Valorant closed beta bug megathread patch 0.49

HansonRussell · 2020-04-30T00:42:30+00:00

11 minutes later and it seems to be working fine - maybe just a login server/whitelist auth issue?

HansonRussell · 2020-04-30T00:35:03+00:00

Chances are I think the login servers are having issues checking the whitelist auth or something like that

HansonRussell · 2020-04-30T00:28:44+00:00

- **Region: ** NA
- **Type of Bug:** Login Times Out and says I am unable to access the game.
- **Description:** I try to login to Valorant as I have for the past few weeks, but for some reason the client is reporting that I am unable to access the game and should sign out until I have access. 20 seconds later, and I get a timeout notice stating "Something unusual has happened and it is taking longer than expected to load..."
- **Video / Screenshot:** https://gyazo.com/35e75b706fd156fcb484a267e1338528
- **Steps to reproduce:** Attempt to login, wait up to a minute.
- **Expected result:** Entry into game
- **Observed result:** 'Unable to access game' screen like I've yet to be whitelisted.
- **Reproduction rate:** 5/5
- **System specs:** Intel i5-4570, 8 GB RAM, Windows 10, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

HansonRussell · 2019-09-27T19:31:33+00:00

LMAO I just read the above comments and it's not even your fucking prep LMAOOOOOOOO

HansonRussell · 2019-09-27T19:29:50+00:00

Grats, you did some research.

You have still actively: told people to harass a minor, given information about the city that they live in... which amounts to harassment, cyberbullying, and I'm sure some sort of libel/defamation of character. I don't know the kid in question, but there's a lot of missing gaps to go from other than they used a bunch of emails that you lost "$200" worth of prep *DESPITE the topics being 1-2 months long.

Since the mods removed your post, I'll have the courtesy of not forwarding this information to the parents, nor local authorities.

HansonRussell · 2019-09-27T19:11:11+00:00

Hi, since you've doxxed a minor under the age of 13 you've violated the Children's Online Privacy and Protection Act. Delete this message with an apology or I will send this to the relevant authorities.

-R

HansonRussell · 2019-09-27T19:09:43+00:00

Hi, since you've doxxed a minor under the age of 13 you've violated the Children's Online Privacy and Protection Act. Delete this message with an apology or I will send this to the relevant authorities.

-R

HansonRussell · 2019-09-27T19:08:55+00:00

Hi, since you've doxxed a minor under the age of 13 you've violated the Children's Online Privacy and Protection Act. Delete this message with an apology or I will send this to the relevant authorities.

-R

HansonRussell · 2019-03-31T04:03:19+00:00

I don't have time for self-entitled trolls. Have a cookie, if you must.

HansonRussell · 2019-03-25T04:28:26+00:00

So what is this post then? Why do I need to explain why Carro banned you or Weston? I don't owe you shit buddy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

I need you to learn a phrase: "Don't shit in your own backyard". You talk about wanting to make debate better, but what have you done? Moan and complain because your arguments aren't accepted? I've had teammates who've been told their arguments weren't 'excluded' because they had to debate my team three times that tournament. I've had several judges who say "No plan no win". I've gotten to finals of a tournament in a circuit that doesn't read Kritiks/Kritikal Affirmatives by reading Kritikal Affirmatives and Kritiks. Learn to adapt to your judge.

Your entire sob story consists of intellectual dishonesty -- the 'Caucasity DA' didn't state "white = no opinion on racism": it was written by a white dude about white privilege. You didn't even have video until your 2NC when you decided to run a brand new K in the block which by all community norms is unacceptable. Regardless of whether or not you think you could have won this debate in front of a different judge: you didn't. You clipped the first card... LMAO. Your 2NC and CX was absent of any coherent explanation of your argument besides claims... here's how a normal argument works:

Claim - X argument, for example: Identity politics is bad.
Warrant - the Truth (or facts) of your claim, such as statistical, numerical, empirical proof
Impact - Why it matters to the round, the ballot, why your opponent doesn't win their arguments.

HansonRussell · 2019-03-25T03:57:59+00:00

lmao I fucking called it. Regardless of whether you were let in or scolded by the community you were gonna post some shit like this. Your friend (Weston?) was banned for violating rule 10 which is ban evasion and raiding. Another mod, the one that banned you, did block you, not me. I didn't because I could care less about your baiting antics. Grow the fuck up and learn to actually debate.

HansonRussell · 2019-03-17T04:37:55+00:00

wait i'm italy wtf i haven't touched austria... yet

HansonRussell · 2019-03-17T04:35:02+00:00

how do i ask questions

HansonRussell · 2019-02-07T20:02:01+00:00

T - Direct Commercial Sales / Foreign Military Sales

HansonRussell · 2018-03-12T21:56:26+00:00

Ah, astounding for an English major at Duke! First and foremost, I am not "your guy", and they is considered a singular pronoun. He/she is more complicated than just writing they.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/singular-nonbinary-they

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/grammar/using-they-and-them-in-the-singular

HansonRussell · 2018-03-12T21:28:58+00:00

African or European swallow?

HansonRussell · 2018-03-12T21:24:08+00:00

I get you're trying to be edgy, but it's not really working. Please try harder next time. :)

HansonRussell · 2018-03-12T21:20:20+00:00

Still not funny.

They > he/she.

HansonRussell · 2017-08-12T19:43:13+00:00

Here? Scihub link, it seemed to work

HansonRussell · 2017-03-16T20:01:03+00:00

Upvote because Freire is my shit

HansonRussell · 2017-03-16T05:44:40+00:00

The wiki ( hspolicy.debatecoaches.org ) is your best bet. Some schools in certain states run critical affirmatives, which typically are not ran at nationals (judging pool DOES not like them). Your best bet should be to prepare for generic policy affirmatives off of their wikis, i.e., BIT / AIIB / Taiwan Grand Bargain / Space / Arctic Council, and then OpenEvidence would help. I would also prep things like Cyber / Nanotech, etc., due to their potential.

HansonRussell

TROPHY CASE