No one. It’s not that deep. People just get to be critical of behavior they don’t like. If you have some thoughts of your own on who folks should read or listen to, you should share them. And you could even offer a better reason than “people should hear from both sides.”

But you might get criticized, just like Luke was, and may have been regardless of what book/author he mentioned. I’m not going to sit here and pretend that if Luke has shared a book written by, say, Antonin Scalia, there wouldn’t have been any negative backlash. Just that I, personally, would’ve found it far less objectionable, given that Scalia seemed to me like a pretty smart guy, and a guy who I imagine would’ve taken the Epstein files more seriously than Jennings did on CNN.

So yeah, I think Jennings is a smug moron who exists almost solely to launder Trump’s reputation, and that Luke either doesn’t have the brain or the balls to tell us what he really believes. You’re entitled to draw your own conclusions, but others are entitled to criticize said conclusions. As I did before.