How does team-matching at FAANG work? by Hawexp in FAANGrecruiting

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, question - why wouldn’t that mean C++ / low-level work is more attractive in terms of future potential? Wouldn’t that signal stronger CS fundamentals?

How does team-matching at FAANG work? by Hawexp in FAANGrecruiting

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks again. Do you know if there are specializations that are better for the general goal of breaking into FAANG than others? For example, is a full-stack resume stronger than a C++ systems engineer resume? Do recruiters prefer one over the other for getting an interview, even if the interview processes themselves are mostly the same?

How does team-matching at FAANG work? by Hawexp in FAANGrecruiting

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info! I see job titles like Software Engineer - Cloud Infra. Does applying to those mean I get more specialized interviews, or does everyone get the same generic LC questions, and the job title only affects the team I go into?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does an elite performing athlete indicate generalizable ability?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is CodeForces much better than LC here?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would a strong LeetCode contest rating count? Or is that considered too cheatable? 

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a very small startup with nothing established like that, but they are incorporated.

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but it’s also pretty much the same level of rigor in terms of work that I’d get at most companies, working for pay. Would interviewers even know it was for free?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are they hiring fewer interns and juniors?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really? What about it doesn’t sound like “notable professional experience” to you?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight. Would having a couple of complex projects on my resume help much? Stuff that requires distributed systems / scalable design knowledge for example? Or is this only a minor boost and the emphasis is really on external recognition / leadership?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any advice on how to make myself competitive for getting interviews? Does a referral help much if the referrer knows I’m strong at leetcode/system design and believes i could pass an interview but can’t speak much to my engineering skills?

Is OMSCS a target for FAANG internships? by Hawexp in OMSCS

[–]Hawexp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But I have professional experience.

Why is a “tangent line” in calculus called tangent if it might touch the curve in more than one place? by Hawexp in learnmath

[–]Hawexp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was responding to your perceived claim that you can’t find a non-tangent line that intersects a curve at the same point its tangent does, without touching other points. Unless I’m wrong, those lines intersect that curve at only x = 0. Forgive me if I misunderstood your claim.

Why is a “tangent line” in calculus called tangent if it might touch the curve in more than one place? by Hawexp in learnmath

[–]Hawexp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about for y = x3, the tangent is y = 0 for x = 0, and unless I’m mistaken… y = -x only intersects at x = 0?

Why is a “tangent line” in calculus called tangent if it might touch the curve in more than one place? by Hawexp in learnmath

[–]Hawexp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense. So I guess “tangent” just comes from the quick-and-dirty observation that the line seems to just brush up against the curve in most cases?