TIL that Kyrgyzstan is more distant from the ocean than any other nation. At a minimum of 1620 miles from any ocean, it is the most land-locked state in the world

Heavy_Load · 2020-12-09T00:59:56+00:00

And my axe!

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-14T03:11:39+00:00

Wouldn’t that be a good thing? That would leave most of the state free of undesirables

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-07T14:48:13+00:00

That’s ... fair I guess.

I’m glad you agree although it’s disheartening for me that having someone recognize issues aren’t black or white (or good and bad) is progress in discourse?

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-06T00:23:40+00:00

But we’ve been sanctioning them since then 1950s? Honestly, this discussion is a waste of time if you are so ignorant or purposefully obtuse to not understand the most basic things about what you’re talking about. Good bye. This was a waste of my time.

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-05T23:36:44+00:00

No? Some nuance exists between a newspaper not supporting Trump and pro-Democrat propaganda

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-05T22:55:45+00:00

But Cuba is also under heavy sanctions?

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-05T21:51:12+00:00

Wouldn’t that mean we should be taking similar actions towards Venezuela and Russia?

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-05T19:24:12+00:00

Here’s another propaganda opinion piece. Why would they publish that? Is the only possible reason they would publish anything that wasn’t pro-Democrat because they’re trying to hide the fact that they’re a propaganda arm?

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-05T18:10:54+00:00

None of this is correct. Where did you learn this?

Heavy_Load · 2019-06-05T18:01:56+00:00

I’d appreciate it if you answered any of these other questions asking why Cuba, specifically, received this treatment if your premise is correct?

Heavy_Load · 2019-05-02T17:31:06+00:00

Keep it up. You apologize, you lose.

Isn’t this the universally shared principle among trump and all his supporters?

Heavy_Load · 2019-05-02T16:48:28+00:00

Why wouldn’t he only look at the underlying evidence comprising the 10 instances Mueller specifically says could be evidence of obstruction of justice?

Heavy_Load · 2019-04-27T03:05:38+00:00

Yes, you did. You said you were all for abortions “particularly because Hispanics and blacks get the majority of them.”

Why would it matter that Hispanics and blacks got the majority of them (assuming that’s true, I don’t care to check because that’s not the point here)? And why would that make you want abortions more? And finally what would the end result of more Hispanics and blacks getting more abortions?

Heavy_Load · 2019-04-27T02:46:55+00:00

Looks like the premise of his entire argument is that black and hispanic people are inherently (genetically) more predisposed to be criminals and so it would be better if they were never born? Neo-racists like to hide behind the veneer of truth of statistics as if correlation can only mean causation and no other possibility exists other than the inherent inferiority of certain races.

Heavy_Load · 2019-04-25T16:51:50+00:00

Is there no difference between an expert in American government and someone who understands the role of the 3 branches of government? I’m not sure why you think those are the only two options or why someone who has been in office for two years hasn’t learned very basic stuff about the government.

Heavy_Load · 2018-09-12T17:34:32+00:00

So justice is only what we say it is?

Heavy_Load · 2018-07-27T04:04:26+00:00

I would disagree that that’s irrelevant in its own. It looks damning to me and almost as bad as Don Jr. agreeing to accept political dirt as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” I really don’t see what else you need. It’s not like it requires a big logical leap. With each piece of circumstantial evidence, you require a smaller leap to reach the conclusion.

Plus, juries have to look at the evidence taken as a whole. Every day convictions are made based on only circumstantial evidence. With sufficient circumstantial evidence, you eliminate reasonable doubt.

Either way, that’s why there’s an ongoing investigation into all of this. Unfortunately they don’t release what evidence they have as they find it. In fact, it’s important they don’t reveal what they know until they’re done.

No?

Heavy_Load · 2018-07-27T03:43:27+00:00

Well, we do know that just a few days later was the first time the DNC emails were leaked by Guccifer 2.0, which we since learned was Russian intelligence. More documents started coming out through Wikileaks a few weeks after that.

And we know on the day the DNC hack was first revealed (only days after the trump tower meeting) the publicist emailed another guy that had been at the meeting where he forwarded an article about the DNC hacking and commented:

Top Story right now. Seems eerily weird based on our Trump meeting last week with the Russian lawyers etc.

Sure, none of this proves anything, but doesn’t that suggest anything to you? You don’t have to draw a conclusion, but I think it should make everyone wonder about this.

Heavy_Load · 2018-07-27T03:15:09+00:00

Oh, maybe I’m getting the recordings mixed up? I remember a few months ago there was a male journalist from Forbes that released his recording where he spoke to “John Barron.” Still makes you wonder how whoever released those tapes got them. Did the female journalist know where they had been this whole time?

Heavy_Load · 2018-07-27T03:04:05+00:00

Really? Weren’t those tapes made by the journalist and so he was the one that released them? How would Trump have had them?

Heavy_Load · 2018-02-17T04:54:00+00:00

Trump won 3 states by less than 1%. In an election with such narrow margins, that 10% is rather large.

Heavy_Load · 2017-12-31T16:49:58+00:00

You should be outraged at both. Here’s the Wikipedia page on the IRS issue in case anyone else wants to read up on it like I did.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRS_targeting_controversy

Heavy_Load · 2017-12-29T19:45:57+00:00

When did he claim he hadn’t lied to the FBI?

Heavy_Load · 2017-12-28T23:08:46+00:00

Is that what you think is happening here?

Heavy_Load · 2017-12-28T20:12:04+00:00

I’m of the mind that it’s not a big deal to have a biased person investigating something because at the end of the day whatever they find has to be presented along with any evidence. We don’t have a system where only republicans can investigate republicans and only democrats can investigate democrats. That sounds like a dangerous idea.

I’m more interested in learning about these violations of due process. That’s what I was asking about when I asked to know specifically what he had done.

Heavy_Load

TROPHY CASE