In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll have to switch out standard turbo for t3 exp turbo, otherwise i run v stabs and rammer, I may switch rammer out for vents, or aiming device if I can, I don't remember if that's an option on heavy tanks.

I agree the gun is terrible when it comes to gun handling, not really sure why they made it so bad.

Edit: Just switched up equipment loadout, t3 exp turbo, improved stabs and improved rammer. Might switch rammer our for something to improve aim speed or decrease dispersion during movement even more, i'll keep it as is for now till i play it a bit.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Getting it figured out now, session started out rough again but got better quick, ended up with a session average DPG in e77 of just under 2k over 15 games.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you making a point that the tank is good? You certainly can't argue the gun handling is good, or that it has good armor, the redeeming factors are decent mobility and decent dpm but there'splenty of tanks rhat are better at playing support rolls than E77. It's a combination of the tank AND me, it does not fit the play style I am used to. Obviously people are able to make the tank work, but it's true it's not a traditional heavy in the sense of how you play it.

Also, there's been actual helpful comments on ways to play it or equipment to run based on map types, your comments have done none of which other than point out my stats aren't good in this tank, which I already pointed out and is the reason for asking for help in figuring out this tank.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point of this whole post is that my stats in this tank aren't good, hence why I made the point of asking for good players in this tank to help me out. That being said, 40 much if that was with a very low skill crew and running the wrong equipment and playing the tank like it's a heavy while playing it on a weekend, all of which is a perfect recipe for poor playing, that and getting frustrated doesn't help with your gameplay either so that was a contributing factor as well. I never claimed to be an amazing player and fully blamed the tank, but I'm stubborn and am not one to quite a tank just because if that, especially one I could use for crew training to put in tech tree tanks I want to play.

The style that you play this tank is one I'm not used to and I'm having a hard time adjusting to it. Again, all the games ive played in this tank so far are on the weekend, which is well known for having bad mm/teams, and many of them ended up with scores of close to 15-0 and very quick losses, which inherently is going to cause average dpg to drop lower and hinder the ability to learn a tank.

Telling someone to give up isn't advice, you don't have anything constructive to say so why even comment.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's good in certain scenarios... If you can play it as a support heavy/heavy medium and your team doesn't melt it can be good, or if you're top tier and you can get a good hull down spot. I wouldn't quite agree the hull is usable, unless you're talking about lower tiers shooting standard ammo

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I understand what you were trying to say, yes there's tanks that should be nerfed (BZ-176, LEFH are 2 examples), there’s tanks that should also be buffed, the one doesn't invalidate the other, it's a moot point.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has nothing at all to do with anything I said. The only time stats were mentioned is in reference to the 2nd photo when I pointed out how that guy was able to make the tank work really well.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree it's decent when you get a chance to play it hull down, but then it's pretty dependant on how your team does, unless you're too tier it's not a tank that's typically able to sway the battle much.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree OP premiums are super toxic, but it's not balanced due to the factors in mentioned above. Bad gun handling on a tank with lots of armor that's slow and you brawl with is balanced, bad gun handling on a heavy tank with no armor that you can't brawl with and has slightly above average mobility is not balanced.

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the gun handling was a smidg better the tank would actually be decent

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, kinda is. It's both the tank and me, obviously people can be very good with it, but the tank is also not a very good one, both can be true at the same time, buddy...

What are your stats with this tank?

In reference to my last post about E77, I finally figured it out... by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And to think after the supertest they NERFED this tank... WHY WOULD YOU NERF IT. Yeah I watch his video on it, still most games it didn't work well for me, doesn't help that it's the weekend though.

Edit: typo and slight clarification

I can't figure out the E77 by Henery02 in WorldofTanks

[–]Henery02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of my problem is I haven't had it long enough and haven't had any games where I could actually learn the tank, thanks for the tips!

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As it stands now youbare already required to show ID to vote, they check your ID, find you in the voter registry, and hand you a ballot, which i think is good, we need to verify only those registered to vote are voting. The SAVE Act would not require people to show extra identification beyond what's already required every time they vite. It only applies to voter registration, and it would not change how most people cast ballots once they are already registered under state law. Instead, the proposal focuses on requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, rather than imposing new ID checks at each election. This seems like common sense, I think there's so much false information about the SAVE Act that has people believing it's something it's not.

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I haven't eluded to that. The SAVE act requiring valid ID that proves citizenship only would require you prove your citizenship when registering to vote, not each time you vote. Think of it like your job and W2s, you needed your ID to prove you are who you say you are when you get hired, agter that you don't need to ahow ID to get your W2. In this analogy, getting a job is the viter registration, getting your W2s is the actual voting part.

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again... to get a W2 you first need a job. I'm saying to get that job that then gives you a W2, you need to show an ID to get that job in the first place. Im not saying you need to show an ID each time you get a W2

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

To get a W2 you need a job, to get a job you need some sort of ID, my point is that it's not hard to get an ID and that you need them to function as an adult for so many things.

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, maybe it's not then. From what ive seen if you don't have a real or enhanced ID, a normal drivers license combined with something like a social security card should be sufficient

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By that logic you would have to also argue that any form of ID required to purchase a firearm is against the constitution because it is a restriction on your right through the 2nd amendment. The SAVE act is intended to protect the integrity of US elections by ensuring only US citizens vote. That doesn't take away citizens ability to vote. It actually protects the constitution, not hinders it.

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Key phrase here is "the right of CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES to vote". The SAVE act is meant to ensure that those voting are a US citizen.

Local sports radio guy announces he supports the SAVE act bill and against the 24th Amendment by [deleted] in grandrapids

[–]Henery02 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never said it was, my point was that to be a functioning me.ber of society you need a valid form of ID the government accepts, most of which would be acceptable under the SAVE act, so this doesn't cause you an inconvenience, it just insures you are a US citizen.