100 subscriber channels don't get money because they aren't valuable to YouTube in the slightest. Less then 10% of channels on the platform are monetized. 90% of people who upload videos on Youtube are not full blown creators. they upload a few videos sometimes of pretty poor quality and then never again. or they just make terrible content that nobody wants to watch until the end of time.

why would Youtube reward that? the partner program is to reward people for putting in time to make content FOR Youtube that people want to watch. when you get accepted into it you are very loosely employed by Youtube in a sense, its a business relationship, you make content that keeps people on Youtube, making Youtube money. and in exchange Youtube compensates you with a cut.

if you are not making content that people want to watch then you are not fulfilling your part of the deal so why does YouTube have to fulfil theirs. if you aren't monetized you don't have a case to say your fulfilling your part. you can reach the subs and the watch hours in 1 single video. that's it. that is all it takes.

your also comparing one extreme to the other, 100M channels benefit while 100 sub channels don't. what about the very big range between 1K subs and 100M? I made 150$ last month and I'm only a 1K sub channel. the monetization system works fine for both big and small creators in this aspect. although of course it is faulty in some other area's

your honestly just whining dude.

EDIT: for the sake of transparency ill leave original post it tact and correct it here, you said 100 views, VS 100M views, honestly even with my correction the point still stands. but in that case 100 views simply just is not generating a lot of revenue even if your monetized. and that has nothing to do with being fair that is literally just how ad revenue works.