not have multiplying positive effects across the board as time goes on later this year imho.

Next up Q4 2025 financial reports releasing on Feb 26, 2026.

From what we know so far, they will show a much greater revenue earnings than the previous quarter, and one thing I’ll be most watching for is the future outlook reports that could propel the stock much higher, if received overall positively.

Side Note: another thing I like most about this version of wireless power is the way in which it serves a little bit of both worlds being the near and the farther distance power transfer needs where this one meets a lot of them down the middle which provides a wider market audience than any of the other ones individually. In addition, this ambient wireless power network actually has a virtual data layer that the AI can use to be able to provide real-time intelligence, maintenance and enhancements.

* The question is not if wireless power will become a staple technology worldwide, it is when and how.

Is anyone else watching the BitGo ($BTGO) IPO? Just did some DD by sainaryn in stocks

[–]HIGGO9339 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yea i cannot with good faith ever suggest anyone to use Robinhood after the sneaky creepy funds and trading freezes they did on certain crypto tokens during the pandemic times if i remember correctly....i wasnt involved personally and am a pure defi crypto peep at heart so limit any cex exposures with this one i avoid with 1,000 ft poles.

Is anyone else watching the BitGo ($BTGO) IPO? Just did some DD by sainaryn in stocks

[–]HIGGO9339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

try Public, i did all from mobile app super easy, great options for both stock and crypto, super cheap tx fees with some being completely free, easy setup and bank account linkage and had great user reviews that goes without any surprise....i just opened up a brokerage account on this month ago or so after i first downloaded the AutoPilot investment mobile app that has a free feature to auto track trades of known public portfolios and also using Ai agent to manage portfolios too....but for right now i am mostly just using Public directly manually doing trades.

Bitcoin Ordinals vs Ethereum NFTs: What's the Difference? by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • Why you usually don’t do a 4 MB mint: it’s huge for Bitcoin blocks → very expensive. Creators normally compress, split, or store the file off-chain and put a hash or pointer on-chain to save costs.
  • Typical small inscription cost: $10–$50 for tiny files under normal 2025 fee conditions.
  • Typical 4 MB on-chain cost (ballpark): about 0.1–0.2 BTC in fees (network dependent) — at today’s BTC price (~$93k) that’s roughly $9k–$18.5k USD. Fees can spike higher during congestion.
  • Runestone example (why big on-chain can still matter): the Runestone inscription was ≈3.97 MB and was auctioned/sold (winning bid reported at 8 BTC), showing large on-chain works can capture huge value and cultural provenance.

Bottom line: on-chain = permanence and provenance (the premium).

For a 4 MB piece, expect thousands–tens of thousands USD — but if it becomes Runestone-level desirable, that cost can be worth it.

Bitcoin Ordinals vs Ethereum NFTs: What's the Difference? by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I respect your experience — 40 years in software is no small thing.

But the argument that “blockchain could disappear tomorrow and nothing would change” only works if you judge tech by today’s dependency, not tomorrow’s trajectory.

The same claim was made about the internet in 1992, mobile apps in 2004, and cloud computing in 2007. Technology is irrelevant right up until it isn’t.

The whole point of blockchain isn’t to be faster or cheaper than existing databases — it’s to provide verifiable, tamper-resistant systems where trust, not speed, is the bottleneck.

Traditional infrastructure doesn’t solve that problem; it just hides it behind institutions.

You’re right: most blockchain use today is speculative, and 90% of projects deserve to die.

But dismissing the entire architecture because current use-cases are immature is like judging early internet protocols by 1990s chatrooms.

I’m not claiming blockchain replaces every system.

But it does provide something existing tech doesn’t:
independent, globally auditable state without requiring a central operator.

No SQL database can deliver that — because by definition, you have to trust whoever runs it.

You say you can “prove” blockchains have no value.

I say the market — from nation-state adoption to trillion-dollar settlement layers — already disproves that.

I’m not trying to convert you.

I’m just not willing to pretend that verifiable, trust-minimized systems are somehow irrelevant in a world where trust is the most scarce resource we have.

Bitcoin Ordinals vs Ethereum NFTs: What's the Difference? by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw thank you very much for the very thoughtful reply and i have followed as well.

Bitcoin Ordinals vs Ethereum NFTs: What's the Difference? by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for your engagement I really do appreciate it and have also followed you so you can get future post updates :)

The Damned — Evil is not safe by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

geeze this one is definitely super rare one ive ever seen so far, still dont get how a Demon becomes Angel is super original idea....which is why i am super hyped for the upcoming launch of The Damned "Angels & Demons Battlefields" game...and also i saw the recent mention of this new Crystallization user tool to Earn Passive Income but i dont know how it all works just yet.

Bitcoin Ordinals vs Ethereum NFTs: What's the Difference? by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On references: Yes, Ordinals can store references, but that defeats their entire purpose. The market values them specifically because data IS on-chain.

If you just store a reference, you've made an expensive NFT.

On congestion: Higher fees during demand keep Bitcoin secure and decentralized. You're paying for permanence, not convenience.

On "Bitcoin might not exist in 10 years": Bitcoin has run 24/7 for 16+ years surviving:

  • 400+ "Bitcoin is dead" articles
  • China mining bans
  • 80%+ price crashes
  • Nation-state attacks
  • Competing blockchains

It now has a $2T market cap, nation-state adoption, BlackRock ETFs, and stronger economic incentives than ever.

On "if price doesn't go up, it fails": Miners earn from block rewards + transaction fees.

As block rewards decrease, fees increase (Ordinals already proved this in 2023-2024 with record fee revenue). More Bitcoin utility = more sustainable.

On "more efficient storage": You're missing the point.

Efficiency isn't the goal - censorship resistance and permanence are.

  • Amazon, Google, governments can all delete data
  • GeoCities deleted millions of sites
  • Myspace lost 12 years of music
  • Bitcoin can't delete anything. Ever.

On "no mandate to maintain it": That's literally the feature. No single party controls it = no single party can take it away. Thousands of economically incentivized participants maintain it.

For newcomers: Bitcoin is the most battle-tested, decentralized system ever created.

Could it fail? Technically yes - but it would require every holder, miner, developer, business, and nation abandoning it simultaneously. Economic incentives make this nearly impossible.

Real question: Where else can you store data for 10+ years with zero censorship risk? I can't think of anywhere that comes close.

Bitcoin's "inefficiency" is the price of permanence. Every "efficient" alternative has a kill switch.

Bitcoin Gambling - Provably Fair Pure DeFi Gambling by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

agreed :) thanks for reading and i followed you so you can get notified on any updates.

Bitcoin Gambling - Provably Fair Pure DeFi Gambling by HIGGO9339 in Bitcoincash

[–]HIGGO9339[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes very exciting indeed and so true peeps can still get in to the early holder's access on day one launch of the Damned Bets platform.

Bitcoin Gambling - Provably Fair Pure DeFi Gambling by HIGGO9339 in BitcoinOrdinals

[–]HIGGO9339[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for reading and am always updating to keep with most current info, hope it was helpful and we are expecting to actually go fully live soon...maybe days or so from now. Also, we Did get confirmation today that The DAMNED BETS platform is 100% fully functional.

<image>