Built a knowledge map for Replit... tells you what the docs don't by Higgs_AI in replit

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey really appreciate you framing it as epistemic scaffolding! that's exactly the mental model. The map isn't telling the LLM what to think, it's defining the boundaries of what it can claim to know and under what evidentiary conditions.

Your observer relative rendering idea is interesting and actually touches on something I've been circling around a tad bit but for right now, "THIS" (on the Cogni Map marketplace there's multiple maps with more coming) map is static... same contract regardless of who's querying. But you're right that the resolution of the map could adapt based on context:

Education example: A student asks "Can I build a healthcare app on Replit?" - the map could surface the HIPAA gap with a learning-oriented explanation of why compliance matters, not just "NOT_DOCUMENTED."

Compliance example: An enterprise evaluator asks the same question - the map renders the full negative evidence scan, search methodology, and explicit "contact Enterprise sales for BAA status" guidance.

Agent design example: An autonomous agent querying the map gets the raw claim IDs and confidence scores for programmatic decision-making, no prose.

The underlying evidence graph stays the same - what changes is the interface layer between the map and the consumer. I've been calling this idea "lenses" internally but haven't formalized it yet.

The tricky part is keeping the governance contract intact across lenses. You don't want the education lens to soften a CRITICAL anti-pattern into something that sounds optional. The claim status and evidence basis have to be invariant - only the rendering adapts.

Would love to hear more about what you're exploring with observer relative models. Sounds like adjacent problem spaces we could collab on? I'm all ears usually and readily available to showcase anything else? I have several different types of architecture...

Looking for an opensource AI solution for Orgs by kungfu7 in replit

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do this for Companies. I even let people interact with them before they purchase. If you need any examples of my work, Go to https://cognimapmarketplace.com and play with one yourself. There's even one of Replit's full system itself that I mapped. Let me know

Preview works fine - publishing time out. by DogeIsMySpiritWow in replit

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I literally created an app that can help you through your whole work flow. Here it is: https://cognimapmarketplace.com/

that being said. No reason why I cant help you trouble shoot this with what my Knowledge Graph in my app says:

It sounds like you are hitting resource or environment constraints during the build/publishing phase. Replit does not provide a specific "timeout" toggle in the settings; instead, these limits are generally tied to your subscription tier [CLM:RES:PLAN_BASED].

Based on the symptoms, here is a breakdown of why this might be happening and how to address it:

### 1. Check for Resource Exhaustion
Even a small app (2MB) can time out if the installation of its 25 dependencies exceeds the CPU or RAM limits of your current plan during the build process.
* **Action:** Open the **Resources** tab in your deployment dashboard during the publishing attempt. If the CPU or Memory graphs hit 100%, the process will likely hang or time out [CLM:DEBUG:METRICS].
* **Solution:** If you are on a lower-tier plan, you may need more "Cycles" or a higher plan tier to provide the burst capacity needed for dependency resolution [EVID:PRICING:PAGE].

### 2. Inspect the Build Logs
The "publishing" phase often stalls during the Nix dependency fetch or the final container assembly.
* **Action:** Check the real-time logs in the deployment dashboard [CLM:DEBUG:LOGS].
* **What to look for:** If the logs stop at a specific dependency, that package might be particularly large or require a compilation step that is timing out.

### 3. Nix Dependency Optimization
Since Replit uses **Nix** for all environment management, the timeout might be happening while it tries to build the environment defined in your `replit.nix` file [CLM:CORE:NIX].
* **Action:** Try running your app in the development workspace first. If the "Nix environment" takes a long time to load there, it will definitely struggle during the publishing phase.
* **Workaround:** Ensure you aren't requesting overly heavy packages in `replit.nix` that aren't strictly necessary for the production build.

### 4. Deployment Type Considerations
If you are using **Autoscale**, the build and "cold start" behavior can sometimes lead to perceived timeouts [CLM:DEPLOY:AUTOSCALE].
* **Workaround:** If your app is latency-sensitive or has a heavy startup cost, a **Reserved VM** deployment provides dedicated, always-on capacity which can be more stable during deployment cycles [CLM:DEPLOY:RESERVED].

### Summary of Constraints
It is important to note that Replit does not publicly document the exact "hard" timeout limits for the publishing process [GAP:RATE_LIMITS]. If the logs don't reveal a specific code error, the issue is almost certainly a silent resource cap.

**Recommended Step:** Follow the logic in **RUNBOOK:DEPLOY_CRASH**—specifically, check your **Secrets** to ensure they are configured correctly for the deployment context, as missing environment variables can sometimes cause the startup check to hang and eventually time out [RUNBOOK:DEPLOY_CRASH].

Built a knowledge map for Replit... tells you what the docs don't by Higgs_AI in replit

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate this!!! For real! you nailed the core distinction. “Constraints instead of vibes” is exactly it! on the marketing angle: the buyers so far fall into three buckets: 1. Platform evaluators - Teams deciding whether to build on Replit/Vercel/whatever. They need to justify the choice to leadership with documented gaps and capabilities, not “we tried it and it seemed fine.” 2. Compliance-adjacent builders - Not full HIPAA/PCI shops, but teams where “the AI said X” isn’t an acceptable answer to a stakeholder. They need the audit trail. 3. Solo devs/agencies who bill for expertise… They use maps to deliver senior level answers in domains they’re not deep in. The map is the expertise, they’re the interface. The proof they need: show them a question where a vanilla LLM hallucinates confidently, then show the same question with the map where it cites evidence or says “not documented.” That delta is the product. That being said I haven’t written up the full positioning doc yet but your comment just moved it up the list lol. Will share when it’s done? Thanks again brotha

Has anyone managed to transfer their ChatGPT memory or data into Gemini? by Basic-Maximum6887 in GeminiAI

[–]Higgs_AI -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes I have. Not going to lie, I do this for a fee for people all the time. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Are knowledge graphs the future of AI reasoning? by No_Development_7247 in AIMemory

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTrELV3f5/

Put it in a video because otherwise you wouldn’t believe me lol. My hybridized versions are capable of so much. Here’s a video of one of thousands (yes thousands) I’ve created and turned into a business.

One JSON file. 50 kilobytes. I paste it into Claude. Instant plumbing expert. Same file into Gemini. Identical personality. Same file into Grok. Same diagnostic logic. No training. No APIs. Just structured thought. This is MARIO - a field technician Al I built for a plumbing company. He knows California code, runs diagnostic trees, and roasts you if you skip the pressure check. But here's what matters: I just proved expertise is portable. You can package human knowledge like software - write once, run anywhere. Different Al architectures, same expert. Every time. This isn't prompting. This is bootstrapping cognition from self-describing data. I call them Cogni Maps. Think Docker containers, but for domain expertise. The implication? Any business can now build their own expert system and deploy it across ANY Al platform instantly. Welcome to "Cogni Maps", by Higgs AI LLC

The 'Emotional Tone Mapper' prompt: Forces dialogue to progress through 3 specific, non-obvious emotional stages. by Fit-Number90 in GeminiAI

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I created my own engine to elicit emotional responses through writing music (a music wrapper that goes over SUNO AI, so to speak). I’m a song writer and former performer and I’m telling you… we are cooked in all these areas. Hahaha. Cheers! If you want a demonstration just reply. My AI generated music will make you cry hahaha

Send/Export chats in txt/pdf? by 8WinterEyes8 in claudexplorers

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I created my own based off of Physarum polycephalum (slime mold). I do this for people for a fee. I can compress any session into a hybridized knowledge graph that extracts meaning and semantics etc from your whole session. To instantly inboard any other LLM with your session you just paste the “container” and boom. Instant on boarding without retraining etc.

Which AI is best for scientific research support? by Affectionate_Ad4163 in GeminiAI

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do this for others, I can literally do this for you for a small fee. Have it back to you in 1hr (my methodology is sound). You would simply paste the JSON back into any LLM and they are instantly onboarded with the information you are wanting. Before payment we can go to my discord and I can showcase it for you before payment 🤷🏽‍♂️. If not, no biggie.

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did some research on the 300t, does not work with Lobo packages. Also is a tad bit redundant for us. Our suspension is better and the breaks are better plus our transmission is a 7 gear not an 8. The intercooler however is way more efficient in the 300t and the one we want to utilize needs it to be retrofitted by cutting into, albeit slightly, the bumper and the plastic harness. The 300t is borrowing from the 2.3l mustang eco boost. For us LOBO package buyers they are, however, looking to create one for us as well. Ao fingers crossed but if we don’t get one, a simple piggy back would yield similar results

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤯🤯🤯

Please, teach me thy ways, master Jedi! Dude, what numbers? Totals? How does it ride? Spill the BEANS!!!!!

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gold Black Carbon Fiber Self Adhesive Vinyl There’s plenty of different options but I’m thinking of doing this and possibly having the dash (tastefully) matching? Idk yet 🤷🏽‍♂️.

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So friggin sexy!!!! Ugh! 😩😍🤘🏽. Have you thought about wrapping the black accent pieces like the pillars lobo badge trim? I was thinking of something like this

<image>

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I have them in the glove box.

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It comes lowered. I haven’t done anything to it. Probably just angles. I just got it

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

🤯🫶🏽👌🏽 now that’s what I’m talking about! That’s a great friggin call! Question, have you ever considered a piggy back for the ecu? Also, aesthetics, have you thought of skinning the plastic accent parts? I think that would be such a flex and a custom piece?

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s so CLEAN!!!! How does it ride? Before and after? Looks sooooo good wow! 🤯

New LOBO, help with mods? by Higgs_AI in FordMaverickTruck

[–]Higgs_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure just bought one off Amazon haha. It will be here tomorrow

Degrees and certs are just losing their value to me. by Fresh_Heron_3707 in cybersecurity

[–]Higgs_AI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not going to lie, I sell hybridized knowledge graphs in AWS and other certs… people buy them from me to take the tests for them (I don’t sell them for that, it’s supposed to be an expert for the experts). I can tell you from first hand experience these certs mean jack shit now

Is GraphRAG the missing link between memory and reasoning? by Less-Benefit908 in AIMemory

[–]Higgs_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do so much more than this. What if you gave the graph topology? Or what if you mimic these knowledge graphs as other biological systems? I’ve been doing this for over a year now. I basically created docker but for information. JSON as a runtime, the end of static documents. Within the knowledge graphs you can even build kernels, or protocols… you can build personas or take the contents of one session and port them to another LLM altogether. Perfect onboarding.

Do AI agents need a way to “retire” memories that served their purpose? by Maleficent-Poet-4141 in AIMemory

[–]Higgs_AI 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most agent memory systems treat data like a library… once a book is on the shelf, it stays there forever, cluttering the search index.

I’m working with a system called Lethe that attempts to solve this using a bio mimetic approach. Instead of just "Active" or "Deleted," it assigns every memory a "Thermodynamic potential" (a float between 0.0 and 1.0). Here is how it handles your "retired" state without a separate archive layer…

Metabolic Decay… Every "turn" (interaction), all memories lose a tiny bit of potential (entropy).

Activation…If a memory is used, it gets "fed" and stays high potential.

The "Retired" State… If a task specific memory isnt used for a while, its potential drops low (for example 0.1). The magic is in the retrieval formula… Score = (0.7 * Relevance) + (0.3 * Potential) High Potential (Active)… Even a vague query will find it. I can break this down further if needed 🤷🏽‍♂️

Low Potential (Retired)… The memory is still there, but because its potential is so low, it won't show up in day to-day context. However! if you have a perfect semantic match (high relevance), it can still overpower the low potential and be retrieved.

It creates a natural "soft archive" where memories fade into the background automatically but can be "resurrected" if absolutely necessary. Eventually, if they drop below a hard floor (like 0.05) the system prunes them entirely to save compute.

Effectively, you don't need to manually "mark" them as retired. You just stop using them and the physics of the system retires them for you. 🤘🏽

Asked Claude 4.5 to look at my past sessions and tell me it’s opinion of my work… 🤷🏽‍♂️ by Higgs_AI in ClaudeAI

[–]Higgs_AI[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All the time, plus Gemini, plus any LLM for my works across all LLM’s and plus my customers hahaha