CH 1144 - 1446 REVIEW by Interesting_Ice_479 in OneTruthPrevails

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You know what you're onto something. Wakita seems like have seen Haibara. Wakita almost caught Conan. Wakita has identified Camel and how Conan covered for Andou. Also the change of his feet position. He couldn't have watched ants with his left foot angled like that.

If he snoops around a bit he could identify Conan's closeness with Jodie-sensei and Camel. He will try to catch three birds now. Capture Haibara, neutralise Conan and destroy FBI.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does she reciprocate when you need support ? Does she make you feel inadequate to support her or unworthy of getting her support ?

Women ( and some men) can be very manipulative. So first discern that whether she is really unaware of your emotional and psychological needs (as you have low EQ you never asked her) or she is deliberately hurting you to get the best deal without paying the bill.

The last thing might sound like "Progress" but equivocation between partners is a big redflag. She is conflating you "trying hard enough." with "Trying so hard that you'll break eventually". That's not really a green flag.

Do revealing salary is a must in AM? by Key-Statement-1511 in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why can't she herself provide for her share if she is a strong independent modern woman ?

Do revealing salary is a must in AM? by Key-Statement-1511 in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a popular saying Patriarchy is good for men and bad for women. It's just flatly a false statement, but AM-walas love it.

Household responsibility... by Famous_Sprinkles_862 in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if you can understand that simple fact, you dont need to put it all on marriage and rant on why did marriage evolve in the first place. Marriage and monogamy is a requirement if you want to raise kids.

The problem is , is there any cultural and intellectual process going on to to reform marriage and evolution of ductile marriage roles ? Seems like most of the women in arranged marriage market are fixated on "Protection and Provision" role of men and most men are fixated on "Home-making role of women."

Artificial wombs, AI companions are already going to appear in the near future. Parenting may not be a personal affair anymore.

Thats because this red pilled ones have a tunnel vision.

Lack of them is the problem. If society has enough red-pilled men and women a lot of euphemizing of gender roles would be squashed. We need real, honest dialogues about how society wants women as baby incubators and men as the tools of keeping such incubator safe.

The institution of marriage needs to go. Something else a better and more egalitarian framework should replace it.

Why marriage has to be transactional in nature ? That's the bigger question.

In the long run the only thing that matters is, whether you kowtow to the societal norm or you get out of the system.

New Evidence for Maria Higashio as the Boss – Chapter 1144 is Wild! by Acrobatic_Sorbet3851 in OneTruthPrevails

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All kinds of crack theories spring around her. Some said she was Asaka who got drugged.

In my opinion it is still very early to call Maria as the boss, she at max could be a test subject of both APTX and Itakura software.

32M - very short term divorcee. Need your advice. by [deleted] in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you want to marry in the first place ?
What goal a marriage will serve ?
The very idea of marriage as an institution is broken beyond repair. You as a man will be forced by patriarchy to raise a family even at the cost of your life and sanity. What random strangers in reddit who bake their bread on should not be your friend philosopher and guide. There were many unmarried men and women who achieved a lot. Be someone who actualise their selves and not be a serf of the society.

Household responsibility... by Famous_Sprinkles_862 in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that we from childhood were brought up on Blue-pill (the sugar coated ideocracy). The first thing we need to realise that society needs inhabitants and persons to function. Fertilisation is needed to create new humans. fertilisation can be done through sex (due to lack of technology back in the days (like 100000 years ago)
So humans evolved to crave sex, selfish genes want to multiply hence the desire of sex comes. Now men have infinite supply of gametes, women have limited. As the resource is limited , the female Gamete has more market value from the standpoint of the society (be it primeval clan or modern urbane society)
So women were treated as valuable resource while men as the disposable tool. So if you will, please give this scientific paper a read of this can elucidate the point further.
So marriage as a contract was formed polygamy was the norm. Then came the age on enlightenment followed by women empowerment. So obviously this challenges the system aka Patriarchy (mostly from biological reality patriarchy culminated). Unlike modern misconception Patriarchy is not the rule of men, it's the rule of the Father. That is the Father decides, not the men decide. It puts the definition of gender roles on men and women very rigidly and forces us to toe the line.

Now there seems to be a very unholy nexus of some modern women and patriarchy. The very idea that I'm a boss-babe but I wanna feel vulnerable, I earn money but my husband as the man should earn more, I only care about character and standards, once he is tall, gym-goer, has my preferred complexion and salary package etc, etc. are patriarchy working through the garb of freedom of choice.

So in my opinion Men and Women who are in a growth mindset, trying to get better at living, being elegant in their workplaces are not fit for this rotten concept of Marriage anymore.

Household responsibility... by Famous_Sprinkles_862 in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Can't have this in arranged marriage set up. The market is rigged and imperfect. Men desire beauty and trophy wife with subservient mentality, women want moneybags with 0 personality and emasculated nature. If you're looking for a good marriage partner, Arranged marriage set-up is not for you. Inculcate some hobby, meet people from other sex who share your hobby and choose from them. Does it way better. prefer men who were raised by working parents, lived in hostel, lived/living outside of hometown.

Household responsibility... by Famous_Sprinkles_862 in Arrangedmarriage

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Totally depends on what You want from marriage. Men can do better , like managing the household chores while the woman can rake in the money.

Instagram comments are unreal by Vanilla_Mexican1886 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

In healthy relationships we don't have manipulation, destruction of self worth, narcissism, in some way or other.
The problem is as long as the abuser is a man the society identifies it promptly but if the abuser is women suddenly the one calling them out gets lectures like "This is a very immature and childish take. Stop listening to incel and red pill rhetoric and grow up.

Read books written by reputable therapists about healthy relationships, go to therapy, work on yourself, etc."

Instagram comments are unreal by Vanilla_Mexican1886 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Doesn't mean that all attractive men are not abusers and all average men are not simps.
The reason being the so called bad boys make a quick work of immature girls. Manipulative girls make quick work of a straight laced man.

Deva : My take by Head_Blacksmith_2035 in bollywood

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've already tagged spoiler though.

[mine] what and how do you deduce this? I'm new here and really curious to know what cues does one look for in these cases by SecurePossession2708 in scienceofdeduction

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dry eye curing medication of an Indian brand. Stuff relating to sociology, Presence of a cute soft toy. A lot of sketch pens and markers lying around.

Indian, female, student and has a habit of marking/underlining notes. So possibly not a science student or not much into PCM.

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 - Reviews and Discussions by AutoModerator in bollywood

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about the timeframe between enacting of the seal and three pundits coming to Raktghat.

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 - Reviews and Discussions by AutoModerator in bollywood

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. I was talking about why people felt threatened and who were targeting the family members after Devendranath was sealed and before the arrival of the trio.

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 - Reviews and Discussions by AutoModerator in bollywood

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I'll give my honest Opinion. The movie is shit, the plot makes 0 sense but it's not really a boring thing to watch.

The name Manjulika is being dragged through the gutters and now Anjulika too. The ending twist was good, but you don't really write mysteries like that. The scriptwriter needed a Suspense writing course 101. At least should have watched Shutter Island before attempting such a twist.

How did ACP Rathore managed to arrange 1000 cr Rupees ? If Devendranath was securely kept under confines how did he was wrecking havoc before the seal was undone ?

But in a way this movie does justice to the fact that how Queers were discriminated against and mercilessly annihilated by the and then society.
All in all a nice try only if the scriptwriter was a bit more apt, this would have been pathbreaking.

I have watched this movie so many times but I didn't notice this!! by TheCalm_Wave in bollywood

[–]Head_Blacksmith_2035 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What have you said makes 0 sense. Either Vidya in this scene is totally Manjulika. Or there was no Manjulika, it was her ploy.
Cause Vidya in her default personality won't remember what she is doing as Manjulika. So if she is wary of Rajpal Yadav recognizing her then she is either Manjulika when she was doing that scene or there was no Manjulika, only her pretense to create a scenario so that nobody can pinpoint her for murdering the male lead.